58 min

Hung Like a Jury 👁‍�‪�‬ Oculi Auribus

    • Comentarios de noticias

Hung Like a Jury

Congress’’s inaction is action both sides dangle “laws” but refuse to:

Talk about them

Debate them

Show us them

Take in to consideration 2nd and 3rd order effects

Look at long term implications

Look at the constitutionality of the law

The Supreme Court does not:

Write laws

Edit laws

Amend the constitution

Represent the people

AND…. In many cases add personal emotional opinion and not look at the legal Fram of the Constitution of the United States of America

So why is there such a magnifying glass on the SCOTUS on the “ruling” well possible “ruling” to overturn Roe V. Wade?

The lawmakers have failed for over 60 years to solidify or codify the opinion known as Roe v. Wade but some how its a select few people who sit on the highest court who have “ruined” this . I’m here to tell you this is as far from the truth as possible.

Tune in NOW as we look at the hung jury and how it wants to, needs to point the finger AND completely ignore who’s responsibility “LAW” making actual falls under…

“Perspective is a hell of a drug.”

-Mike Ellis

Apple 🍎

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/oculi-auribus/id1570741372

Spotify 🎶

https://open.spotify.com/show/0A0Rn2S3z2lbdVWP67kYyh

Instagram 📷

https://www.instagram.com/oculi_auribus/

Google 🌎

https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy81YjljYmViYy9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw==

Sticher 🧩

https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/oculi-auribus

Podchaser 🎙

https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/oculi-auribus-1965202

🎥 Video made in

https://vizzy.io


---

Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/ellis-mike/support

Hung Like a Jury

Congress’’s inaction is action both sides dangle “laws” but refuse to:

Talk about them

Debate them

Show us them

Take in to consideration 2nd and 3rd order effects

Look at long term implications

Look at the constitutionality of the law

The Supreme Court does not:

Write laws

Edit laws

Amend the constitution

Represent the people

AND…. In many cases add personal emotional opinion and not look at the legal Fram of the Constitution of the United States of America

So why is there such a magnifying glass on the SCOTUS on the “ruling” well possible “ruling” to overturn Roe V. Wade?

The lawmakers have failed for over 60 years to solidify or codify the opinion known as Roe v. Wade but some how its a select few people who sit on the highest court who have “ruined” this . I’m here to tell you this is as far from the truth as possible.

Tune in NOW as we look at the hung jury and how it wants to, needs to point the finger AND completely ignore who’s responsibility “LAW” making actual falls under…

“Perspective is a hell of a drug.”

-Mike Ellis

Apple 🍎

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/oculi-auribus/id1570741372

Spotify 🎶

https://open.spotify.com/show/0A0Rn2S3z2lbdVWP67kYyh

Instagram 📷

https://www.instagram.com/oculi_auribus/

Google 🌎

https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy81YjljYmViYy9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw==

Sticher 🧩

https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/oculi-auribus

Podchaser 🎙

https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/oculi-auribus-1965202

🎥 Video made in

https://vizzy.io


---

Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/ellis-mike/support

58 min