Kinsella On Liberty Stephan Kinsella

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 431.



My appearance on The Rational Egoist: Exploring Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics with Stephan Kinsella. (Spotify)



https://youtu.be/hgPJCebYj-I?si=hPN2vGmj_dbkdtk4



From his shownotes:

In a stimulating episode of The Rational Egoist, host Michael Liebowitz engages in a thought-provoking discussion and debate with Stephan Kinsella, a prominent libertarian writer and patent attorney, on Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics. Drawing on their deep knowledge of libertarian legal theory and philosophical principles, Michael and Stephan delve into the nuances of Hoppe's argument and its implications for understanding individual rights and property norms.



Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics serves as the focal point of this conversation, as Michael and Stephan critically examine its premises, logic, and implications. With rigorous analysis and intellectual rigor, they explore the foundational principles underlying argumentation ethics and assess its strengths and weaknesses as a framework for understanding natural rights and ethical norms.



Listeners will be treated to a dynamic exchange of ideas and perspectives, as Michael and Stephan engage in a spirited debate on key aspects of argumentation ethics, including its reliance on self-ownership, the universality of ethical principles, and its compatibility with other libertarian theories of property and justice. Through reasoned discourse and respectful disagreement, they offer listeners a comprehensive overview of the complexities involved in grappling with foundational questions of ethics and rights.



This episode is not just an intellectual exercise but also a testament to the vitality of philosophical inquiry and the importance of engaging in robust dialogue to deepen our understanding of fundamental concepts. Whether you're a seasoned libertarian thinker, a student of philosophy, or someone curious about the intersection of ethics and political theory, this episode offers a captivating exploration of Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics and its implications for our understanding of individual freedom and moral principles.



Tune in to The Rational Egoist for an enlightening conversation with Stephan Kinsella, as we delve into the intricacies of Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics and its relevance for contemporary debates on rights, justice, and human flourishing. Whether you find yourself nodding in agreement or raising questions of your own, this episode promises to ignite your curiosity and inspire deeper reflection on the principles that underpin a free and just society.

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 429.



A facebook friend from Brazil, Bruno Pires, corresponded with me about some various issues and we decided to discuss it for a podcast episode. We discuss a variety of issues.



See his promoted VPN sponsor Aria VPN.



https://youtu.be/a8YdkT2_Tec

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 428.



I was a guest on Episode 316 of The Bob Murphy Show, entitled “Stephan Kinsella on Rothbard’s Contributions to Legal Theory." Bob's shownotes: "Stephan joins Bob to discuss his new book, Legal Foundations of a Free Society. They cover Rothbard’s contributions to legal theory, as well as Bob and Stephan’s differing entry points into libertarianism."



https://youtu.be/iWx8DKMwk30?si=54KjWm_BndPX4a_e

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 427.







Yesterday (April 10, 2024) I participated in Strings Attached: Tracing the Global Systems that Bind, 62nd Annual International Affairs Symposium, Lewis & Clark College, Portland Oregon, Debate 5: Pirates and Patents. Debate Topic: Is international intellectual property regulation a necessary protection for innovators or a form of modern imperialism?



My opponent was Pieter Cleppe. My notes are appended below.



https://youtu.be/f_cpqc-oHd0



We got along well and had a nice dinner after the debate.



(Unofficial iphone Audio (mp3))











Strings Attached: Tracing the Global Systems that Bind.



62nd Annual International Affairs Symposium



Debate 5: Pirates and Patents.



Debate Topic: Is international intellectual property regulation a necessary protection for innovators or a form of modern imperialism?



Lewis & Clark College, Portland Oregon



April 10, 2024



Stephan Kinsella



 



Debate Topic: Is international intellectual property regulation a necessary protection for innovators or a form of modern imperialism?



“Patents, copyrights, trademarks, etc, are intangible legal protections that allow creators to monopolize the distribution of their ideas. The international system managing these rights is often praised for promoting and protecting innovation. However, it raises the costs of acquiring new technologies, life-saving medicines, and access to knowledge for developing states. How should international intellectual property standards balance these competing interests?”



 



Introduction



I am a practicing patent and intellectual property, or IP, attorney for 30 years and a libertarian for even longer than that.

At the dawn of my career, after many years of research and thought, I came to the conclusion that all forms of IP law are completely unjust.

This perspective will inform my remarks today.



 



Notice my opponent’s remarks were not systematic and did not carefully define the relevant terms.



In fact his arguments rested on two false assumptions: that patent and copyright increase innovation, and that IP law is therefore justified.







 



Imperialism and IP



What is imperialism? Imperialism: “a policy of extending a country’s power and influence through diplomacy or military force.”



“Imperialism is when a country extends its power into other territories for economic or political gain.”





Now, IP law is prevalent in the west: patent, copyright, trademark, and other forms.

There can be little doubt that the west, especially the United States, has used its influence and power to push or even coerce other countries to adopt US-style IP law, primarily patent and copyright



This is done sometimes by direct imposition or, more usually, by softer forms of coercion such as investment and free trade agreements or other international treaties

Direct imposition/coercion:



for example the US expanded Iraqi patent law by decree in 2004, by order of Paul Bremer, the “Administrator” of the “Coalition Provisional Authority”

German constitution, or “Basic Law,” 1949, under US domination: Article 96 authorizes the establishment by federal law of the Federal Patent Court

Example below: under pressures from the west, the Thai government specifically undertook not to implement Article 8 (on compulsory licensing) for HIV/AIDS treatment





Treaties: The Berne Convention already requires member states to have a minimum copyright term of life of the author plus 50 y...

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 426.



Matthew Sands of the Nations of Sanity project, which aims to promote the Non-Aggression Principle as a universal peace agreement, and I discussed various issues including: immigration and open borders, and so on.



(See previous episode with Matthew, KOL372 | Discussing Contract Theory, Restitution, Punishment, with Matthew Sands of Nations of Sanity and KOL362 | California Gold #6, with Matt Sands: Defining Libertarianism, Anarchism and Voluntaryism.)



https://youtu.be/zXKxc8QxqKo



Related links:



Switzerland, Immigration, Hoppe, Raico, Callahan

A Simple Libertarian Argument Against Unrestricted Immigration and Open Borders, LewRockwell.com, September 1, 2005

Van Dun on Freedom versus Property and Hostile Encirclement

Libertarian Answer Man: Homesteading Donuts, Hostile Encirclement, and Prostitution as Selling One’s Body

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 425.



From Adam Haman's show Haman Nature. Released Feb. 15, 2024.



From Adam's shownotes:



Adam gets all intellectual and stuff with Stephan Kinsella. Part two of this interview explains why the concept of "intellectual" property is illegitimate and impedes humanity's progress. [Previous episode: KOL423 | Haman Nature Ep. 1: Getting Argumentative.]



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vpTQHLw_kc



Update: See the response/commentary video:



https://youtu.be/k23t_8cUSmA?si=ImRcLsE7YB-dKWBj



00:00 – Intro



01:15 – Introducing two amazing books: Stephan's Against Intellectual Property and Against Intellectual Monopoly by Boldrin and Levine. Then Stephan touches on many aspects of the philosophical and consequential aspects of intellectual property laws. The dude goes all over the place! There's no stopping him! He knows so much!



26:38 -- Outro