Prosecuting Donald Trump MSNBC
-
- News
-
Veteran prosecutors Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord discuss and dissect the cases against former President Donald Trump, including the historic indictments from the Manhattan D.A., Special Counsel Jack Smith and Fulton County D.A. Fani Willis.
-
It’s Only Tuesday
Dissecting the cross-examination of AMI CEO David P****r. Plus: Judge Merchan’s options as he hears more alleged gag order violations this Thursday.
-
The Presidency Before the Supreme Court
Scrutinizing the Supreme Court’s historic oral arguments on Trump’s claim of presidential immunity and David P****r’s testimony in New York.
-
Live Coverage: Supreme Court Hears Trump’s Immunity Claim
Listen to Supreme Court arguments on whether Donald Trump is immune from criminal prosecution.
-
Opening Statements
An analysis of opening statements in the New York criminal trial and a preview of the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Trump’s immunity appeal.
-
The Jury Is Seated, with Readings from Robert De Niro and Glenn Close
The jury is seated. Plus an in-depth review of the Statement of Facts with excerpts read by Robert De Niro and Glenn Close.
-
In a Manhattan Courtroom
The first criminal trial of a former U.S. president gets underway in a Manhattan courtroom. And acclaimed actor Robert De Niro reads an excerpt from the New York indictment.
Customer Reviews
A good team
Weissmann can be gushing and over-enthusiastic. McCord is more sober. Together they make an impressive team. They explain the cases’ intricacies well. Since both were senior federal prosecutors, they naturally emphasise the federal cases. This is a bit regrettable since, for now at least, the most interesting things seem to be happening in the Georgia state case. For analysis of the GA case I turn to The Last Word With Lawrence O’Donnell (which frequently features Weissmann as a guest). LOD is openly anti-Trump — the program makes no attempt to be balanced — but the insights, substantive and especially procedural, offered by the GA lawyers LOD regularly interviews are very helpful in understanding the case. One thing that is unexpectedly happening: the GA judge is emerging as something of a superstar, mature and and careful, but decisive and firm. Bravo — quite a contrast to the judge in the federal documents case.