A VC, a Headhunter, and a Trainer Walk into a Bar

A VC, a Headhunter, and a Trainer Walk into a Bar
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Investing
  • Updated weekly

VHTB is your guide to the talent, culture, and capital forces shaping the hard tech startup ecosystem. Each episode, hosts Justus Kilian of Space Capital, Seyka, and Brian Mejeur of AdAstra Talent Advisors, and Matt Gjertsen of BUILT bring stories and lessons from the front lines of building and backing some of the most innovative companies on the planet.

  1. 3 days ago

    Where will hard tech find the skilled manufacturing talent it needs?

    America wants to re-industrialize. But where are all the people needed to actually build everything going to come from? For decades, college and university were pushed as the first-class path while trade schools and skilled manufacturing careers weren't looked at in the same light. Now some of the people with the deepest machining and manufacturing expertise are getting closer to retirement, while demand for those skills is growing. The challenge isn't simply finding more people. It's figuring out how to transfer decades of knowledge, make manufacturing careers more accessible to a new generation, and use automation to increase what each skilled person can accomplish. In this episode, we talk about what the manufacturing talent shortage actually looks like, why mom-and-pop machine shops hold so much valuable knowledge, and how companies are approaching the problem through automation, acquisitions, apprenticeships, and bringing critical skills in-house. We also get into whether manufacturing expertise itself could become one of the most defensible advantages a hard tech company can build. Episode Highlight[00:00] Where will America's hard tech talent come from? [01:27] Why the manufacturing talent shortage is so difficult to solve [02:39] How college became the first-class path over skilled trades [03:19] Why highly skilled machinists are becoming harder to find [04:36] How much manufacturing knowledge has already disappeared? [05:36] The aging workforce problem inside legacy manufacturers [06:03] Can automation help close the manufacturing talent gap? [07:40] Are startups actually struggling to fill these roles yet? [10:20] Bringing mom-and-pop manufacturing into the modern era [11:13] How do we transfer expertise before skilled workers retire? [12:16] Why companies may need to build their own talent [13:45] Could manufacturing expertise become a competitive moat? [14:18] Why the manufacturing talent cliff may still be ahead Key TakeawaysThe manufacturing talent shortage isn't just about headcount. Some of the hardest skills to replace take years of hands-on experience to develop.For decades, college was pushed more heavily than trade schools, leaving many people unaware of highly skilled manufacturing career paths.As experienced machinists and other skilled workers retire, transferring what they know to the next generation becomes increasingly important.Automation doesn't necessarily eliminate the need for manufacturing workers. It can lower the barrier to entry and increase the productivity of the people already doing the work.Small mom-and-pop shops hold a significant amount of manufacturing expertise, creating opportunities to modernize, aggregate, and scale those capabilities.Companies can also build talent internally through apprenticeships and knowledge transfer, although getting experienced employees to make their expertise less dependent on themselves can be difficult.In hard tech, bringing difficult manufacturing capabilities in-house may be expensive, but that difficulty can also make them defensible. Where do you think the next generation of skilled manufacturing talent will come from, and what needs to change to make those careers more attractive? Subscribe to VHTB for more conversations about the talent, culture, and capital forces shaping the hard tech ecosystem. Links & ResourcesSpace CapitalBUILTAdAstra Talent Advisors

    Where will hard tech find the skilled manufacturing talent it needs?

  2. 26 Aug

    Is SpaceX's dominance good or bad for the hard tech ecosystem?

