28 avsnitt

In this course, Dr. Nash explores the relationship between Modern and Post-Modern philosophy. This is done through an examination of the thought of key philosophers, such as Immanuel Kant, G.W.F. Hegel, Soren Kierkegaard, Karl Marx, and Friedrich Nietzsche, and an exploration of the major movements in this period, including Naturalism, Romanticism, Nihilism, Existentialism, and Process Theology. In addition, Dr. Nash offers a critical analysis of the early 20th century liberal Protestant movement and the Evangelical response, particularly that of J. Gresham Machen.

Modern Philosophy Reformed Theological Seminary

    • Religion och spiritualitet
    • 2,2 • 5 betyg

In this course, Dr. Nash explores the relationship between Modern and Post-Modern philosophy. This is done through an examination of the thought of key philosophers, such as Immanuel Kant, G.W.F. Hegel, Soren Kierkegaard, Karl Marx, and Friedrich Nietzsche, and an exploration of the major movements in this period, including Naturalism, Romanticism, Nihilism, Existentialism, and Process Theology. In addition, Dr. Nash offers a critical analysis of the early 20th century liberal Protestant movement and the Evangelical response, particularly that of J. Gresham Machen.

    Introduction to Modernism

    Introduction to Modernism

    • 2 sek.
    Postmodernity and Deconstructionism

    Postmodernity and Deconstructionism

    • 2 sek.
    Jean Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant

    Jean Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant

    • 2 sek.
    Immanuel Kant and the 12 Categories

    Immanuel Kant and the 12 Categories

    • 2 sek.
    A Critique of Immanuel Kant

    A Critique of Immanuel Kant

    • 2 sek.
    G.W.F. Hegel

    G.W.F. Hegel

    • 1 sek.

Kundrecensioner

2,2 av 5
5 betyg

5 betyg

Laura duty hey FG ,

Too biased

Its quite entertaining (for all the wrong reasons) Way too biased. Its nothing like real academia. Ongoing sarcasm for no apparent reasons.

Puzzlingdude ,

Horrible

To hear commentaries such as "this is a bunch of baloney" at a university level while commenting ANY philosopher is not only inappropriate, is idiotic and devoid of any value. I understand that these people are absolutely sure they hold the truth and that all others are heretics, but when commenting and analyzing the thoughts of other human beings, one would expect at least a certain amount of depth. Otherwise, why bother publishing it? To think that they are PAYING someone to vomit superficial and banal commentaries on important thinkers. By the way, I do not like Sartre myself and I find existentialism methodologically weak, far too based on the self... this is the beginning of an analysis. What is recorded on these casts is just some dude's opinion puked on a silent audience and intercalated with sarcasm. Horrible.

Mest populära podcaster inom Religion och spiritualitet

Du kanske också gillar

Mer av Reformed Theological Seminary