14 min
Our demands for enterprise content operations software (podcast) The Content Strategy Experts - Scriptorium
-
- Business
In episode 161 of The Content Strategy Experts Podcast, Sarah O’Keefe and Alan Pringle share their ideal world for enterprise content operations software, including specific requests for how content management software needs to evolve.
SO: “When I envision this in the ideal universe, it seems that the most efficient way to solve this from a technical point of view would be to take the DITA standard, extend it out so that it is underlying these various systems, and then build up on top of that. I don’t really care. What I do care about is that I need, and our clients need, the ability to move technical content into learning content in an efficient way. And right now that is harder than it should be.”
AP: “Oh, entirely. And I would even argue it should go the other way, because there is stuff possibly on the training side that the people in the product content side need. So both sides need that ability.”
SO: Right, so give us seamless content sharing, please. Pretty please.”
Related links:
* The business case for content operations (white paper)
* Ask Alan Anything: Resolving pain in content operations (podcast, part 1)
* Developing a strategy for learning content
* Prerequisites for efficient content operations (podcast)
LinkedIn:
* Sarah O’Keefe
* Alan Pringle
Transcript:
Sarah O’Keefe: Welcome to the Content Strategy Experts Podcast brought to you by Scriptorium. Since 1997, Scriptorium has helped companies manage, structure, organize, and distribute content in an efficient way. You may have heard that Madcap has added a learning content management system called Xyleme to their portfolio. In this episode, we are providing an entirely unsolicited roadmap to the vendors in this space, including but not limited to MadCap, for enterprise content ops software as we move forward. Vendors, welcome to the show and think of this as your roadmap to success and call us if you need help. You totally do. Hi there. I’m Sarah O’Keefe and I’m here with Alan Pringle.
Alan Pringle: Hey there, I’m not sure this is the best idea, but we’re about to find out.
SO: Yes, it’s going to be great. We will totally not get in trouble. Alan, let’s dive in and maybe get in trouble as fast as possible. What is the number one item on our list of demands for content ops enterprise software?
AP: Going to vote for seamless content sharing and with a little asterisk here this is not just about us as consultants I think this is as much about our clients and what we have seen over the past few years in the content operation space. We need some kind of way where you can author in a component content management system and then turn around and use that information, for example, in a learning content management system. And there’s, well, exactly, and I was just getting to that. There’s some logistics here. It would be maybe nice to have the same content model underlying all of this, but considering the different authoring audiences, I don’t know if that necessarily has to be the case.
SO: And does that have to be DITA?
In episode 161 of The Content Strategy Experts Podcast, Sarah O’Keefe and Alan Pringle share their ideal world for enterprise content operations software, including specific requests for how content management software needs to evolve.
SO: “When I envision this in the ideal universe, it seems that the most efficient way to solve this from a technical point of view would be to take the DITA standard, extend it out so that it is underlying these various systems, and then build up on top of that. I don’t really care. What I do care about is that I need, and our clients need, the ability to move technical content into learning content in an efficient way. And right now that is harder than it should be.”
AP: “Oh, entirely. And I would even argue it should go the other way, because there is stuff possibly on the training side that the people in the product content side need. So both sides need that ability.”
SO: Right, so give us seamless content sharing, please. Pretty please.”
Related links:
* The business case for content operations (white paper)
* Ask Alan Anything: Resolving pain in content operations (podcast, part 1)
* Developing a strategy for learning content
* Prerequisites for efficient content operations (podcast)
LinkedIn:
* Sarah O’Keefe
* Alan Pringle
Transcript:
Sarah O’Keefe: Welcome to the Content Strategy Experts Podcast brought to you by Scriptorium. Since 1997, Scriptorium has helped companies manage, structure, organize, and distribute content in an efficient way. You may have heard that Madcap has added a learning content management system called Xyleme to their portfolio. In this episode, we are providing an entirely unsolicited roadmap to the vendors in this space, including but not limited to MadCap, for enterprise content ops software as we move forward. Vendors, welcome to the show and think of this as your roadmap to success and call us if you need help. You totally do. Hi there. I’m Sarah O’Keefe and I’m here with Alan Pringle.
Alan Pringle: Hey there, I’m not sure this is the best idea, but we’re about to find out.
SO: Yes, it’s going to be great. We will totally not get in trouble. Alan, let’s dive in and maybe get in trouble as fast as possible. What is the number one item on our list of demands for content ops enterprise software?
AP: Going to vote for seamless content sharing and with a little asterisk here this is not just about us as consultants I think this is as much about our clients and what we have seen over the past few years in the content operation space. We need some kind of way where you can author in a component content management system and then turn around and use that information, for example, in a learning content management system. And there’s, well, exactly, and I was just getting to that. There’s some logistics here. It would be maybe nice to have the same content model underlying all of this, but considering the different authoring audiences, I don’t know if that necessarily has to be the case.
SO: And does that have to be DITA?
14 min