70 episodios

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments Oyez

    • Gobierno
    • 5,0 • 1 valoración

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

    Thornell v. Jones

    Thornell v. Jones

    A case in which the Court will clarify the methodology for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington.

    • 1h 4 min
    Fischer v. United States

    Fischer v. United States

    A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c), which prohibits obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations, includes acts unrelated to investigations and evidence.

    • 1h 40 min
    Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio

    Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio

    A case in which the Court will decide whether a Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claim can proceed as to a baseless criminal charge so long as other charges brought alongside the baseless charge are supported by probable cause.

    • 58 min
    Snyder v. United States

    Snyder v. United States

    A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) criminalizes gratuities, i.e., payments in recognition of actions a state or local official has already taken or committed to take, without any quid pro quo agreement to take those actions.

    • 1h 38 min
    Connelly v. United States

    Connelly v. United States

    A case in which the Court will decide whether the proceeds of a life insurance policy taken out by a closely held corporation on a shareholder in order to facilitate the redemption of the shareholder’s stock should be considered a corporate asset when calculating the value of the shareholder’s shares for purposes of the federal estate tax.

    • 53 min
    Erlinger v. United States

    Erlinger v. United States

    A case in which the Court will decide whether the Constitution requires a jury trial and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant’s prior convictions were “committed on occasions different from one another,” as is necessary to impose an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act.

    • 1h 33 min

Reseñas de clientes

5,0 de 5
1 valoración

1 valoración

Top podcasts de Gobierno

No es el fin del mundo
El Orden Mundial
El orden mundial en Julia en la onda
OndaCero
HARDtalk
BBC World Service
Solo Documental
BANUS
Food for Europe
European Commission, Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
FLORES EN EL CONGO
Luis Flores - VETERINARIO

Quizá también te guste

Divided Argument
Will Baude, Dan Epps
Amarica's Constitution
Akhil Reed Amar
We the People
National Constitution Center
Cases and Controversies
Bloomberg Law
Strict Scrutiny
Crooked Media
SCOTUS 101
The Heritage Foundation

Más de Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Announcements
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2011 Term Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2010 Term Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2012 Term Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments
Oyez