Unsolicited Response Dale Peterson: ICS Security Catalyst and S4 Conference Chair

Chris Hughes and Nikki Robinson recently wrote the book Effective Vulnerability Management. Dale and Chris discuss the topic and book including:
The definition and scope of vulnerabilities. It’s much more than coding errors that need patches.
Are ICS protocols lacking authentication “vulnerabilities”
The reality that most organizations have 100’s of thousands of unpatched vulnerabilities. Some statistics and will this change.
Ways to prioritize what vulnerabilities you address.
The SSVC decision tree approach that was introduced at S4 as Never, Next, Now
Tooling … vulnerability management, software configuration, ticketing, remediation.
And much more.
 
Links:
Effective Vulnerability Management, https://www.amazon.com/Effective-Vulnerability-Management-Vulnerable-Ecosystem/dp/1394221207/
Dale’s ICS-Patch Decision Tree, https://dale-peterson.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ICS-Patch-0_1.pdf
 

Waterfall Security Solutions and ICSSTRIVE put out an annual threat report that Dale Peterson believes is the best in OT. Why? It only includes incidents that had physical consequences on systems monitored and controlled by OT. 
Dale and Andrew discuss:
What is in and out of scope for the report.
The breakdown of the 68 incidents that occurred in 2023 by industry sector, cause, threat actor and more.
The impact reporting requirements may have on these numbers in the future.
What percentage of OT cyber incidents with physical consequences are made public.
Ransomware on IT causing physical consequences, exfil v. encryption, and what asset owners should do given this represents 80% of the known incidents in the report.
And more.
Links:
2024 Threat Report: https://waterfall-security.com/ot-insights-center/ot-cybersecurity-insights-center/2024-threat-report-ot-cyberattacks-with-physical-consequences/ 
ICSSTRIVE: https://icsstrive.com
S4 Events YouTube Channel: https://youtube.com/s4events

Patrick Miller has OT cybersecurity experience as an asset owner, PacificCorp. As a regulator and one of the first NERC CIP auditors with WECC. As a community organizer creating and leading EnergySec and the BeerISAC. And as an entrepreneur creating and leading a number of consulting practices. He is currently the Founder of Ampyx Cyber.
 
In this episode Patrick and Dale discuss:
Why Patrick changed the company name and selected Talinn as the location for the new European office.
The major differences in approaches to OT cybersecurity and risk management between Europe and the US. (more than just regulatory differences)
What has the EU learned or improved on regulation from NERC CIP.
What is the current state of NERC CIP regulatory risk? Are the regulated entities understanding and meeting the standards’ requirements?
The challenge of slow NERC CIP modifications, eg virtualization and cloud.
Bad standard & good regulator v. good standard & bad regulator.
Should water follow the NERC CIP model as recommended by AWWA?
How Patrick is dealing with AI.
 
Links
Ampyx Cyber: https://ampyxcyber.com
Patrick’s Critical Assets Podcast: https://amperesec.com/podcast
Subscribe to Dale’s ICS Security Friday News & Notes: https://friday.dale-peterson.com/signup
Advertise on Unsolicited Response: https://dale-peterson.com/advertising/ 
 

Emma Stewart joins Dale to discuss the 3 big OT & ICS security stories from the first quarter. They end by giving their win, fail and prediction for Q1.