Lane v. Franks U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments

    • 政府

A case in which the Court held that a public employee's truthful testimony under subpoena in a trial is citizen speech and thus cannot be used to terminate the employee.

A case in which the Court held that a public employee's truthful testimony under subpoena in a trial is citizen speech and thus cannot be used to terminate the employee.

關於政府的熱門 Podcast

The Real Story
BBC World Service
Interpreting India
Carnegie India
Pekingology
Center for Strategic and International Studies
Law Report
ABC listen
Westminster Hour
BBC Radio 4
施政報告速遞
RTHK.HK

Oyez的更多節目

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Announcements
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2010 Term Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2011 Term Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2012 Term Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments
Oyez