51 episodes

This is the podcast from biomedicalpublishing.com. We will guide you through the process of overcoming writer's block so you can produce scientific papers of good quality and get them published.

Biomedical Publishing Podcast Jacob Rosenberg

    • Science
    • 5.0, 1 Rating

This is the podcast from biomedicalpublishing.com. We will guide you through the process of overcoming writer's block so you can produce scientific papers of good quality and get them published.

    Episode 51: literature search

    Episode 51: literature search

    Alle researchers need to search for previously published material. You can either do it in a loose fashion, so-called "surfing" for evidence, or you can perform a search systematically, e.g. for a systematic review.

    • 24 min
    Episode 50: practical data management

    Episode 50: practical data management

    There are strict rules about how to handle your data from a research project. You cannot put them on Dropbox or similar web-based repositories and you cannot save them on the hard drive of your personal computer. 

    • 5 min
    Episode 49: Good Clinical Practice

    Episode 49: Good Clinical Practice

    It is mandatory to follow the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) rules for trials involving drugs. This episode will give you the background and the main content of the GCP regulations and what it practically means to you when running the study. It is no way a full description of the GCP concept but will give you the highlights so that you can find further details yourself.

    • 11 min
    Episode 48: critical phases

    Episode 48: critical phases

    There will for certain be critical phases in your research process, This episode will go through the critical phases in the protocol, data acquisition, analysis, manuscript and publication phases. Most problems can be prevented.

    • 17 min
    Episode 47: write a systemativ review

    Episode 47: write a systemativ review

    You do not need to be an expert in the clinical field to write a systematic review. It is a fairly easy process because it follows a specific guideline (the PRISMA guideline), and it is also fairly easy to get it accepted for publication in a journal if you do it the right way. And importantly, you will automatically read the necessary literature in your research field. The only drawback is that you have to invest the necessary time and energy, but that is not really a negative thing. So go ahead and write a systematic review in your field of research. 

    • 16 min
    Episode 46: COPE

    Episode 46: COPE

    If problems arise with serious author disputes or question about research integrity then journal editors go to COPE for advice. You should therefore know about this important ressource that is freely available on the internet.

    • 6 min

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5
1 Rating

1 Rating

Top Podcasts In Science

Listeners Also Subscribed To