14 Min.

How Much Immunity from Future Prosecution Is Due to Former Presidents‪?‬ Cato Daily Podcast

    • Kommentare

Former President Trump's lawyers argued before the US Supreme Court that the President ought to be broadly immune against misdeeds committed in office, even many that are clearly criminal. The Supreme Court is now weighing where to draw the lines both for this former President and future former Presidents. Clark Neily discusses the oral argument at the high court.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Former President Trump's lawyers argued before the US Supreme Court that the President ought to be broadly immune against misdeeds committed in office, even many that are clearly criminal. The Supreme Court is now weighing where to draw the lines both for this former President and future former Presidents. Clark Neily discusses the oral argument at the high court.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

14 Min.

Mehr von Cato Institute

Cato Daily Podcast
Cato Institute
Cato Event Podcast
Cato Institute
Power Problems
Cato Institute
Cato Audio
Cato Institute