The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up‪)‬ Niall Boylan

In this episode, Niall asks, "Is It Okay to Discipline Someone Else's Child?" The discussion stems from a listener's dilemma about whether it was appropriate to intervene and discipline another child who was bullying their own child at school.
Niall opens up the lines to callers, sparking a lively debate.
Some callers strongly believe it's acceptable to step in when another child is misbehaving, especially in cases of bullying. They argue that as a community, there is a shared responsibility to ensure all children are treated with respect and kindness. These callers feel that a firm word or intervention can be crucial in preventing further bullying and teaching kids about acceptable behavior. They highlight that addressing bad behavior promptly can set a clear boundary and protect other children from harm.
On the other hand, other callers feel that it's inappropriate to directly discipline someone else's child. They argue that such actions can overstep personal boundaries and potentially escalate the situation. Instead, they suggest that the proper approach would be to speak to the child's parents or school authorities, allowing them to handle the discipline in a more structured and respectful manner. These callers emphasize the importance of maintaining a respectful approach and avoiding actions that could intimidate or confuse the child.
Niall wraps up the episode by summarizing the diverse viewpoints, reflecting on the need to balance protecting one's own child with respecting the boundaries of disciplining others. He highlights the importance of community involvement and the necessity of addressing bullying, while also advocating for appropriate and respectful ways to resolve conflicts involving children.

In this episode, Niall asks, "Do You Support The Aer Lingus Strike?" The discussion revolves around the ongoing industrial action by Aer Lingus pilots demanding a 24% pay increase to offset inflation since their last raise in 2019. The strike has already begun affecting flights, with more disruptions expected soon. The Irish Airline Pilots' Association (IALPA) argues that the pay raise is justified given Aer Lingus' 400% profit increase last year, while Aer Lingus management contends that such demands are unsustainable without productivity improvements.
Some callers fully support the Aer Lingus pilots in their strike. They believe the pilots made significant sacrifices during the pandemic, and now that Aer Lingus is profitable again, it's only fair that the pilots receive a pay raise reflecting their hard work and dedication. The planned work-to-rule policy and full-day strike are seen as necessary measures to pressure Aer Lingus management to negotiate in good faith.
While other callers do not support the strike. They argue that while the pilots' desire for better pay is understandable, the timing and manner of the strike are causing major disruptions for travelers during the peak summer season. This not only inconveniences passengers but also damages the airline's reputation. They believe there are other ways to negotiate without causing such widespread disruption and stress that negotiations should continue without impacting thousands of travelers.
Niall summarizes the arguments on both sides, reflecting on the balance between fair compensation and the broader impact on travelers and the airline's stability. He emphasizes the importance of finding a resolution that acknowledges the pilots' contributions while minimizing disruption to passengers and the airline's operations.

In this episode, Niall is asking, "Do You Have An Objection To People Bringing Dogs Into Bars?" The topic arises from an email from a listener who was denied entry to a beer garden with their dog. The listener shared their experience and expressed frustration about not being able to enjoy time with their pet in a social setting. This has sparked a debate about whether dogs should be allowed in bars, beer gardens, or restaurants.
Some callers think people should absolutely be allowed to bring their dogs into bars, especially beer gardens. They argue that dogs are part of the family, and many people enjoy spending time with their pets in social settings. It can make the atmosphere more relaxed and enjoyable. As long as the dogs are well-behaved and hygiene standards are maintained, there shouldn't be a problem. They also mention that it is common in other countries and adds charm to the place, providing opportunities for socialization among dog owners.
While other callers strongly object to dogs being allowed in bars and beer gardens. They point out that not everyone is comfortable around dogs, and some people have allergies or phobias. There are concerns about hygiene, especially if dogs are not well-behaved. People go to bars to relax and enjoy themselves, and having dogs around can lead to disturbances. They believe bars should remain a pet-free zone to ensure everyone's comfort and safety.
Niall wraps up the discussion by summarizing the arguments for and against allowing dogs in bars, highlighting the importance of balancing the enjoyment of pet owners with the comfort and safety of all patrons.

