Compliance Perspectives

SCCE

An SCCE Podcast

  1. 1 दिन पहले

    Wendy Evans and Georgina Heasman on Interviewing the Subject of an Investigation [Podcasts]

    By Adam Turteltaub There are few parts of an investigation that are more stressful than the interview with the investigation’s subject.  Done right it can close all the loops.  Done wrong, everything can unravel. To learn how to handle things best we turn in the second of our two podcasts on investigations to Wendy Evans, Senior Corporate Ethics Investigator, Lockheed Martin and Georgina Heasman, Senior Manager, Global Investigations at Booking Holdings.  The two of them are the co-authors of our new book Fundamentals of Investigations:  A Practical Guide  and lead our Fundamentals of Compliance Investigations Workshop. In this podcast they offer a host of great insights including: While it’s generally best to interview the subject last, there are times, such as in cases of alleged harassment or data theft, where you likely will need to sit down for a preliminary interview sooner Be sure to get a read on the subject and be respectful of the stress that they are under, including giving them psychological space before asking tough questions Clarify your role in the process as a collector of facts and that you have not already decided that they are guilty Invite them to share their perspective both in the interview and, if other things come to mind, afterwards Remind them of the confidentiality of the process and the need to focus on the allegation, not who made it Listen in to learn more, and be sure to investigate their book Fundamentals of Investigations:  A Practical Guide  and the Fundamentals of Compliance Investigations Workshop.

    15 मिनट
  2. 6 दिन पहले

    Georgina Heasman and Wendy Evans on Best Practices for Investigations [Podcasts]

    By Adam Turteltaub Few people know more about conducting a compliance investigation than Georgina Heasman, Senior Manager, Global Investigations at Booking Holdings and Wendy Evans, Senior Corporate Ethics Investigator, Lockheed Martin.  The two of them are the co-authors of our new book Fundamentals of Investigations:  A Practical Guide  and lead our Fundamentals of Compliance Investigations Workshop. Not wanting to miss out on their expertise, we scheduled two podcasts with them. In this, the first of the two, they share a broad overview of best practices for conducting investigations.  Those include ensuring that even compliance team members not responsible for investigations have at least a fundamental understanding of them. As for the investigation itself, they explain, to go well it begins with the first report.  There has to be a clear line of communication and a culture that encourages employees to come forward. Once you receive that initial contact, it’s important to remember that it tells the story only from one side. You need to ask questions to clarify what was seen and heard and start thinking about what other information you will also need to gather.  To keep the information flowing, they recommend telling the reporter and everyone else you interview to reach out to you again if additional information comes to mind. While testimonial evidence is invaluable, don’t stop there.  As you gather the who, what, when and where, be sure to look for the documentary evidence that you need, which requires having strong relationships with departments that have it, such as HR and security. And, throughout the process, stay focused to avoid going down rabbit holes or getting inundated with more information than you need. Listen in to learn more, and be sure to check out Fundamentals of Investigations:  A Practical Guide  and the Fundamentals of Compliance Investigations Workshop.

    12 मिनट
  3. 4 नव॰

    Veronica Xu on Compliance During a Government Raid [Podcast]

    By Adam Turteltaub Uh oh.  The Feds are in the front lobby with a search warrant.  Things are bad, and you don’t want anyone on site to make it worse. The secret is preparation, shares Veronica Xu, SCCE & HCCA Board Member and Chief Compliance Officer, HIPAA Privacy Officer, ADA Administrator at Saber Healthcare Group.  That begins with establishing a cross-functional team that likely includes compliance, the general counsel, CEO, CTO and, depending on your industry, the chief medical officer and others. Each should play a part in shaping the plan and be ready to play their part if a raid occurs. In addition, onsite staff, right down to the receptionist, needs to understand their responsibilities, including whom to call for help.  Not only will that avoid very costly mistakes, it will help reduce errors, fear and stress at what will likely be an extremely difficult time. What an individual gets trained on will vary by role.  Yet, there is one commonality to the training.  Everyone needs to know the importance of staying calm, being polite and respectful. Be sure to also outline the do’s and don’ts. There’s one other thing she strongly advises: remember to communicate with your workforce.  Be as transparent as possible and avoid conflicting messages.  That will keep the lines of communication open and help avoid the speculation that can make the disruption even worse. Listen in to learn more, and then take a fresh look at your current plans for responding to a government raid.

