58 集

Attorney, host and creator Paul Townsend examines some of the most famous and infamous - and often misunderstood - court cases to make headlines across America. In doing so, he provides listeners with a true and unbiased understanding of the underlying facts as the judge or jury would have heard them at the time, explains what the role of each party was, breaks down the legal arguments presented, and gives the final word on who ultimately prevailed and why.

In Summation - The Final Word Paul Townsend

    • 社會與文化

Attorney, host and creator Paul Townsend examines some of the most famous and infamous - and often misunderstood - court cases to make headlines across America. In doing so, he provides listeners with a true and unbiased understanding of the underlying facts as the judge or jury would have heard them at the time, explains what the role of each party was, breaks down the legal arguments presented, and gives the final word on who ultimately prevailed and why.

    Idaho v. Brian Draper and Torey Adamcik

    Idaho v. Brian Draper and Torey Adamcik

    Welcome Back Listeners!In this episode of In Summation, Paul discusses a horror movie turned real life. Inspired by the 1996 horror classic, Scream, Brian Draper and Torey Adamcik donned ghostface masks, black robes, and hunting knives to murder their high school classmate and friend, Cassie Jo Stoddart. Not only did they stab her 30 times while she was alone, house sitting for relatives, but they filmed themselves talking about the act before, and after, the crime.We look how two...

    • 53 分鐘
    United States v. Lori Loughlin, et al. (Varsity Blues Scandal)

    United States v. Lori Loughlin, et al. (Varsity Blues Scandal)

    Remember Full House? Remember how wholesome and family-friendly it was? Remember Aunt Becky? She was married to Uncle Jesse. She was part of that wave of television which instilled good family values and strong moral character while still being funny and entertaining...life before the OC.But despite Lori Loughlin's fairly robust acting career, she found herself on the wrong side of the law. In this episode, Paul breaks down the largest college admissions scandal ...

    • 51 分鐘
    California v. Calvin Broadus (Snoop Doggy Dogg)

    California v. Calvin Broadus (Snoop Doggy Dogg)

    The 1990's were filled with high profile criminal trials for some of the most famous entertainers in the world. Michael Jackson and OJ Simpson headlined a list of extremely public trials, mostly centered in California.One case which seems to be getting lost amidst this glut of criminal prosecutions is the murder charge brought against a young up-and-coming gangster rap artist named Calvin Broadus, who adopted the stage name Snoop Doggy Dogg.A few months prior to the release of his first...

    • 52 分鐘
    Illinois v. August Spies, Albert Parsons, et al. (The Haymarket 8)

    Illinois v. August Spies, Albert Parsons, et al. (The Haymarket 8)

    Hello again friends and family,Bucking a recent trend of recent cases, today we head back roughly 140 years to Chicago in the 1880s. This is another case where a person or group's personal ideology was put on trial instead of the men and their individual actions themselves. It's a cautionary tale on what our justice system could become if we aren't vigilant in preventing it. Chicago during the industrial revolution was a tense time. The working class was always looking...

    • 1 小時 4 分鐘
    Florida v. Jamell Demons (YNW Melly)

    Florida v. Jamell Demons (YNW Melly)

    Greetings friends of In Summation - The Final Word.Today's episode explores the unusual trial of Jamell Demons, aka YNW Melly, who was charged with the double murder of his close friends in what prosecutors claimed was staged to look like a drive-by shooting.This case has it all: gang members, rap stars, lyrics about murder, unusual crime scene forensics, GPS location evidence, petty thin-skinned lawyers, and a lot of question marks left over at the end.Listen and get a little perspective on ...

    • 57 分鐘
    Wisconsin v. Mark Jensen

    Wisconsin v. Mark Jensen

    Welcome back one and all. In this installment of In Summation - The Final Word, Paul breaks down one of the elements of the 6th Amendment confrontation clause. Generally speaking, a criminal defendant has the right to confront an accuser, or someone producing evidence or testimony against them. This is the basis for the rule against using hearsay at trials.In our case today, Mark Jensen was accused of murdering his wife, Julie. Julie had become increasingly suspicious ...

    • 53 分鐘

熱門社會與文化 Podcast

台灣通勤第一品牌
台灣通勤第一品牌
好味小姐開束縛我還你原形
好味小姐
思維槓桿
麥可米克
唐陽雞酒屋
唐綺陽
呱吉
呱吉
馬克信箱 (Dear Marcy)
上班可以聽

你可能也會喜歡

The Political Orphanage
World's Smartest Podcast Network
True Crime Podcast 2024 - Police Interrogations, 911 Calls and True Police Stories Podcast
True Crime Podcast 2022
Dateline NBC
NBC News
Blood is Thicker: The Hargan Family Killings
CBS News
The Viall Files
Nick Viall
13th Juror Podcast
Brandi Churchwell