
5,000+ Players in the Portal: Chaos or the Market Working?
Football 360 Show Notes 🎙️ Intro + Welcome (0:00–1:34)
-
Show open: "Welcome to the Football 360 Show — the fastest 48 minutes football talk on the planet."
-
Hosts introduced: JP Rock + Matt Beerman.
-
Back after a couple weeks off — holiday season schedule + time away.
-
JP talks about how he "gets lost in the holidays" and has a hard time returning to normal.
-
JP's holiday chaos: flu + COVID + bacterial/viral infection and a new baby.
-
New addition: CROI, 8 lbs 9 oz — "that's a football name."
-
-
Matt's holiday recap: time off for Christmas + New Year's, no travel this year (no Utah).
-
Quick shoutout: Merry Christmas / Happy New Year to listeners.
-
Tons of football happened; "interesting times" — Mizzou, transfer portal, and the bigger ecosystem.
-
Transfer portal reality: ~4,000 players in the portal.
-
Many may never play again.
-
Many are entering because they're being nudged out of programs.
-
-
Concern raised: Are we setting athletes up for academic success with multiple transfers?
-
Transferring once was hard enough — now it's common to transfer 3–4 times.
-
-
JP + Matt discuss how Congress and the Senate are now engaged in "fixing" college football.
-
A conspiracy-ish idea discussed:
-
NCAA may be letting chaos grow because they're tired of losing court cases
-
hoping Congress steps in and grants antitrust protection.
-
-
Matt's concern:
-
If NCAA gets antitrust protection, it could be bad for athletes
-
NCAA would regain leverage and return to controlling decisions in harmful ways.
-
-
Key reminder: don't ignore how we got here — athletes used to be trapped by transfer restrictions.
-
Example referenced: players previously denied transfers and forced to sit even if dropping levels.
-
Mentions "blacklisting" and the old system where schools had full control.
-
Tommy Tuberville mentioned as a Senator involved in the discussion.
-
Core thesis:
-
It's always been professional football
-
but only for TV networks, universities, and coaches.
-
Now athletes have "skin in the game," and people want to "pump the brakes."
-
-
The schools are angry because now they must pay athletes:
-
~$20–22M/year (revenue share baseline discussed)
-
which creates shortfalls, job losses, belt tightening.
-
-
Schools don't want collectives controlling NIL money — they want universities/NCAA to control it.
-
Discussion of NIL clearinghouse concept (anything over ~$600 being reviewed):
-
"third party intermediary" but funded/controlled by NCAA.
-
-
Major point: "Fair market value" is set by two parties agreeing — not a third party.
-
Predicts this becomes the next major lawsuit.
-
-
Matt argues the "athletes aren't employees" stance is weak:
-
athletes are told when to show up, what to wear, schedules, responsibilities — that's employment structure.
-
-
Trading "education" for labor wouldn't fly elsewhere.
-
The current chaos is framed as the market sorting itself out:
-
previously it should've been like this, but athletes had no agency.
-
-
Schools that used to pay under the table don't like that everyone can pay openly now.
-
"That's how you get Indiana rising" (example used to show new parity possibilities).
-
Matt + JP repeat the idea:
-
we're heading toward a super league reality.
-
If programs can't keep up financially, it'll show on the field.
-
-
"Base layer" is revenue share; NIL becomes the differentiator beyond that.
-
Matt notes many deals were front-loaded before NIL enforcement tightened.
-
Players may be living on "last year's contract reality" — and next year money could tighten.
-
Reiterates: denying NIL deals as "not fair market value" invites antitrust/commerce lawsuits.
-
Emphasis: NCAA wants control back; toothpaste isn't going back in the tube.
-
Predicts lawsuits around tampering.
-
Portal entries with "do not contact" strongly imply backchannel communication already happened.
-
Example: Mizzou player referenced (Bo Pribula mentioned) — didn't play bowl, then gone.
-
Matt describes the new ecosystem:
-
agents, reps, handlers — "a whole industry now."
-
-
Matt shares a story: one of their coaches got a call from a college coach asking about a portal kid.
-
Their stance:
-
"We don't represent them."
-
"We train and develop athletes."
-
Goal is athlete success, not making money off transfers or NIL.
-
-
Advice for families:
-
If you're a high-profile starter with real market value, an agent may help.
-
But it should be someone legit (e.g., lawyer/true negotiator), not a "wannabe."
-
-
Platforms mentioned:
-
YouTube + X
-
Football360Show.com
-
Saturday mornings 11 AM on KLS 590 AM (St. Louis) + "lootinfo.com" referenced
-
-
Portal remains the focus: 4,000 players, including local names.
-
Jacobi Oliphant: Oklahoma State → Kansas State
-
now ~6'4"/6'5", 230
-
connection thread: familiar coach relationships
-
-
Portal recruiting compared to the NFL:
-
players follow coaches, coaches bring known fits into systems.
-
-
Example: Iowa State roster attrition referenced (down to very low numbers at one point).
-
Washington State pipeline example mentioned; a cycle of roster stripping/refilling.
-
-
Timing debate:
-
some say portal should be spring
-
coaches want January entries to get them through spring ball and install.
-
-
Notes on "re-signing announcements":
-
signals stability to fans
-
also reflects that staying is now a two-way agreement
-
many kids are "encouraged" into portal without being officially cut.
-
-
Austin Romain: Kansas State → Texas Tech
-
former Elite Football Combine MVP
-
described as 6'6", 235, 4.6 forty, 35" vertical (as discussed)
-
-
Closing theme of the segment: don't let NCAA off the hook — they helped create the chaotic system; coaches and athletes are now living inside it. 5,000 in the Portal: Chaos or the Market Working?
Information
- Show
- FrequencyUpdated Weekly
- PublishedJanuary 7, 2026 at 3:22 AM UTC
- Length49 min
- Season2
- RatingClean