Beyond The Horizon Bobby Capucci

In recent years, Mexican drug cartels have increasingly started to cultivate coca, the plant from which cocaine is derived, within Mexico's borders. This shift marks a significant change in the dynamics of the cocaine supply chain, traditionally dominated by South American countries, particularly Colombia, Peru, and Bolivia. The primary reasons and implications for this development are:
Diversification and Control: By growing coca in Mexico, cartels can gain more control over the production process, reduce dependency on South American suppliers, and potentially increase profits by managing the entire supply chain from cultivation to distribution.Adaptation to Law Enforcement: Heightened efforts by law enforcement in South America and at international borders have pressured cartels to find alternative methods to sustain their operations. Cultivating coca domestically helps mitigate risks associated with the interdiction of smuggled drugs.Experimental and Pilot Projects: Initial cultivation efforts are often experimental, aimed at understanding the viability of coca growth in Mexican climates and soils. Reports suggest that cartels are testing various regions to identify the best conditions for coca cultivation.Economic Factors: The economic benefits of coca cultivation in Mexico are substantial. By producing cocaine domestically, cartels can lower costs and enhance their ability to compete with South American producers.Impact on Local Communities: The establishment of coca plantations in Mexico can have profound effects on local communities, potentially leading to increased violence, corruption, and economic shifts as cartels assert control over new territories.Environmental Concerns: Coca cultivation can also lead to environmental degradation, including deforestation and soil depletion, as cartels clear land to plant coca.
(commercial at 12:50)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DEA: Cartels now growing coca in Mexico | WETM - MyTwinTiers.com

A memorandum in opposition to a motion to dismiss is a legal document filed by a party (usually the plaintiff) in response to a defendant's motion to dismiss the case. This memorandum aims to convince the court to deny the defendant's request to dismiss the case. Here are the key components typically included in such a memorandum:
Introduction: Briefly outlines the purpose of the memorandum and the main arguments against the motion to dismiss.Statement of Facts: Provides a concise overview of the relevant facts of the case, emphasizing those that support the plaintiff's position.Legal Standard: Explains the legal standard that the court should apply when considering the motion to dismiss. This usually involves showing that the complaint states a plausible claim for relief under the applicable law.Argument: The core of the memorandum, this section presents detailed legal arguments as to why the motion to dismiss should be denied. It often includes:Legal Precedents: Citing relevant case law and statutes that support the plaintiff's position.Application of Law to Facts: Demonstrating how the facts of the case meet the legal requirements to proceed with the claim.Counterarguments: Addressing and refuting the arguments made by the defendant in their motion to dismiss.Conclusion: Summarizes the main points and requests the court to deny the motion to dismiss.
(commercial at 8:59)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.611545.61.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A memorandum in opposition to a motion to dismiss is a legal document filed by a party (usually the plaintiff) in response to a defendant's motion to dismiss the case. This memorandum aims to convince the court to deny the defendant's request to dismiss the case. Here are the key components typically included in such a memorandum:
Introduction: Briefly outlines the purpose of the memorandum and the main arguments against the motion to dismiss.Statement of Facts: Provides a concise overview of the relevant facts of the case, emphasizing those that support the plaintiff's position.Legal Standard: Explains the legal standard that the court should apply when considering the motion to dismiss. This usually involves showing that the complaint states a plausible claim for relief under the applicable law.Argument: The core of the memorandum, this section presents detailed legal arguments as to why the motion to dismiss should be denied. It often includes:Legal Precedents: Citing relevant case law and statutes that support the plaintiff's position.Application of Law to Facts: Demonstrating how the facts of the case meet the legal requirements to proceed with the claim.Counterarguments: Addressing and refuting the arguments made by the defendant in their motion to dismiss.Conclusion: Summarizes the main points and requests the court to deny the motion to dismiss.
(commercial at 9:36)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.611545.61.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Four years after the murder of notorious mobster Whitey Bulger, the federal government has announced charges against three men. However, there is much more to the story and many questions still have yet to be answered. So, let's dive in and have a look!

(commercial at 16:24)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/whitey-bulger-killers-were-tipped-off-about-mobster-s-prison-arrival-and-murdered-him-within-six-minutes/ar-AA113zVG?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=f442b6caec274460b9b5137d95420961

Asa Ellerup, the wife of the accused Long Island serial killer Rex Heuermann, says that she will be standing in her man's corner until she see's all the evidence for herself.   This is a pretty big u-turn from her initial reaction and there are many questions about what what prompt her to reverse course.  

I'm sure there isn't any sort of financial incentive, right?

Let's dive in and see what's up!


(commercial at 7:24)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Rex Heuermann’s wife says she’s ‘given him the benefit of the doubt’ over Gilgo Beach murders | The Independent

There is no denying that the situation at the southern border of the United States is FUBAR and that serious changes need to be made. However, the politicians in this country continue to kick the can down the road, hoping that the problems will just fix themselves. Well, they won't. Just ask the family of Laken Riley.


Laken Riley, a nursing student at the University of Georgia was murdered while jogging near the school and the man that the police say is responsible for the murder Juan Antonio Ibarra, came here illegally. Not only that, but he has had multiple run ins with the law and yet even with those infractions was still walking around free in the community, once again shining a light on how broken the system is.


In this episode, we take a look at what went down and the firestorm that has arisen from the fallout.



(commercial at 10:27)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Suspect in Georgia nursing student Laken Riley's death accused of 'disfiguring' skull: affidavit | Fox News