What is creation science? As a student in middle school, Felice Gerwitz learned about evolution and it didn’t line up with her mother’s teaching of God and the creation of the world. Years later the Lord provided a lady, who would go on to be her co-author on the Creation Science study guide series and the person instrumental in her education on the topic. This podcast is a labor of love. It is the years spent in recording and teaching on the so important topic of God’s wonderful creation!
Climate Change The Real Story
Climate Change - The Real Story with Special Guest Dr. Jay Wile ~ Episode 25
We want to be good stewards of our environment, but the climate change advocates keep changing the definitions. So, today I have a noted scientist, Dr. Jay Wile who will take some of the mystery out of climate change and explain it in a way that we can understand!
*One main point near the end of the broadcast will shock you!
Dr. Jay Wile has a Ph.D. from the University of Rochester in nuclear chemistry and a B.S. in chemistry from the same institution. He has won several awards for excellence in teaching and has presented numerous lectures on the topics of Nuclear Chemistry, Christian Apologetics, Homeschooling, and Creation vs. Evolution. He has articles on these subjects in nationally recognized journals and has authored or co-authored thirteen award-winning science textbooks designed to be used in a homeschool setting. Books by Dr. Jay.
Climate Change Articles - Search Climate change of Dr. Jay's blog - here is the search results.
Scientists created computer models of climate that were predicting warming. And as they were tracking the warming of the globe the models did not show this huge increase as per predictions and scientific models. The theory was as the years progressed the computer models and data collection would show definitely that the earth was indeed warming and it would be a huge problem for people on earth. The problem was the globe has not warmed much, so it's been hard to convince people that it is a problem. The greatest warming took place before the 1970s.
Here are some things we know about global warming. The globe has not warmed enough so in essence the science now focuses on a new term, "climate change." The theory is the carbon dioxide is not warming the planet but due to the carbon energy it is trapping it is causing the extreme weather we are seeing. There is evidence that the earth has warmed a little bit since the mid-1800s. Long before the build-up of carbon dioxide. The question is what has caused it, and scientifically we really don't know. We do know that carbon dioxide traps heat.
The big question is the "equilibrium climate sensitivity" and that is a question we will address in this broadcast. It is the single most important piece of data related to climate change, and therefore the question that should be asked and is often avoided or even unknown by many of the politicians campaigning on this topic.
What is it? In Dr. Jay Wile's own words: "Equilibrium climate sensitivity is defined as how much will global temperatures increase if the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere doubles." And that question is completely unanswered. It is somewhere between zero degrees and 3.5 degrees. There is no trend! Some studies show a very very low equilibrium climate sensitivity so we could easily double the carbon dioxide and nothing significant would happen other studies produce a very large climate sensitivity which means everything gets really hot and bad things to happen.
The most recent studies show no one agrees. If that single more important question what is equilibrium climate sensitivity can not be answered scientifically then you can't say scientifically that global warming is a problem. You just can't!
Anything we do in the short term can't produce a long term effect. It will be making a minor difference. That is just standard scientific reasoning. I can't take a short term action and produce a significant long term effect. For example Paris climate accord.
Junk DNA and EpiGenetics Episode 24 with Dr. Jay Wile
What is Junk DNA and how does the study in epigenetics show that scientists are still confounded as a creator God is definitely evident. Special guest, Dr. Jay Wile shares his expertise!
Visit Dr. Jay Wile, who has a Ph.D. in nuclear chemistry and he's also the author of several different science series. Visit his website.
Thanks to our Sponsor, The Star Movie now out on DVD!
Experience The Star again December 7 and 8 in select theaters! Back by popular demand, you and your family can celebrate the true meaning behind the season. Be sure to check out all of the great resources for your family to use this holiday season! There are discussion guides, along with tons of FREE downloadable activities! Don’t wait, get your tickets today!
Find a theater near you at thestarmovie-tickets.com
What is Junk DNA?
For years, since the early seventies, junk DNA has been a staple of evolutionary thinking. Back in the 70s, we didn't know a lot about DNA. The only stuff we really knew about DNA was parts of DNA contain these recipes for the cells. And it tells the cells how to make a particular kind of chemical called a protein. And that those recipes make up about 2% of DNA. And as far as we knew back the other 98% must be just useless junk. Evolution has had a ready explanation for why there's junk DNA because after all, evolution is driven by mutations and mutations are random. They tend to destroy information much more than produced new information.
