Catching the Long Island Serial Killer True Crime Today

Want to listen to all of the content from the True Crime Today and Hidden Killers podcast universe, AD FREE and in ADVANCE?

This is the place to do it!

1) Simply SUBSCRIBE to True Crime Today Premium Plus on Apple Podcasts monthly or yearly, and you're IN!!

2) IMPORTANT; Then, be sure to follow the True Crime Today Premium Plus channel on Apple Podcasts for ALL of the AD FREE and ADVANCE CONTENT. THIS IS A SEPARATE CHANNEL that hosts all of the ALL of the AD FREE and ADVANCE CONTENT.

NOTE: ALL AD-FREE and ADVANCE content will only be posted to the True Crime Today Premium Plus channel on Apple Podcasts. If you subscribe to any of our channels and want the AD-FREE and ADVANCE podcasts, you need to follow the True Crime Today Premium Plus channel to access these premium features.

In the perplexing case of Rex Heuermann, the alleged Long Island serial killer, a chilling development has surfaced: a pen pal relationship with Keith Jesperson, the notorious Happy Face Killer. This unlikely correspondence, revealed in the latest episode of "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, featuring psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott, adds a macabre twist to an already dark narrative.
 
 In prison, solitude can be overwhelming, and receiving letters might offer a glimpse of connection to the outside world. But the choice of Heuermann to correspond with another serial killer is peculiar and raises serious questions about his psyche. Jesperson, infamous for craving attention and sending letters adorned with happy faces to media outlets, now appears to be assuming a mentor-like role for Heuermann. This interaction, as Scott points out, seems to be a display of serial killer narcissism, where Jesperson enjoys the limelight as a self-perceived figure of importance and authority.
 
 The letters exchanged between Jesperson and Heuermann, however, are not just idle banter. Jesperson provides advice on prison life and handling legal matters, with a particular focus on advising Heuermann to confess if guilty. Intriguingly, Heuermann's response to Jesperson is marked by gratitude and a lack of denial of his alleged crimes. "Thank you for your letters and advice. They have been a help and a comfort to me. I do understand what you have said and I have taken it to heart," Heuermann writes, notably omitting any assertion of innocence. This response, as Scott notes, is unsettling and may carry deeper implications than the words convey.
 
 The handwriting in Heuermann's letter, replete with spelling errors, only adds to the eerie nature of this communication. The fact that Heuermann has chosen Jesperson as his sole pen pal from among many who have written to him is telling. The specificity of this choice suggests a bond or a shared understanding with Jesperson, a convicted serial killer, which could be seen as damning for Heuermann, who maintains his innocence.
 
 The relationship between Jesperson and Heuermann seems to have been facilitated by Jesperson's daughter, who initially set up a GoFundMe for Asa Ellerup, Heuermann’s wife. This connection raises questions about the motives behind the correspondence. Was it an orchestrated attempt by Jesperson’s daughter, an advocate for victims, to persuade Heuermann towards a confession, or was it a mere ploy for Jesperson to gain attention?
 
 Scott’s analysis of the letters reveals a potential use of coded language, further deepening the mystery of this bizarre interaction. This detail, if true, could signify a level of complicity or a shared secret understanding between the two men, veiled from public comprehension.
 
 The case of Rex Heuermann, already shrouded in darkness and complexity, is now further complicated by this peculiar pen pal relationship. As details continue to emerge, the public and legal communities are left to ponder the implications of Heuermann’s interactions with Jesperson. What does this unusual alliance reveal about Heuermann’s character and his role in the alleged crimes? As Scott aptly puts it, this is "just another layer that's going to go into the annals of history about strange things about serial killers."
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the complex and unfolding case of Rex Heuermann, the alleged Long Island serial killer, the question of optics and public perception has become increasingly crucial. In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, Defense Attorney Bob Motta discussed the intricate details of this case, particularly focusing on Heuermann's relationship with his wife, Asa Ellerup, and his unusual correspondence with Keith Jesperson, the Happy Face Killer.
 