    What happens when one company gets so far ahead that an entire ecosystem starts depending on it? SpaceX has transformed access to orbit, but that success creates a new problem. If rideshare capacity becomes more limited and SpaceX increasingly prioritizes its own satellites, what happens to all of the companies that built their businesses around that access? And this isn't just a launch problem. TSMC shows what can happen when a dominant infrastructure provider chooses not to compete with its customers. Other technology platforms show the opposite: once you own the infrastructure, the temptation to move vertically and capture more of the value can be hard to resist. In this episode, we talk about the risks of building around a single critical provider, why enormous technical moats are so difficult to challenge, and whether scarcity ultimately creates the pressure for new competitors and business models to emerge. We also get into whether the market can solve these bottlenecks on its own, or whether some infrastructure becomes strategically important enough that policy eventually has to play a role. Episode Highlights: [00:00] What happens when one company controls access to a market? [02:38] TSMC and the value of not competing with your customers [03:51] What Apple and Amazon show about owning the platform [05:43] SpaceX's unusual position in launch and satellite connectivity [07:10] The tension between serving customers and maximizing shareholder value [08:42] Can you actually build a competitor to a massive technical moat? [11:20] Why access to space matters to the entire innovation ecosystem [13:22] The risk of building a company around one launch provider [15:14] Could launch scarcity create new markets and business models? [16:08] The opportunity for intermediaries to solve the rideshare problem [17:03] When does policy need to protect access to critical infrastructure? [18:15] Can constraints ultimately push the market toward more innovation? Key TakeawaysWhen one company controls critical infrastructure, its business decisions can affect an entire ecosystem.TSMC shows how a dominant infrastructure provider can help an ecosystem flourish by choosing not to compete with its customers.SpaceX has a different tension because launching its own satellites may eventually be more valuable than providing capacity to other companies.Technical moats in hard tech can take decades and enormous amounts of capital to overcome, making it difficult for the market to respond quickly when a bottleneck emerges.Companies building around rideshare or future Starship capacity need to think carefully about how dependent their business model is on a single provider.Limited launch capacity could create opportunities for new launch providers, rideshare intermediaries, and other business models.If the market can't provide enough access to strategically important infrastructure, policy may eventually become part of the solution. Where else in hard tech do you see a single company becoming a critical bottleneck for the rest of the ecosystem? Subscribe to VHTB for more conversations about the talent, culture, and capital forces shaping hard tech. Links & ResourcesSpace Capital: https://www.spacecapital.com/ BUILT: https://builtleaders.com/ AdAstra Talent Advisors: https://adastra.us/

    Is SpaceX's dominance good or bad for the hard tech ecosystem?

  3. 19 Aug

    Can too much discipline hurt a hard tech startup?

    How do you know when discipline has gone too far? There are good reasons to be careful with capital, hiring, and big decisions. But when the market is moving quickly, waiting too long can create its own problems. The people who want to move fast and make a difference can leave, opportunities can pass you by, and the money you raised can sit there instead of helping you get to the next milestone. In this episode, we get into the other side of discipline: what happens when founders become too restrictive with resources or too hesitant to make decisions. Matt shares what his experience in the military taught him about risk-averse cultures, Justus breaks down why different types of capital come with different expectations around risk and growth, and Brian looks at where slowing down actually makes sense, especially when it comes to hiring. A lot of it comes back to clarity. You don't need to know the answer yet, but you should know what you're trying to figure out. Once that's clear, it's much easier to decide how quickly to move, where to put your capital, and who you actually need on the team. Episode Highlights [00:00] When does too much discipline become a problem? [01:54] What happens when leaders are too slow to make decisions? [03:35] How different cultures think about risk [04:37] Why some founders raise money and then hesitate to spend it [06:13] The difference between discipline and unnecessary restriction [10:13] The venture capital treadmill founders need to understand [11:46] How do you know if you're spending too quickly or too slowly? [13:07] Why clarity matters before you start hiring [14:59] Why capital, leadership, and hiring all come back to clarity [16:14] You don't need to know the answer, but you need to know the question Episode TakeawaysMoving too slowly can be just as risky as moving too fast, especially when the market around you is changing quickly.An overly risk-averse culture can push innovative people toward places where they have more freedom to make a difference.Different types of capital come with different expectations. Venture capital is built around taking risk, moving quickly, and chasing growth.Discipline should help people make better decisions, not create unnecessary restrictions that prevent anything from getting done.Hiring is one place where slowing down can make sense. Getting clear on who you need and why you need them can save months of wasted time and resources.Clarity doesn't mean knowing the answer. It means knowing what you're trying to figure out. Are you moving at the right speed for the problem you're trying to solve? Subscribe to VHTB for more conversations about the talent, culture, and capital decisions shaping hard tech startups. Links & ResourcesSpace Capital: https://www.spacecapital.com/ BUILT: https://builtleaders.com/ AdAstra Talent Advisors: https://adastra.us/

    Can too much discipline hurt a hard tech startup?

  4. 12 Aug

    Is capital discipline a competitive advantage?