So if I've got a whole bunch of mutations, they're mostly going to be degrading DNA. They're not going to be improving it. So there must be a lot of DNA that got degraded from these mutations. But of course, the organism has to carry it along anyway. So the higher evolved an organism is the more junk DNA it should have. And so it's not surprising according to evolutionists that 98% of the human genome is junk because we're a very highly evolved species. Evolution had to make a lot of mistakes before it made us. And so a lot of those mistakes are reflected in the junk DNA. And that was a real popular view. Eventually, junk DNA became an engine for evolution because initially, evolution thought is that if you have a protein, you have a gene and a mutation occurs, maybe that mutation can make it a little better.
And if a series of mutations over a long period of time can take one gene and turn it into a completely new gene over time, evolution has found, well, the biochemical data doesn't support that. We don't see lots of little steps in genes and it's extremely hard to understand how I can take a gene that the organism needs and mutate it to into something else and lose what it was originally coded for. So the thought was, well, if I've got all this junk DNA lying around, it's just free to mutate, it's not going to affect anything. And magical new genes can come out of that junk DNA. And by the early nineties, it was thought that the vast majority of evolution comes from this junk DNA.
Computer Junk DNA Simulations
A computer program called Avida is sort of the gold standard in computer simulations of evolution. In order for Avida to get evolution to happen at all, 85% of the genome of these organisms has to be junk because that's where all the good stuff is coming from. Then a problem occurred. If the junk isn't being used, then it's free to mutate and eventually you'll get something wonderful, right? In theory,
Exciting Creation News
Exciting Creation News ~ Episode 23
It is a fabulous time to be a creation scientist, especially with the exciting Creation Science News! Join Felice Gerwitz and Dr. Jay Wile, an author and acclaimed scientist who will discuss why this is a great time to be a Creation Scientist.
Thanks to our sponsor, Media Angels, and the Truth Seekers Mystery Series
Dr. Jay Wile - Learn more about here on his website and his blog.
Dr. Jay L. Wile, who holds an earned PhD in nuclear chemistry. He is best known as the author of award-winning elementary, junior and senior high school science courses including the Science through HisStory, “Discovering Design with…”, and “Exploring Creation with…” series.
Exciting Creation News:
There's an enormous amount of scientific work that keeps confirming creationist predictions. Some of it's coming from the secular scientific community, but some of it is coming from the creationist community as well. And that's probably the most exciting aspect.
Creationists used to be focused and still are focused on talking to the common person, the laypeople and letting them know, hey, look, science, that doesn't support evolution in the way people, some people claim it does. And that's a very important part of creationism.
And obviously I do that in my textbooks, but science moves forward when scientists do research about new things. For a long time, there just weren't enough creationists. There wasn't any money in creation, in research and so forth. So there wasn't much actual research going on. But nowadays, creationists are doing experiments. Some of them are publishing in the secular literature, like Dr. John Sanford, is publishing several genetic studies in the standard secular literature.
Exciting Creation News:
The audio has details about the following:
* H1N1 virus showed that natural selection doesn't weed out the harmful mutations.
* But that's not what we see in the data. Fischer’s Theorem—which mathematically supports evolution in secular literature doesn't work.
* Nylon digesting bacteria - thought they were new genes - but it was natural genes. This is fascinating and a lot of this is confirming predictions that creationists have made for years.
* Human genome project - and there's a really famous scientist named Dr. Dan Graur. He says, if the findings are right, then evolution is wrong because there is no way evolution can maintain 80% of the human genome. (Read more about this on Dr. Wile’s blog here.) This has confirmed creation prediction and it goes way, way counter to everything evolutionists have taught us since the ‘70s when it comes to the human genome.
What Makes A Theory Scientific
What makes a theory scientific isn't that it explains the data. It's not that it makes sense. What makes a theory scientific is it can be used to predict data that are not known because that's how you really decide whether a theory is useful and whether or not it's close to reality. Because if it can make a prediction about something that is not known and then it's investigated, it turns out that prediction is true. That gives you a lot of support for the theory
More Exciting Creation News:
* Dinosaur bones tested have been found to have C14
* This indicates that the maximum age is about 30,000 years old. Now, we think it is less than that because carbon 14, is very difficult to get a solid done number beyond 3000...
Yellowstone – Earth History
Yellowstone National Park - A Window into Earth History Episode 22
Yellowstone is the gateway to understanding earth history, in this episode we'll listen to Patrick Nurre as he shares information about the park and the earth.
