1 hr 20 min
61: Uncovering the Misconduct of Police, Prosecutors, and Judges w/Johann Drolshagen Public Defenseless
-
- Government
Thanks to the 1963 case of Brady v. Maryland, prosecutors are supposed to give the defense attorneys any evidence that may be beneficial to the defense’s case. Despite this requirement, police misconduct has been allowed to fester for decades as prosecutors and judges openly flaunt their mandates share this evidence. Furthermore, the legal profession itself fails to police prosecutors and judges who allow the misdeeds of police to go unchecked. This entire cycle calls into question decades worth of prosecutions because of potential failures to disclose evidence, but what can be done if everyone in the system is playing a role in allowing the corruption to continue?
This week, Hunter spoke with Johann Drolshagen, to answer that very question. Johann is the CEO of Level Playing Field solutions, and has helped to create a nationwide, publicly accessible database, called the brady list, to make it easier for communities to report and track misconduct by police, prosecutors, and judges. By bringing this information into the light of day, Johann hopes to combat the corruption gripping millions of Americans trapped in our criminal legal system.
Guests:
Johann Drolshagen, CEO Level Playing Field Solutions
Key Topics and Takeaways:
How Johann got Involved in the criminal legal system reform movement [6:40]
What is Brady [14:00]
How widespread is the issue? [14:40]
How police, prosecutors, and judges skirt Brady requirements [19:00]
The issues with attorneys policing attorneys [26:00]
What is the driving force behind these issues [30:00]
How the Brady List holds the powerful to account [32:00]
The issues facing Missouri and Oklahoma [42:53]
How to cut through the institutional hurdles [1:01:00]
Do people care about Due Process? [1:05:55]
What have the positive impacts of the list been? [1:10:35]
Resources:
Brady List
QuattroneCenter
Citizens Overseeing Police Oklahoma
People v Houser
Davis v Normandy
Richard Glossip Case
Follow Johann on Twitter
Contact Hunter Parnell:
hwparnell@publicdefenseless.com
Instagram
Twitter
www.publicdefenseless.com
Thanks to the 1963 case of Brady v. Maryland, prosecutors are supposed to give the defense attorneys any evidence that may be beneficial to the defense’s case. Despite this requirement, police misconduct has been allowed to fester for decades as prosecutors and judges openly flaunt their mandates share this evidence. Furthermore, the legal profession itself fails to police prosecutors and judges who allow the misdeeds of police to go unchecked. This entire cycle calls into question decades worth of prosecutions because of potential failures to disclose evidence, but what can be done if everyone in the system is playing a role in allowing the corruption to continue?
This week, Hunter spoke with Johann Drolshagen, to answer that very question. Johann is the CEO of Level Playing Field solutions, and has helped to create a nationwide, publicly accessible database, called the brady list, to make it easier for communities to report and track misconduct by police, prosecutors, and judges. By bringing this information into the light of day, Johann hopes to combat the corruption gripping millions of Americans trapped in our criminal legal system.
Guests:
Johann Drolshagen, CEO Level Playing Field Solutions
Key Topics and Takeaways:
How Johann got Involved in the criminal legal system reform movement [6:40]
What is Brady [14:00]
How widespread is the issue? [14:40]
How police, prosecutors, and judges skirt Brady requirements [19:00]
The issues with attorneys policing attorneys [26:00]
What is the driving force behind these issues [30:00]
How the Brady List holds the powerful to account [32:00]
The issues facing Missouri and Oklahoma [42:53]
How to cut through the institutional hurdles [1:01:00]
Do people care about Due Process? [1:05:55]
What have the positive impacts of the list been? [1:10:35]
Resources:
Brady List
QuattroneCenter
Citizens Overseeing Police Oklahoma
People v Houser
Davis v Normandy
Richard Glossip Case
Follow Johann on Twitter
Contact Hunter Parnell:
hwparnell@publicdefenseless.com
Instagram
Twitter
www.publicdefenseless.com
1 hr 20 min