67 episodi

‘Fresh AiR’ is a podcast, hosted by Joe, Martijn and Dave. It is part of Answers in Reason but hopes to bring a fresh perspective on a number of topics.

Philosophy, Science, and the intersection with social and secular issues is our main focus; we aim to ascend the tribe and do more than simply claim to be sceptics by actually taking the time to understand what scepticism is.

Season 1 first launched in 2019 and other authors became a part of the crew. Over time we grew and also undertook our live stream, the "SciPhi" show on YouTube

Fresh AiR Answers in Reason - Joe Johnstone, Dave Rowlands, Martijn, Kristyn Pike & Guests

    • Cultura e società

‘Fresh AiR’ is a podcast, hosted by Joe, Martijn and Dave. It is part of Answers in Reason but hopes to bring a fresh perspective on a number of topics.

Philosophy, Science, and the intersection with social and secular issues is our main focus; we aim to ascend the tribe and do more than simply claim to be sceptics by actually taking the time to understand what scepticism is.

Season 1 first launched in 2019 and other authors became a part of the crew. Over time we grew and also undertook our live stream, the "SciPhi" show on YouTube

    Discussions and The Burden of Proof – Podcast Version

    Discussions and The Burden of Proof – Podcast Version

    Discussions and The Burden of Proof Posted on6th November 2022  ByDavidian

    One of the problems with contemporary social media discourse is jumping around and ahead in the conversation, misusing terms, axioms, and similar and not taking the time to actually have a discussion and understand what the other person is saying.

    We are too quick to judge people based on the group we think they belong to and forget to appreciate the nuance between positions. A Christian is judged by how we judge all Christians based on previous experiences with Christians. The same can be said for atheists, Muslims or any other group.

    This form of tribalism and cognitive bias makes use too quick to assume positions, all entailed beliefs and rationality, and you find people just name fallacies (often incorrectly) instead of having a dialogue and reaching some accord.

    Recap: We often fail to hold conversations and throw out erroneous statements based on poor assumptions.

    There is a difference between a belief and a claim.

    A belief is something you accept as true. (Think most likely, conclude is the case etc)A claim is something to say IS true.

    So, sure, there is a claim that you believe something, but as we don’t have access to anyone’s mental states this isn’t anything we can prove, and really, why would someone say they believe something that they don’t? (Except for outlier cases and cons which again don’t really apply to social media conversations.)

    When you do or don’t believe something, the only real duty you have is to yourself, and even then this duty only applies if you care about rationality.

    Recap: Your primary duty to any belief position is to yourself.

    Rationality deals with the way we reason, using the rules of logic and probability theory. This entails having no strong evidence against your position, no contradiction in your beliefs, not using fallacious reasoning but also realising that bit everything is a fallacy e.g. there are some authorities you can trust without it being a fallay, and this ties into good theories of testimony and all sorts.

    So, if we care about rationality, our burden is to justify our position, at least to ourselves, so that we can ensure that we are holding a rational position.

    Recap: rationality deals with the way you reason, everyone has a burden to justify their position to themselves if they care about rationality.

    You can be wrong (without knowing it) and still be rational, and you can be correct and irrational.

    However, rationality is definitely something that would usually lead one to truth if all all information was available to you and analysed mitigating all bias – which is hard to do, as bias is built into our wiring.

    So, one’s rationality is somewhat relative to the information available. Someone in an epistemic bubble could be rational for believing something that outside of that bubble would be wildly irrational.

    It can be said one can only be as rational as one can be. We should judge a child as a child, they do not have fully developed brains nor learned adequate reasoning skills, and therefore their behaviour is by default less rational on an adult scale.



    This too relates to the information available. Forming an option based on 3 bits of information that point to a single conclusion and not being able to find anything else would be rational, even if that conclusion was wrong.

    If you later found additional information that then leads elsewhere and the original conclusion was wrong, it would be irrational to maintain that original conclusion as true.

    Recap: rationality should be judged in a more relative way, and based on reasoning, not conclusions.

    Full Article at:
    Discussions and The Burden of Proof » Answers In Reason (answers-in-reason.com)






    ---

    Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/freshair/message

    • 15 min
    “Religious People are Dumb” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!

    “Religious People are Dumb” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!

    Are Religious People More Stupid Than Atheists? We atheists have a number of things in our toolbelts, and one of those is memes. Many of these memes are oversimplifications or just flat out wrong, so I thought I would create a series to address some of our worst memes and explain why they are so bad....
    Read More ““Religious People are Dumb” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!” »
    The post “Religious People are Dumb” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM! appeared first on Answers In Reason.

    ---

    Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/freshair/message

    • 7 min
    “Santa vs God” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!

    “Santa vs God” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!

    Who’d win the Fight, Santa or God? One of the worst comparisons I see us atheists make is comparing God to Santa (or any other mythological character). I understand the reason comparisons like this start. Many of us atheists regard both Santa and god as myths, which is fine, but what is not fine is that is where...
    Read More ““Santa vs God” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!” »
    The post “Santa vs God” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM! appeared first on Answers In Reason.

    ---

    Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/freshair/message

    • 7 min
    The Null Hypothesis: How it Relates to Atheism and God – SciPhi Shortz

    The Null Hypothesis: How it Relates to Atheism and God – SciPhi Shortz

    Is Atheism the Null Hypothesis? It is common to hear folks claim Atheism is the null hypothesis. In this SciPhi Short we will be going over what the null hypothesis is with a few examples. We will start by covering off what a hypothesis is, moving on to the null hypothesis itself, and finishing up...
    Read More “The Null Hypothesis: How it Relates to Atheism and God – SciPhi Shortz” »
    The post The Null Hypothesis: How it Relates to Atheism and God – SciPhi Shortz appeared first on Answers In Reason.

    ---

    Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/freshair/message

    • 4 min
    “We Are All Born Atheist!” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!

    “We Are All Born Atheist!” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!

    Are we Really Born Atheists? We atheists have a number of things in our toolbelts, and one of those is memes.  Many of these memes are oversimplifications or just flat out wrong, so I thought I would create a series to address some of our worst memes and explain why they are so bad. Something that...
    Read More ““We Are All Born Atheist!” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!” »
    The post “We Are All Born Atheist!” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM! appeared first on Answers In Reason.

    ---

    Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/freshair/message

    • 6 min
    Rationality: How Can a Belief Be Rational? – SciPhi Shortz

    Rationality: How Can a Belief Be Rational? – SciPhi Shortz

    What does it mean to be rational? It is common to hear that all beliefs are irrational, but is that really the case? In this SciPhi Short we will be briefly examining rationality and how it relates to belief. We will be covering: – What is a Belief – What is Rationality – States of...
    Read More “Rationality: How Can a Belief Be Rational? – SciPhi Shortz” »
    The post Rationality: How Can a Belief Be Rational? – SciPhi Shortz appeared first on Answers In Reason.

    ---

    Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/freshair/message

    • 6 min

Top podcast nella categoria Cultura e società

BESTIE
OnePodcast
ONE MORE TIME  di Luca Casadei
OnePodcast
Chiedilo a Barbero - Intesa Sanpaolo On Air
Intesa Sanpaolo e Chora Media
Passa dal BSMT
Gianluca Gazzoli
Tintoria
OnePodcast
Non lo faccio x moda
Giulia Salemi

Potrebbero piacerti anche…

Fresh Air
NPR
This American Life
This American Life
Hidden Brain
Hidden Brain, Shankar Vedantam
The Daily
The New York Times
Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me!
NPR
THE DEFIANT PODCAST WITH BROOKLYN DAD DEFIANT
Audio Up Media