Thanks to our sponsor Media Angels, Inc and the Truth Seekers Mystery.
Yellowstone National Park is America’s first national park signed into law in 1872 by U.S. Grant, 18th President of the United States.
The Park is 2.2 million acres, amounting to over 3,400 square miles of forest, mountain ranges, several lakes, 10,000 thermal features, 300 waterfalls and over 300 geysers. It is a veritable laboratory for getting a window into the past geological history of Earth. It is a testament to the Genesis Flood and its aftermath.
The origin of the word Yellowstone is unknown. Many think Yellowstone got its name from the altered and colored lava of the Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone, most of which is colored a variety of yellow hues due to hydrothermal (or hot water) alteration within the canyon walls.
Yellowstone National Park is a small part of a much larger ecosystem. This ecosystem contains the greatest amount of fossil trees in the world, the largest fresh water lake in the US at altitudes over 7,000 feet, the largest concentration of geysers in the world, a vast glacially sculpted landscape and quite possibly the largest concentrated amount of volcanic ejecta in the world to have been erupted by volcanoes (9,000 cubic miles of volcanic material). To give you an idea of just how big that is, Mt. St. Helens erupted just .25 cubic miles of volcanic material in 1980.
Yellowstone is actually part of a greater volcanic feature dubbed a “supervolcano.” The main crater of Yellowstone is 45 miles long and 35 miles wide. Mt. St. Helens, by comparison, left a crater 1 mile wide and a ½ mile deep.
No one knows for sure what lies underneath Yellowstone. Geologists estimate that there is initially a depth of about 1-2 miles of a special type of volcanic rock called rhyolite, produced by explosive volcanoes. In addition, the temperatures just 400-500 feet below the surface are very hot.
There is no doubt that if one of these giants were to erupt today, it would have a devastating effect on our biotic globe and climate. Many geologists have proposed a sort of an ice age that would creep over several parts of our Earth.
Some ask if Yellowstone will erupt again. Despite what Hollywoood says, the official park literature states that they do not expect any kind of an eruption within the next 10,000 years. The closest eruption of any magnitude in our recent Earth history was in 1815 with the eruption of Mt. Tambora in Indonesia. 1816 has been called, “The year without a summer,” as freezing temperatures, and snow and crop failure were reported in June of 1816 throughout many parts of the world. There have been many such eruptions in Earth’s geological past – the Mammoth Lakes Caldera in eastern California and the La Garita Caldera in southwest Colorado were two of the largest.
What would have produced this violent volcanic eruption? The Yellowstone eruption is a bit of a mystery in modern geology. It does not fit the typical plan for volcanic activity. Scientists tell us that most of Earth’s volcanoes lie along cracks in the Earth called The Ring of Fire. These cracks are labeled as the edges of shifting plates, as modern geology describes them. But Yellowstone does not lie along any edge of a plate. It is thousands of miles from The Ring of Fire. This is also true of the Hawaiian Islands, themselves made of many volcanic eruptions. Yellowstone nevertheless is a huge crack or hole in the Earth.
Rock Strata and Fossils
Rock Strata and the Fossils in Geology Episode 21
Does rock strata and the fossils in geology show anything important? Absolutely in this presentation with Patrick Nurre, he'll share the scientific basis of this and key information.
The study of rock layers in secular geology and what they mean is called stratigraphy. The study of the fossils as they appear in the rock layers is called biostratigraphy. The literal rendering of the Greek word stratigraphy is layer writing.
A good book on this subject is The Key to Earth History – An Introduction to Stratigraphy, (by Peter Doyle, Matthew R. Bennett, and Alistair N. Baxter, 1994). The whole premise of secular stratigraphy is that the physical history of the Earth is written in the rock layers. Secular geologists believe that they can discern and write the history of the Earth by studying the rock layers. Remember, however, that there are no words or dates written in the rocks. There is no history book or history revealed or recorded. The rock layers must be interpreted. And that involves human reasoning and ideas. Science is that which can be observed, tested and repeated. Science should ask the question, “Has anyone ever observed these rock layers in the process of forming? Has anyone ever seen the rock layers accumulate with petrified remains?”
Rock layers are just that, rock layers. We can tell what kind of sedimentary rock is contained in the layers, and we can often identify the fossils in the rocks. But the rock layers do not tell us how old they are or how they got that way. That deals with the realm of history. History deals with one-time unique events recorded by eyewitnesses or written documents. Secularists interpret the history of rock layers using a particular philosophical framework that they claim gives us or writes a history of the Earth.
