The State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen (Part 2) - Cracks in the State's Theory Closing Arguments

If you thought this case was interesting, you haven't heard anything yet!
Welcome back to our multi-part episodic series, where we explore The State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen. This murder case has gained international attention and it continues to get crazier as time goes on.
In Part 2, we explore the pieces of evidence that begin creating cracks in the State's theory on how Richard Allen followed through with murder.
Enjoy!
Timecodes:
0:06 - Introduction and overview on the case
1:06 - Researching the case for the podcast has been exhausting
3:35 - What is a Franks Motion?
6:50 - The Defense attorneys argued that the Sheriff lied to the judge in application for warrant
7:50 - The State's public theory of the case
12:26 - The search warrant application containing false information
15:25 - Time to buckle up your seatbelt!
21:20 - The nature of the crime scene wasn't initially revealed
30:43 - There was no DNA left at the crime scene
34:57 - How Odinism comes into play with this case
39:18 - The red flags that begin popping up in the State's theory
49:14 - Who ultimately will be Richard Allen's attorney at the end of the day?
53:36 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:
Website
Facebook
YouTube
LinkedIn