![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
82 episodes
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Term Talk FJC
-
- Business
The nation's top legal scholars discuss what Federal Judges need to know about the U.S. Supreme Court's most impactful decisions.
-
- video
Term Talk: Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters
Preemption. NLRA. Experts discuss the aggravated imminent and foreseeable harm needed to remove unions from protection under the National Labor Relations Act and to allow actions in state courts to proceed.
-
Term Talk: Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters
Preemption. NLRA. Experts discuss the aggravated imminent and foreseeable harm needed to remove unions from protection under the National Labor Relations Act and to allow actions in state courts to proceed.
-
- video
Term Talk: National Pork Producers Council v. Ross
Dormant Commerce Clause. Experts discuss the reaffirmation of the Pike balancing test and express different interpretations of the Supreme Court’s treatment of extra-territoriality principles.
-
Term Talk: National Pork Producers Council v. Ross
Dormant Commerce Clause. Experts discuss the reaffirmation of the Pike balancing test and express different interpretations of the Supreme Court’s treatment of extra-territoriality principles.
-
Term Talk: Smith v. United States, Samia v. United States, In Re Grand Jury
Experts discuss the Supreme Court’s opinion in Smith v. United States which held that double jeopardy does not attach to trials conducted in the wrong venue.
In Samia v. United States, they analyze whether the use of a non-testifying co-defendant’s confession that implicates the other defendant violates the codefendant’s right to confront witnesses.
Finally, In Re Grand Jury, they discuss what the Court’s dismissal of the case after argument might mean to efforts to expand the scope of the attorney-client privilege. -
- video
Term Talk: Smith v. United States, Samia v. United States, In Re Grand Jury
Experts discuss the Supreme Court’s opinion in Smith v. United States which held that double jeopardy does not attach to trials conducted in the wrong venue.
In Samia v. United States, they analyze whether the use of a non-testifying co-defendant’s confession that implicates the other defendant violates the codefendant’s right to confront witnesses.
Finally, In Re Grand Jury, they discuss what the Court’s dismissal of the case after argument might mean to efforts to expand the scope of the attorney-client privilege.