From a secular perspective, stratigraphy is the key to Earth history. History should ask the question, “Has anyone seen this process or know of a record or eyewitness account of this process?” The Biblical account gives a fairly detailed and historical record of an event that can explain the rock layers and the fossils in them. Modern geology does not have this kind of record. The secularist constructs the story as he/she believes it happened based on a purely naturalistic paradigm. The Biblicist, on the other hand, looks at the written record of the Bible and uses it to interpret the history of the rocks and fossils. Therefore, we don’t make up the explanation as we go but frame it according to these very old written records.
These rock layers with fossils in them have never actually been observed in their formative process. Coming at the problem from a whole different perspective – Biblical history, the rock strata containing the fossils can easily be explained by a creation and global flood. It is a historical question. How the rock layers got that way cannot be solved by science because there was no observation involved.
Secular scientists believe that the rock layers containing fossils can not only be dated by these fossils but also that evolutionary history is contained in the rock layers and can be ascertained by studying the fossils. Bio means life. And it is the life that is preserved as fossils in the rock layers that secular geologists believe tell the story of evolution over millions of years.
By the late 1800s, the study of fossils and the rock layers were so thoroughly intertwined, that it is now impossible in modern geology to study one without the other. A belief in evolution tells us how old the fossils are and therefore how old the rocks are.
How did rock layers come to be interpreted as millions of years of Earth history? The Father of Modern Geology,
Evolution Taught To Kids
Evolution Taught To Kids As Truth ~ Episode
I've heard it all! Evolution has nothing to do with a kid's faith. But when evolution is taught to kids as truth the problems begin. It is one of the reasons that kids leave their faith as they get older. There are many excuses given for how a kid raised in a Christian, God-loving home can leave their faith behind. Maybe the kids never believed. Maybe they didn't really mean it when they accepted the Lord as their personal Savior. Maybe they didn't make their faith their own, or they weren't really "saved." No one can answer this question other than the person who once believed and now doesn't.
In my experience talking to hundreds of parents in the years since I co-authored my first book on the topic of Creation, in 1994 the common theme was, evolution. The child bought into the lie taught as fact in the schools they attended. The biggest question I've asked is why is a theory taught as a fact? I think the answer is as varied as the person asking the question. Again, the common theme is because the "other" (Creationism) is faith and evolution is science. Evolution is a theory. It is not a scientific law.
In fact on further examination evolution contradicts scientific laws like Thermodynamics. But of course, we sweep this under the rug. Upon digging deeper we also learn that Darwinian evolution is discounted (because the fossil record never substantiated Darwin's theory) and neo-Darwinism is in. Or is it? Now scientists think neo-Darwinism is in need of a replacement.
Many Christian households teach a Biblical Creation as stated in Genesis 1: God created... and many also are at a loss on how to fit their faith into evolution. News Flash! You don't have to "fit" faith into evolution because evolution is a lie. Is there microevolution, changes within a kind. Absolutely. But macroevolution - goo to you by way of the zoo is a myth. Now scientists realize that what they thought was DNA "junk" randomly evolving human genome can't happen. In fact, 95% of human genomes can not evolve. Really? We knew this. So, why do evolutionists keep insisting that Genesis is a myth?
Evolution Taught To Kids as Truth - The Problem
Once kids are taught that evolution is a "valid" theory (aka educated guess) kids think their parents lied, or worse. They park their faith at the door and feel that maybe Genesis is the fairy tale. In my many years of study into creationism and evolution, I learned that kids need to be taught both of the faith systems because truthfully both are based upon faith. We have faith in the unseen, we were not present when God created the world and we were not present when the big-bang or whatever other theory started the world, and from this disorder came order - and everything in between. There are many theories of origins and as demonstrated earlier, they keep changing. Some Christian believe that Almighty God chose to begin the world by evolution (Theistic Evolutionists).
So much of this has been debated and truthfully, it is up to each one of you to make this determination on your own. But, I'm warning you, if your kids are brought up with a strong faith and yet believe in evolution as a theory of molecules-to-man, they will be hard-pressed to defend their faith when they are in higher education. My co-author on the Creation Science Series, Jill Whitlock use to lament that those who believed in Theistic Evolution were lost, souls. I don't go that far. Sure, you can believe in God, have a relationship with the Almighty and still believe in evolution. But what a loss.