    There’s a lot of money flowing into hard tech right now. Rounds are getting bigger, companies are scaling faster, and founders have more resources to work with. But abundance creates a different set of problems. When capital is scarce, constraints force creativity. When capital is abundant, the pressure shifts toward speed. You’re expected to hire faster, secure more physical space, build more hardware, and show that the resources you raised are translating into progress. In this episode, we talk about what happens when a capital-rich market starts driving up salaries, equity packages, real estate, and expectations without necessarily creating the same increase in customer value. We also get into the leadership challenge behind all of this. How fast can you grow without lowering the hiring bar, overwhelming your team with recruiting, or getting too far ahead of actual customer demand? And when the market eventually shifts back toward scarcity, will you have built the discipline and trust to keep moving? Episode Highlights[00:00] The state of hard tech right now [01:48] Hard tech has a messaging problem [04:25] Bigger rounds are creating pressure to scale faster [05:48] The cyclical nature of venture capital [07:01] Why scarcity can create better decisions [07:37] How abundant capital is changing hardware hiring [09:31] The leadership challenge of having more money [10:30] Building a culture of disciplined spending [12:28] Are founders prepared for the next downturn? [14:28] How quickly should you actually grow your team? [16:41] Bigger checks come with bigger expectations [17:40] What investors want to see after you raise [18:21] Building trust through execution Episode TakeawaysWhy abundant capital changes how hard tech companies operateHow rapid fundraising affects hiring, salaries, and physical infrastructureThe value of a scarcity mindset even when money is availableWhy some experienced founders are raising now and preparing for the next downturnThe risk of building ahead of real customer demandHow to scale hiring without overwhelming the existing teamWhy bigger rounds come with bigger expectationsHow clear plans and consistent execution build investor trust Subscribe to VHTB for more conversations on the talent, culture, and capital forces shaping the hard tech startup ecosystem. Links & ResourcesSpace Capital: https://www.spacecapital.com/ BUILT: https://builtleaders.com/ AdAstra Talent Advisors: https://adastra.us/

    Is capital discipline a competitive advantage?

  5. 29 Jul

    Is burnout a leadership failure or an inevitable cost of building frontier tech?

    Can burnout ever be a good thing? Or is it always a sign that something's broken? When people talk about burnout, the conversation usually goes straight to long hours and impossible workloads. But is that actually what's causing it? Or is burnout sometimes a symptom of something much deeper? In this episode of VHTB, Matt Gjertsen (Built), Justus Kilian (Space Capital), and Brian Mejeur (Ad Astra Talent Advisors) continue the conversation around startup culture by asking whether burnout is actually a leadership problem or simply part of building ambitious companies. If a team starts burning out, is the workload really the issue? Or is it unclear expectations, a lack of progress, or feeling responsible for outcomes without having the authority to change them? We dig into why founders and leaders experience burnout differently than individual contributors, what burnout actually looks like inside fast-moving hard tech companies, and why intensity alone isn't necessarily the problem. We also explore how leaders can recognize the difference between healthy pressure and unhealthy culture, why some people thrive in demanding environments while others don't, and what organizations can do to push the limits without losing the people they can't afford to lose. Episode Highlights: [00:00] Is burnout a leadership failure or an inevitable part of scaling a startup? [01:48] Why founders often don't realize they're burning out until it's over [05:49] Who's burning out and why that question matters more than you think [09:11] Burnout isn't always caused by long hours [10:52] The hidden causes of burnout most leaders overlook [11:46] Why leader burnout spreads through an organization [14:37] The difference between pain, suffering, and long-term burnout [16:06] What should success actually look like for leaders? [18:37] What Special Forces can teach startups about preventing burnout Episode Takeaways: Burnout isn't always caused by workload. Lack of progress, poor communication, and unclear expectations can be just as damaging.Leaders should pay attention to who is burning out and why before assuming they have a workload problem.High-performing teams can handle intense periods of work when they believe the pressure has purpose and an end point.Burnout becomes dangerous when people stop believing things will improve.Leader burnout affects far more than one person because it shapes communication, decision-making, and team culture.Companies pushing ambitious missions should invest in strong onboarding, team cohesion, and giving people real ownership over their work.Sustainable performance comes from building systems that help people succeed, not simply asking them to work harder. Subscribe to VHTB for more conversations on the talent, culture, and capital forces shaping the hard tech startup ecosystem. Links & Resources: Space Capital: https://www.spacecapital.com/ BUILT: https://builtleaders.com/ AdAstra Talent Advisors: https://adastra.us/

    Is burnout a leadership failure or an inevitable cost of building frontier tech?