 Heuermann's situation is further complicated by the fact that his wife, Asa, has a documentary crew, led by 50 Cent's G Unit production team, following her around. The optics of this, as Motta points out, are far from ideal. The decision to have a documentary crew shadow Asa while her husband faces such serious charges raises numerous questions about her judgment and the potential impact on the case.
 
 Motta, with his experience as a defense attorney, critically analyzes the implications of Heuermann's actions, particularly his correspondence with Jesperson. Heuermann’s response to Jesperson's advice – to admit guilt and move on – is telling, especially considering the context in which this advice is given. Motta interprets this as a significant indicator of Heuermann's state of mind and potentially his guilt.
 
 The conversation then shifts to Asa Ellerup’s role in this complex scenario. Motta questions her decision to participate in the documentary, given the ongoing legal proceedings against her husband. He draws parallels to the infamous "The Jinx" documentary about Robert Durst, underscoring how such media exposure can backfire dramatically. Motta expresses concern that the documentary might not be a bid for sympathy for Asa but rather a ploy to link her to the crimes or to reveal her complicity.
 
 Motta also delves into the details of new DNA evidence found on one of the victims, which could potentially implicate Asa Ellerup. This development adds another layer of complexity to the case, raising the stakes for both Asa and Rex Heuermann. Motta speculates on the nature of this DNA and its potential to change the direction of the case.
 
 Considering the current evidence against Rex Heuermann, including DNA linking him to the bodies, Motta discusses the likelihood of the case going to trial. He weighs in on the various factors that could influence Heuermann's decision, including whether the prosecution pursues the death penalty or offers a life sentence deal.
 
 Brueski and Motta delve into the larger implications of the case, pondering the role of law enforcement and the potential impact of the leadership changes in the Suffolk County police department. They discuss how these changes might affect the ongoing investigation and the future of the case.
 
 In concluding the conversation, Motta emphasizes the critical role of public opinion in shaping the jury pool and the importance of managing optics in high-profile cases like this. He suggests that Heuermann's current path, including his interactions with a convicted serial killer, could significantly damage his case in the eyes of the public and the jury.
 
 The interview with Bob Motta provides a nuanced understanding of the Rex Heuermann case, shedding light on the legal, ethical, and psychological aspects at play. As the case continues to evolve, with new evidence and developments coming to light, the conversation leaves the audience with a deeper appreciation of the complexities involved and the potential outcomes that await.



Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent

In the latest chapter of the Alex Murdaugh saga, a recent courtroom appearance has stirred widespread discussion and analysis, particularly concerning his response to victim impact statements. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, along with Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI Special Agent, delve into Murdaugh's behavior, revealing a complex tapestry of narcissism and self-victimization.
 
 Murdaugh, who stands accused of financial crimes, has been the subject of intense scrutiny. During his recent court appearance, he was given the opportunity to respond to victim impact statements. This response, however, veered into what Coffindaffer describes as "self-serving statements," aligning with a classic narcissist's playbook. "He should have gone to Hollywood," Coffindaffer remarks, highlighting Murdaugh's persuasive speaking skills, which she believes overshadow the genuine, heartfelt statements of the true victims.
 
 This courtroom episode has left many perplexed and divided. Some viewers found Murdaugh's speech moving, while others, including Coffindaffer, remain convinced of his guilt in the associated murder case. Brueski notes that most people find it challenging to comprehend how someone could commit such heinous acts against their own family, contributing to the divided public opinion. "We live with people like Alex Murdaugh. They're out there all the time," he asserts, acknowledging the unsettling reality of such personalities in society.
 
 The stark contrast between Murdaugh's statements and those of the actual victims was apparent. The victims spoke sincerely, directly from the heart, lacking Murdaugh's level of manipulation. This juxtaposition, as Coffindaffer points out, served to emphasize Murdaugh's theatricality and lack of genuine remorse. Brueski also expresses surprise at the amount of time Judge Clifton Newman allowed Murdaugh to speak, which turned the courtroom into a stage for Murdaugh's performance.
 
