Episode 18 (Video) – Part 2 – Comparative Analysis of Moving Systems Models RelativityChallenge.Com Podcast
-
- Natural Sciences
In Episode 18, I present Part 2 of a 2 part presentation delivered at the AAAS/NPA Conference held in April 2008 at the University of New Mexico. This presentation compares and contrasts the models presented by Michelson-Morley, Lorentz, Einstein, and myself – clearly outlining the key assumptions behind each model. In addition, I summarize the finding that in two experiments – Ives-Stillwell and Michelson-Morley – that the Model of Complete and Incomplete Coordinate Systems yields greater accuracy than their Special Relativity-based equivalents. The following specific points are covered in this presentation.
Identify the assumptions that make up each of the key Moving System Model
Explanation of why the original Michelson-Morley Experiment does not support Fresnel’s (Aether-based) or Einstein’s (non Aether-based) theory
Explanation of why the revised Michelson-Morley Analysis supports Fresnel and the Model of Complete and Incomplete Coordinate Systems
Show that the equations associated with the Model of Complete and Incomplete Coordinate Systems produces better predictions than the Special Relativity-based equations for the Ives-Stillwell Atomic Clock experiment
In addition to the video, a presentation and the accompanying Comparison Chart are included in PDF form. Corrections have been made within the video as call-outs.
http://www.relativitychallenge.com/media/RelativityChallenge.com-Episode18_iPod.m4vDownload Podcast | Open Player in New Window
Download in Windows Media Player Format
Download Presentation in PDF Format
Download Comparison Chart in PDF Format
In Episode 18, I present Part 2 of a 2 part presentation delivered at the AAAS/NPA Conference held in April 2008 at the University of New Mexico. This presentation compares and contrasts the models presented by Michelson-Morley, Lorentz, Einstein, and myself – clearly outlining the key assumptions behind each model. In addition, I summarize the finding that in two experiments – Ives-Stillwell and Michelson-Morley – that the Model of Complete and Incomplete Coordinate Systems yields greater accuracy than their Special Relativity-based equivalents. The following specific points are covered in this presentation.
Identify the assumptions that make up each of the key Moving System Model
Explanation of why the original Michelson-Morley Experiment does not support Fresnel’s (Aether-based) or Einstein’s (non Aether-based) theory
Explanation of why the revised Michelson-Morley Analysis supports Fresnel and the Model of Complete and Incomplete Coordinate Systems
Show that the equations associated with the Model of Complete and Incomplete Coordinate Systems produces better predictions than the Special Relativity-based equations for the Ives-Stillwell Atomic Clock experiment
In addition to the video, a presentation and the accompanying Comparison Chart are included in PDF form. Corrections have been made within the video as call-outs.
http://www.relativitychallenge.com/media/RelativityChallenge.com-Episode18_iPod.m4vDownload Podcast | Open Player in New Window
Download in Windows Media Player Format
Download Presentation in PDF Format
Download Comparison Chart in PDF Format