    14 मिनट
  4. 30 अक्टू॰

    Debbie Sabatini Hennelly on Chatbots, Trust and Reporting [Podcast]

    By Adam Turteltaub Employees may trust an AI chatbot more than they trust you, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing, if it leads to more reporting. In this podcast, Debbie Sabatini Hennelly, Founder & President of Resiliti shares that  a recent survey conducted by Case IQ reveals that nearly 70% of respondents expressed no concerns about AI being involved in the helpline process. This openness is driven by several key factors: increased anonymity, ease of use, and a perception that AI offers a fairer, more impartial experience than speaking directly with a human. These findings underscore a broader theme that continues to emerge in conversations about helplines: trust. Employees are more likely to report concerns or misconduct when they trust the system—when they believe their information will be handled confidentially, their identity protected, and their report taken seriously. Not surprisingly, they also want to understand how their information is being used and how their anonymity is being safeguarded. This is especially important when helplines are outsourced to third-party vendors. Communicating clearly that the helpline is external—and therefore more secure and impartial—can go a long way in building trust. But transparency doesn’t stop there. Employees also want to know what happens after they make a report. What’s the process? What can they expect next? Setting clear expectations and following through with updates helps reinforce that the organization is responsive and serious about addressing concerns. It’s not enough to share this information only once a year during compliance training, she warns. Employees are constantly bombarded with messages and unless helpline communication is consistent and visible, it risks being forgotten or ignored. Still, even with those reminders, barriers remain, especially fear of retaliation. Organizations must address this head-on. First, there must be a clear, well-communicated prohibition against retaliation. But more importantly, leaders need to understand that retaliation isn’t always overt. It can be subtle—being passed over for key assignments, being excluded from team activities, or receiving the cold shoulder from colleagues. Creating a culture where employees feel safe to speak up starts with leadership. Managers and executives must model the right behaviors, reinforce anti-retaliation policies, and foster an environment where concerns are welcomed, not punished. One of the most critical—and often overlooked—elements of a successful helpline program is training leaders on how to respond when a report is made. Too often, well-meaning managers try to “get to the bottom of it” themselves. But when they start asking who reported what or conducting their own informal investigations, they can unintentionally obstruct the formal process and make employees feel unsafe. A favorite tactic of hers for addressing this is to ask persistent leaders: “Do you want to be a witness and be deposed?” It’s a powerful reminder that involvement in an investigation has consequences—and that the best way to support the process is to let it unfold professionally and confidentially. Listen in to learn more, and, hopefully, get employees to trust and speak-up more.

    16 मिनट
  5. 28 अक्टू॰

    Evie Wentink on Tone in the Middle [Podcast]

    By Adam Turteltaub If all you’re worrying about is tone at the top, you’re missing a key portion of the choir.  With most people reporting to middle managers, they play in integral role in ensuring a culture of compliance and ethics truly permeates the organization. Evie Wentink, Senior Compliance Consultant at Ethical Edge Experts observes that while many organizations invest in crafting comprehensive codes of conduct and articulate expectations for ethical leadership, they often fall short in equipping managers with the tools, training, and support necessary to fulfill those expectations. This gap can undermine the effectiveness of compliance efforts and leave companies vulnerable to ethical lapses. At the heart of the issue is a lack of intentional communication. Middle managers are frequently expected to embody and promote ethical leadership, yet they are rarely given a clear understanding of what that entails. To bridge this gap, organizations must develop structured plans that define ethical leadership in practical terms. These plans should include specific deliverables, resources, and expectations tailored to the manager’s role. By doing so, companies can ensure that managers are not only aware of their responsibilities but also empowered to carry them out effectively. Authentic, ongoing conversations led by these managers are a cornerstone of a successful compliance culture. These discussions should not be limited to formal training sessions or annual reviews. Instead, they must be woven into the fabric of everyday operations. Managers should be encouraged—and required—to initiate “ethics or integrity minutes” at the start of team meetings. These brief segments provide a consistent opportunity to address ethical topics, reinforce values, and normalize open dialogue about compliance issues. To support these conversations, organizations should provide managers with practical tools. These might include: Ethics spotlight cards that highlight key compliance themes. News articles that can be used to spark discussion around real-world ethical dilemmas. Access to updated policies and codes of conduct, with notifications when changes occur. Tracking and analyzing these conversations is equally important. Compliance teams should maintain records of who is engaging in discussions, what topics are being covered, and which issues are generating the most questions. This data can be invaluable in identifying risk areas, refining training programs, and tailoring future communications. Often, the most common questions arise immediately after a training session, indicating that such moments are prime opportunities for deeper engagement. Moreover, it’s essential to recognize the broader impact of middle management on organizational integrity. Prosecutors and regulators increasingly view middle managers as pivotal figures in corporate misconduct cases. Their actions—or inactions—can significantly influence whether a company succeeds or fails in maintaining ethical standards. Consequently, fostering a culture of accountability and proactive communication at this level is not just beneficial—it’s critical. Ultimately, the goal is to create an environment where ethical conversations are natural, frequent, and valued. When managers consistently lead by example and facilitate open dialogue, employees become more comfortable raising concerns and asking questions. This cultural shift enhances transparency, reduces risk, and strengthens the overall integrity of the organization. In summary, bridging the compliance gap at the middle management level requires a multifaceted approach: clear expectations, practical tools, authentic conversations, and ongoing tracking. By investing in these areas, organizations can transform their compliance programs from static documents into dynamic, living systems that truly support ethical behavior at every level from the top on down.

    10 मिनट

परिचय

An SCCE Podcast

शायद आपको ये भी पसंद आएँ