  6. 15 Jul

    How do you hire for ownership and get out of the way? | Andy Lapsa, CEO of Stoke Space

    How do you build a rocket company where speed, safety, and trust all scale at once? What does it actually take to build a fully reusable launch system in today’s space industry? Not in theory. Not in a pitch deck. But in reality. where capital is massive, the physics are unforgiving, and execution is everything. In this episode of VHTB, hosts Justus Kilian (Space Capital), Seyka Mejeur (Ad Astra Talent Advisors), and Matt Gjertsen (Built) sit down with Andy Lapsa, CEO and co-founder of Stoke Space, to unpack how one of the most ambitious new space companies is being built from the inside out. Stoke is developing a fully reusable, medium-lift launch system designed to operate more like an aircraft than a traditional rocket. But this conversation goes far beyond hardware. It’s about how you design an organization that can actually execute at that level of complexity. We dig into how Andy thinks about hiring elite talent, building trust at scale, and maintaining speed without breaking the system. He breaks down why great leadership is less about control and more about removing friction so exceptional people can operate at full capacity. The conversation also explores how Stoke structures execution internally, how priorities get set week to week, how bottlenecks are surfaced, and how leaders stay close enough to the work without becoming the constraint. From there, we go into the realities of scaling a hard-tech company: recruiting outside of major hubs, managing rapid capital inflows without distorting culture, and why conviction from investors ultimately comes down to one thing. delivering on what you said you’d do. Episode Highlights[00:00:00] What makes a rocket company actually move fast without breaking? [00:03:27] Why does speed come from people, not leadership? [00:08:15] How do you unify engineers from SpaceX, Blue Origin, and legacy aerospace? [00:10:33] How do you scale trust when the organization grows from 10 to 350+ people? [00:15:14] What does it take to keep a hard-tech company focused on the real bottlenecks? [00:18:06] Personal Operating System: Energy, Sleep, Exercise, and Sustainability [00:21:31] Stress, Burnout, and Why Over-Optimization Can Backfire [00:24:06] Hiring at Scale While Maintaining a High Talent Bar [00:29:50] Recruiting Top Talent to the Pacific Northwest & Relocation Challenges [00:32:46] Why Stoke Wins: Ownership, Learning, and Talent Density [00:37:13] AI, Software, and Building Internal Tools (BoltLine) [00:41:23] Convincing Investors in a Contrarian, Capital-Intensive Thesis [00:45:04] Surviving Bad Market Timing & Hard Fundraising Cycles [00:48:34] Building & Evaluating a Strong Cap Table (Investors as Long-Term Partners) [00:51:05] Final Advice: Ownership, Introspection, and Founder Lessons Episode Takeaways Speed is a function of people quality, not management intensityTrust is the operating system of high-performance engineering teamsThe best organizations are designed around bottlenecks, not hierarchyHiring mistakes usually come from overvaluing skill and undervaluing collaborationCapital doesn’t create execution. It amplifies whatever system already existsOwnership is the ultimate driver of performance in technical teams Subscribe to VHTB for more insights on the talent, culture, and finance sides of space startups. Resources & Links Andy Lapsa LinkedInWebsiteYouTubeX VHTB Team: Space CapitalBetter Every Day StudiosAdAstra Talent Advisors

    How do you hire for ownership and get out of the way? | Andy Lapsa, CEO of Stoke Space

  7. 8 Jul

    Can you be fully committed to a startup on a 9-to-5 schedule?

    For years, startup culture has pushed the idea that if you're not working around the clock, you're not really committed. But is that actually true? Can you be fully committed to a startup while still making time for your family? Where's the line between being mission-driven and burning people out? And how should founders think about commitment as their companies grow? In this episode of VHTB, Matt Gjertsen is joined by Justus Kilian of Space Capital and Brian Mejeur of AdAstra Talent Advisors to unpack why commitment isn't as binary as people often make it out to be. We explore what founders should expect from themselves versus their teams, why trust and autonomy matter more than hours in the office, and how great leaders create clarity around expectations instead of relying on optics. From the intensity of the earliest startup days to building organizations that can support different life stages, we discuss what sustainable, high-performing cultures actually look like, why clearly defining roles matters, and how leaders can create environments where ambitious work and life outside the office don't have to be at odds. Episode Highlights[00:00] Introduction and the question: Can someone be fully committed on an 8-to-5 schedule? [02:19] Why long hours are often about optics rather than productivity [06:23] What leaders can do to shape healthy company culture [07:00] Why founders eventually need to step away and trust their organizations [09:55] Different expectations for founders versus employees [12:22] Incentives, ownership, and why employees shouldn't be expected to think exactly like founders [15:33] How organizational structure naturally creates different levels of flexibility [16:28] When management responsibilities create burnout [18:16] Why clearly defining roles leads to healthier expectations [19:38] The importance of communication, planning, and setting expectations before critical milestones Episode TakeawaysCommitment exists on a spectrum, not as an all-or-nothing mindset.High-performing teams are built around trust, autonomy, and outcomes rather than time spent in the office.Founders and employees have different incentives, and healthy cultures acknowledge those differences.Early-stage startups may require intense commitment, but mature organizations should evolve beyond that model.Leaders shape culture by modeling the behaviors they want their teams to feel comfortable embracing.Clearly defining roles helps employees understand expectations without relying on unspoken assumptions.Companies that support different life stages are better positioned to attract and retain great talent.Management responsibilities should be intentional, not simply added on top of individual contributor work.Proactive communication prevents many of the commitment issues managers often attribute to motivation.Sustainable hard tech companies are built by creating environments where ambitious work and personal life can coexist. Subscribe to VHTB for more conversations on the talent, culture, and capital forces shaping the hard tech startup ecosystem. Links & ResourcesSpace Capital: https://www.spacecapital.com/BUILT: https://builtleaders.com/AdAstra Talent Advisors: https://adastra.us/

