Talking Talmud Yardaena Osband & Anne Gordon

The daf contains two mishnahs which contain halakhot about securities and when one may not take a security

Rabah bar Avuha meets Eliyahu and asks three questions. The daf returns to its discussion of collateral and almost seems to undermine the concept.

When and how can a lender collect a security? The daf also contains a very strange baraita about what a lender must leave a borrower.

If one uses a shopkeeper or a money changer to hold on to a worker's wages - can he be paid this way, or can he go back to the employer to be paid directly? Of course, it's a machloket. Also, swearing that you weren't paid to be able to collect your wages - in contrast to the usual denial of claim. Which works to the protection of the employee.

If wages are withheld is it oshek or gezel? Does the prohibition against withholding wages also apply to animals and keilim?

The daf looks at the case of an ambiguous document and how do is payment determined. A new mishnah begins a discussion on the timely payment of employees