Your Law Podcast Your Law Podcast

In this Season 1 finale the question of "Can a search be allowed without consent?" is answered, while also keeping the 4th amendment in mind. 

Ladies and Gentlemen, this week our favorite lawyer returns to discuss the Exclusionary Rule and Truth in Evidence. These upcoming series of episodes were inspired by a question sent in to yourlawpod@gmail.com pertaining to evidence found in a warrantless search. Cases mentioned on this weeks episode listed below.

Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383

Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949)

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)

Ladies and Gentlemen, this week we discuss the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act and and how YOU can be protected! Andre also discusses his experience in cases where provisions in this Act were violated.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&division=3.&title=1.5.&part=4.&chapter=3.&article=

Ladies and Gentlemen, this week's episode was inspired from a question sent in to yourlawpod@gmail.com. The question is in regards to providing a bilingual lease agreement, but we discuss more than just that this week. Listed below were sections discussed on this week's show.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1941.&lawCode=CIV

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1942.&lawCode=CIV

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1953

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1954

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1717

The most anticipated topic requested so far, Online Defamation. The previous three episodes (Defamation, Sec. 230, Anti-SLAPP) have led up this edition and provide some helpful information. Of course you can enjoy without listening to those episodes, but you wouldn't watch Back to the Future Part 3 without watching the first two, so, proceed as you wish.


https://casetext.com/case/vogel-v-felice 

Ladies and Gentlemen this week we return to discuss the Anti-SLAPP statute in California. Necessary information in this statute will key into understanding our next episode featuring Online Defamation. Included are links to articles and cases referenced on this episode. And you can still send your questions into yourlawpod@gmail.com

https://medialaw.org/component/k2/item/4916-rachel-maddow-wins-dismissal-of-oan-defamation-suit-under-anti-slapp-statute

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/oan-to-pay-msnbc-250-000-in-fees-after-losing-maddow-libel-suit

https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/3d/23/899.html (Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Ctr.)

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914b439add7b0493476b135 (Kronemyer v. Internet Movie Database (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 941.)

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1544271.html (Wong v. Jing, 189 Cal. App. 4th 1354)

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1857269.html (Shantel Jackson v. Floyd Mayweather Jr.)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/418/323 (Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.)

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1053102.html (AMPEX CORPORATION v. CARGLE)