In this episode, Niall is asking, "Should Ireland Introduce The Two Child Benefit Cap?" This policy, which restricts welfare benefits to the first two children, has been a contentious issue in the UK since its introduction in 2017. Supporters argue it encourages responsible family planning and alleviates taxpayer burden, while opponents believe it pushes more children into poverty and undermines the welfare system.
Some callers think Ireland should introduce the two-child benefit cap. They argue that while the state has a duty to support families, couples need to budget responsibly, especially if unemployed. A cap would ensure targeted and sustainable support, alleviating financial pressure on taxpayers and promoting personal responsibility in family planning.
Other callers strongly oppose the cap, believing it would disproportionately affect low-income families and push more children into poverty. They emphasize that the state should ensure all children’s basic needs are met and highlight Ireland's declining population. Encouraging larger families through financial support is seen as essential for the country's future stability and growth.
Niall concludes the discussion by weighing the potential benefits of personal responsibility and financial sustainability against the need to support larger families and address demographic challenges, leaving listeners to ponder whether a two-child benefit cap is the right path for Ireland.

In this episode, Niall is asking, "Do You Believe In A God Or A Higher Power?" We dive into one of the most profound and deeply personal questions of all: "Do You Believe In A God Or A Higher Power?"
In a world filled with diverse beliefs, spiritual practices, and philosophical viewpoints, the concept of a higher power has intrigued humanity for centuries. Whether through organized religion, personal spirituality, or philosophical inquiry, the idea of something greater than ourselves resonates differently for each of us.
Some callers believe in a higher power, finding it provides purpose, moral guidance, and a sense of connection. They see the complexity of the universe as evidence of intelligent design and find comfort in their faith. They also emphasize the community and shared values that belief in a higher power fosters.
Other callers don't believe in a higher power, relying instead on science and empirical evidence to explain the universe. They argue that morality and purpose can be derived from human experiences and our innate sense of empathy and justice. They see belief in a higher power as a construct to explain the unknown and provide comfort, which becomes less necessary as scientific understanding advances.
Join us as we explore this deeply personal and complex topic, considering perspectives from both believers and skeptics. Is there something greater than ourselves, or do we create our own meaning and purpose in life?

In this episode, Niall is asking, "EU Migration Pact: Is Sovereignty An Outdated Concept?"
The Government is set to opt into the EU Migration Pact, aiming to streamline asylum processes across member states with legally binding processing times and efficient returns of unsuccessful applicants. This will involve processing applications within three to six months, fingerprinting and photographing applicants, and establishing designated accommodation centers. The pact also includes a mandatory "border procedure" for specific cohorts, requiring significant increases in staff and resources.
Some argue that Ireland could implement these measures under its own laws, while others believe the pact will enforce necessary improvements. Niall explores whether sovereignty is an outdated concept in today's interconnected world, considering the immense benefits Ireland has gained from EU membership, such as economic growth, job opportunities, and a stronger global presence.
Some callers think our sovereignty is an outdated concept in the modern world. Being part of the EU has brought immense benefits to Ireland. We've seen significant economic growth, improved job opportunities, and better standards of living. The EU’s single market and support have stabilized our economy, making it more competitive globally. Moreover, being part of a larger entity like the EU offers us protection and a stronger voice on the international stage. In today's interconnected world, pooling sovereignty for mutual benefits is the way forward.
While other callers feel maintaining our sovereignty is crucial. While the EU has provided economic benefits, it also means we have to comply with decisions that might not always align with our national interests. For instance, the new migration pact imposes rules that we could address through our own laws. Being forced to follow EU mandates can sometimes undermine our ability to govern independently and address our unique challenges effectively. Sovereignty ensures that we retain control over our policies and national identity.