    Can you be fully committed to a startup on a 9-to-5 schedule?

  8. 18 Jun

    SpaceX IPO LIVE from Vegas: The Hard Tech Era Just Changed Forever

    For the first time, the VHTB crew got together to record a live episode from Las Vegas on SpaceX IPO day, watching one of the biggest moments in hard tech history unfold in real time. Joined by former SpaceX employees, founders, investors, and operators, we discuss how SpaceX became more than just a company and how its culture, talent, and lessons learned have spread throughout the industry. We also sit down with Josh Jetter, CTO of Fortastra, and Brian Taylor, Founder and CEO of Lux Aeterna, to talk about the engineering philosophies that defined their time at SpaceX, from first-principles thinking to building and testing hardware faster. Together, we explore why this IPO matters far beyond the stock market and what it could mean for the next generation of hard tech companies. From generational wealth and talent mobility to startup formation and the future of the space economy, this conversation explores the ripple effects of a milestone long in the making. Episode Highlights [00:00] Live from Las Vegas: The VHTB crew gathers on SpaceX IPO day [01:33] Justus on Space Capital's early investment thesis and the rise of Starlink [04:01] How SpaceX helped shape today's hard tech ecosystem [04:28] Why the IPO is bringing new attention to the space economy [05:43] "The future is underpriced" and the long-term opportunity in frontier technology [07:31] The overlooked stories of welders, technicians, mechanics, and builders [11:20] Josh Jetter on SpaceX's culture of first-principles thinking [12:12] The SpaceX alumni network and its influence across the industry [15:03] Brian Taylor on lessons learned building Starlink [16:03] Building, testing, and learning faster through hardware-rich development [18:15] What happens when experienced operators become founders [20:06] Closing reflections on the future of hard tech after the SpaceX IPO Episode Takeaways SpaceX's impact extends far beyond rockets, influencing how an entire generation of founders and operators approach hard tech.The company's culture of first-principles thinking continues to spread through startups founded by former employees.Large liquidity events can create generational wealth for builders across every level of an organization not just executives and founders.Successful outcomes reinforce the value of equity and strengthen recruiting for early-stage companies.The SpaceX IPO serves as a powerful validation point for hard tech and hardware-focused businesses.Access to capital, talent mobility, and operational experience could accelerate the next wave of startup formation.Building and testing hardware quickly often produces better outcomes than over-optimizing through analysis alone.The space economy is still in its early stages, with significant opportunities emerging beyond launch and communications.Resource constraints can drive better decision-making, even as companies and individuals become more financially successful.The next chapter of hard tech will likely be shaped by operators applying lessons learned at companies like SpaceX to entirely new markets. Subscribe to VHTB for more conversations on the people, companies, and ideas shaping the future of hard tech. Special Guest: Brian Taylor of Lux AeternaJosh Jetter of Fortastra Links & ResourcesSpace CapitalBUILTAdAstra Talent Advisors

    SpaceX IPO LIVE from Vegas: The Hard Tech Era Just Changed Forever
See All (51)

About

VHTB is your guide to the talent, culture, and capital forces shaping the hard tech startup ecosystem. Each episode, hosts Justus Kilian of Space Capital, Seyka, and Brian Mejeur of AdAstra Talent Advisors, and Matt Gjertsen of BUILT bring stories and lessons from the front lines of building and backing some of the most innovative companies on the planet.

Information

You Might Also Like