Assessing the Impact of Peer Code Reviews

In this engaging episode, Mon-Chaio and Andy dive deep into the topic of peer code reviews. They begin by providing historical context, tracing back code review practices to IBM's research in the 70s and 80s, and examine the efficacy of modern-day peer reviews. The hosts debate the true benefits of code reviews, discussing whether they genuinely enhance quality or merely serve as a process ritual. They also explore alternative methods like pair programming, and propose innovative ideas for improving peer review processes, such as detailed walkthroughs and code review checklists.

Listeners are encouraged to experiment with different tactics and to consider feedback on their own peer review approaches. Join Mon-Chaio and Andy as they navigate the intricacies of peer reviews and share actionable insights for refining this critical practice in software engineering organizations.

References

• Investigating the effectiveness of peer code review in distributed software development based on objective and subjective data
• Advances in Software Inspections
• The Impact of Design and Code Reviews on Software Quality: An Empirical Study Based on PSP Data
• An empirical study of the impact of modern code reviewpractices on software quality
• Evaluating Pair Programming with Respect to System Complexity and Programmer Expertise
• Are Two Heads Better than One? On the Effectiveness of Pair Programming
• From Async Code Reviews to Co-Creation Patterns