316 episodios

Mark Henkel is the National Polygamy Advocate ™, presenting polygamy to the public for over 25 years to show why your own values compel you to repeal all Big Government Marriage Control laws that anti-Constitutionally ban UCAP, Unrelated Consenting Adult Polygamy.
.
In consideration for his participation in all media interviews, all such interviews were conducted under the irrevocable terms and conditions that Mark Henkel retained and retains full and complete rights to broadcast elsewhere any of such interviews on any media in which he participated.
.
http://NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nationalpolygamyadvocate/support

National Polygamy Advocate Mark Henkel

    • Cultura y sociedad

Mark Henkel is the National Polygamy Advocate ™, presenting polygamy to the public for over 25 years to show why your own values compel you to repeal all Big Government Marriage Control laws that anti-Constitutionally ban UCAP, Unrelated Consenting Adult Polygamy.
.
In consideration for his participation in all media interviews, all such interviews were conducted under the irrevocable terms and conditions that Mark Henkel retained and retains full and complete rights to broadcast elsewhere any of such interviews on any media in which he participated.
.
http://NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nationalpolygamyadvocate/support

    The Ten Commandments Movie - Corrections -1- Apr 2024

    The Ten Commandments Movie - Corrections -1- Apr 2024

    National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares Part 1 of "Corrections" to the 1956 movie, "The Ten Commandments." Christians and others watch that TV movie each year on Resurrection Sunday (aka "Easter"), even though the topic of the movie is actually NOT about the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Mark Henkel had watched this movie back on April 3, 1994, and recently again on March 31, 2024. This podcast Episode #316 was released on April 3, 2024 - exactly 30 years after he had watched the movie back on April 3, 1994. Starting this multi-part mini-series, Mark Henkel also teases that these corrections do specifically connect to the movement of Christian Polygamy which led to the overall movement of UCAP, Unrelated Consenting Adult Polygamy.

    ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠


    ---

    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nationalpolygamyadvocate/support

    • 4 min
    The 7th year of Weekly Podcasts BEGINS - Mar 2024

    The 7th year of Weekly Podcasts BEGINS - Mar 2024

    National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel begins the coming 7th year of weekly episodes of this podcast. Since the actual 6th Year Anniversary of March 21, 2024, this episode formally begins this next year of episodes. Mark Henkel shares some sincerely personal information, references some of the ongoing subtopics that will continue, and invites listeners to share ideas that could be addressed in future episodes of this podcast.

    ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠


    ---

    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nationalpolygamyadvocate/support

    • 4 min
    Celebrating 6 Years of National Polygamy Advocate Podcast - Mar 2024

    Celebrating 6 Years of National Polygamy Advocate Podcast - Mar 2024

    National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel personally celebrates the milestone of 6 years of weekly episodes of this podcast. The podcast’s first episode premiered on March 21, 2018. Mark Henkel also celebrates the new 1 year anniversary since the podcast transformed from archiving his numerous past media interviews into being directly-spoken tools for history, teaching, lessons-learned, personal details, and more.

    ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠


    ---

    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nationalpolygamyadvocate/support

    • 5 min
    SCOTUS Decision: Reynolds v. United States of 1878 -5- Mar 2024

    SCOTUS Decision: Reynolds v. United States of 1878 -5- Mar 2024

    National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares the 4th of the 6 Questions that the Supreme Court of the United States addressed in (this Part 5 of this multi-part mini-series regarding) Reynolds v. United States Decision of 1878. That "Question 4" to be determined by the Supreme Court in the case, asked, "4. Was the testimony of Amelia Jane Schofield, given at a former trial for the same offence, but under another indictment, improperly admitted in evidence?” This is the episode that asks all listeners to "Imagine a world where your wife or husband -against their will- could be compelled to testify against YOU for marrying YOU!"

    ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠


    ---

    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nationalpolygamyadvocate/support

    • 16 min
    SCOTUS Decision Reynolds V. United States of 1878 -RECAP 123- Mar 2024

    SCOTUS Decision Reynolds V. United States of 1878 -RECAP 123- Mar 2024

    National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares the RECAP of Questions #1, #2, and #3 of the 6 Questions that the Supreme Court of the United States addressed in (this RECAP 123 of this multi-part mini-series regarding) Reynolds v. United States Decision of 1878. By having this consolidated understanding of the first half of the 6 Questions, listeners will be hereby more prepared to contemplate the next 3 Questions to be shared in future coming podcast episodes.

    ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠


    ---

    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nationalpolygamyadvocate/support

    • 4 min
    SCOTUS Decision: Reynolds v. United States of 1878 -4- Feb 2024

    SCOTUS Decision: Reynolds v. United States of 1878 -4- Feb 2024

    National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares the 3nd of the 6 Questions that the Supreme Court of the United States addressed in (this Part 4 of this multi-part mini-series regarding) Reynolds v. United States Decision of 1878. That "Question 3" to be determined by the Supreme Court in the case, asked, “3. Were the challenges of certain other jurors by the government improperly sustained?” Chief Justice Waite's response continued yet again with the same clever nuanced word-game, applying a double-standard in hypocrisy that revealed the Court's bias.

    ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠


    ---

    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nationalpolygamyadvocate/support

    • 13 min

Top podcasts de Cultura y sociedad

The Wild Project
Jordi Wild
A solas... con Vicky Martín Berrocal
Podium Podcast
Punzadas Sonoras
Radio Primavera Sound
El lado oscuro
Danny McFly
LO QUE TÚ DIGAS con Alex Fidalgo
Alex Fidalgo
Crims
Catalunya Ràdio