82 episodes

The nation's top legal scholars discuss what Federal Judges need to know about the U.S. Supreme Court's most impactful decisions.

Term Talk FJC

    • Business

The nation's top legal scholars discuss what Federal Judges need to know about the U.S. Supreme Court's most impactful decisions.

    • video
    Term Talk: Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters

    Term Talk: Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters

    Preemption. NLRA. Experts discuss the aggravated imminent and foreseeable harm needed to remove unions from protection under the National Labor Relations Act and to allow actions in state courts to proceed.

    • 9 min
    Term Talk: Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters

    Term Talk: Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters

    Preemption. NLRA. Experts discuss the aggravated imminent and foreseeable harm needed to remove unions from protection under the National Labor Relations Act and to allow actions in state courts to proceed.

    • 10 min
    • video
    Term Talk: National Pork Producers Council v. Ross

    Term Talk: National Pork Producers Council v. Ross

    Dormant Commerce Clause. Experts discuss the reaffirmation of the Pike balancing test and express different interpretations of the Supreme Court’s treatment of extra-territoriality principles.

    • 10 min
    Term Talk: National Pork Producers Council v. Ross

    Term Talk: National Pork Producers Council v. Ross

    Dormant Commerce Clause. Experts discuss the reaffirmation of the Pike balancing test and express different interpretations of the Supreme Court’s treatment of extra-territoriality principles.

    • 10 min
    Term Talk: Smith v. United States, Samia v. United States, In Re Grand Jury

    Term Talk: Smith v. United States, Samia v. United States, In Re Grand Jury

    Experts discuss the Supreme Court’s opinion in Smith v. United States which held that double jeopardy does not attach to trials conducted in the wrong venue.

    In Samia v. United States, they analyze whether the use of a non-testifying co-defendant’s confession that implicates the other defendant violates the codefendant’s right to confront witnesses.

    Finally, In Re Grand Jury, they discuss what the Court’s dismissal of the case after argument might mean to efforts to expand the scope of the attorney-client privilege.

    • 15 min
    • video
    Term Talk: Smith v. United States, Samia v. United States, In Re Grand Jury

    Term Talk: Smith v. United States, Samia v. United States, In Re Grand Jury

    Experts discuss the Supreme Court’s opinion in Smith v. United States which held that double jeopardy does not attach to trials conducted in the wrong venue.

    In Samia v. United States, they analyze whether the use of a non-testifying co-defendant’s confession that implicates the other defendant violates the codefendant’s right to confront witnesses.

    Finally, In Re Grand Jury, they discuss what the Court’s dismissal of the case after argument might mean to efforts to expand the scope of the attorney-client privilege.

    • 15 min

Top Podcasts In Business

The Diary Of A CEO with Steven Bartlett
DOAC
The Game w/ Alex Hormozi
Alex Hormozi
Macro Voices
Hedge Fund Manager Erik Townsend
The Knowledge Project with Shane Parrish
Farnam Street
VT Podcast “Ideas That Matter”
Africa Podcast Network
声动早咖啡
声动活泼