18 episodes

Tune in to hear art law case briefs in an audio format! Law student case briefs are typically intended as a study tool, and this intended to let you learn while listening.

Art Law Case Briefs Podcast Kimberly Babin

    • Arts

Tune in to hear art law case briefs in an audio format! Law student case briefs are typically intended as a study tool, and this intended to let you learn while listening.

    United States v. McClain, (1977)

    United States v. McClain, (1977)

    The defendants in this case had covertly aided in locating buyers for the cultural property, knowing they were likely violating Mexico’s patrimony laws.

    • 2 min
    Georgia O’Keeffe Foundation (Museum) v. Fisk University (2009)

    Georgia O’Keeffe Foundation (Museum) v. Fisk University (2009)

    Alfred Stieglitz, a innovative photographer, collector of modern art, and husband of Georgia O'Keeffe, perished leaving behind an estate included approximately 900 works of art and a will and testament that stated Georgia O'Keeffe, and this appeal examined respective rights of three parties concerning charitable gifts of 101 pieces of art given, subject to conditions, to Fisk University in the late 1940s and early 1950s

    • 5 min
    National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley (1998)

    National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley (1998)

    1990’s funding decisions of the NEA were under fire when the art viewing public found the funding and works scandalous, and congress responded with amendment section 954 of the National Foundation on Arts and Humanities Act

    • 2 min
    Cincinnati v. Contemporary Arts Center (1990)

    Cincinnati v. Contemporary Arts Center (1990)

    Robert Mapplethorpe Exhibition “Perfect Moment” featured 5 graphic photos amongst 169 non-obscene works in Cincinnati v. Contemporary Arts Center, addressing the "as a whole" phrase in the Miller Test.

    • 3 min
    Miller v. California (1973)

    Miller v. California (1973)

    Here the 3-pronged Miller Test is established in response to an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court involving Marvin Miller's unsolicited, sexually explicit, obscene, mailing advertisements for sexy books.

    • 3 min
    Roth v. United States(1957)

    Roth v. United States(1957)

    Both a California and a New York bookseller had been charged with Obscenity for distributing books and magazines featuring nude photos and erotic stories, with their appeals heard before the United States Supreme Court.

    • 3 min

Top Podcasts In Arts

«Закладка» с Екатериной Шульман и Галиной Юзефович
Эхо Подкасты
Мрачные сказки
Терменвокс
КАМ ТУГЕЗЕР
Камилла Лысенко
Magic Lessons with Elizabeth Gilbert
Elizabeth Gilbert and Maximum Fun
99% Invisible
Roman Mars
Pragmema Project
Pragmema