 Murdaugh's courtroom demeanor was characterized by a striking lack of empathy and a tendency to correct the narratives of his victims. In one instance, he insisted that it was solely he and his wife, Maggie, who raised their children, directly contradicting statements made by others about Gloria Satterfield's significant role in the children's upbringing. Coffindaffer observes, "He just can't help that narcissistic 'it's me, it's what we did, it's I.'"
 
 The episode culminated in Judge Newman’s blunt assessment of Murdaugh as an "empty human being." This sentiment echoed throughout the courtroom, particularly in moments where Murdaugh sought to interject and 'correct' the perceptions of his victims. Coffindaffer reflects on this, noting the lack of genuine empathy for the victims and Murdaugh's persistent self-aggrandizement.
 
 In closing, Brueski poses a lingering question: What does this latest courtroom spectacle reveal about the true nature of Alex Murdaugh, and how will it influence public perception as his legal battles continue? As the case unfolds, the public and legal communities remain riveted, seeking answers in a story that consistently defies expectations and norms.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the ever-unfolding saga of Rex Heuermann, the alleged Long Island serial killer, a new and bizarre twist has emerged, adding another layer of complexity to an already convoluted narrative. Heuermann, who has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him, has found a peculiar source of solace: Keith Jesperson, infamously known as the Happy Face Killer. The development of their pen pal relationship raises questions about Heuermann's mindset and the optics of associating with a convicted serial killer.
 
 In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott delve into the implications of this unusual correspondence. "Jesperson is known as Igor, and Heuermann is known as Ogre," Scott notes, highlighting the unusual nicknames that add to the strangeness of their interaction. Jesperson, a notorious figure for his attention-seeking behavior, has always enjoyed the spotlight. His outreach to Heuermann appears to be another act of serial killer narcissism, an attempt to stay relevant and feel important.
 
 Heuermann's response to Jesperson's letters adds to the intrigue. His expressions of gratitude and acknowledgment that Jesperson's advice has been a comfort to him are curious, especially considering Heuermann's insistence on his innocence. "He never said, 'Oh, by the way, I’m innocent. I didn’t do it.' He said, 'I’ll consider your advice,'" Scott points out. This lack of assertion of innocence in his reply to Jesperson could be seen as telling.
 
 The handwriting in Heuermann's letter, replete with spelling errors and a certain creepiness, offers another avenue for analysis. His choice to communicate only with Jesperson, dismissing other correspondences, suggests a bond or understanding with the convicted killer that warrants further examination.
 
 The connection between Jesperson and Heuermann seems to have stemmed from Jesperson's daughter, who initially set up a GoFundMe for Asa Ellerup, Heuermann's wife. The daughter's role as an advocate for victims and her questionable decision to support Ellerup raises questions about her involvement in facilitating this communication. Was this an attempt to encourage Heuermann to admit guilt and spare further pain for the victims' families? "It's certainly plausible," Scott muses, acknowledging the complexities of this situation.
 
 The optics of this relationship are undeniably bizarre, especially in a case already shrouded in mystery and controversy. As Brueski and Scott discuss, every new revelation in the Heuermann case adds another layer of strangeness to an already unusual story. The implications of Heuermann's interactions with Jesperson, the potential coded language in their letters, and the connection to Jesperson's daughter are just some of the aspects that make this case both fascinating and disturbing.
 
 As the case continues to unfold, the public and legal communities alike are left pondering what this latest development means for Heuermann's defense and the overall narrative of the alleged Long Island serial killer. With so many questions still unanswered, the world watches and waits to see what other twists and turns this case might take.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, a compelling discussion unfolds with Defense Attorney and Host of the podcast Defense Diaries, Bob Motta. The conversation centers on Asa Ellerup, the wife of Rex Heuermann, the alleged Long Island serial killer. A critical element of the discussion is the controversial documentary being produced about Ellerup by 50 Cent's G Unit production team, set to air on Peacock.
 
 Ellerup, who filed for but has not completed a divorce from Heuermann, presents an enigmatic figure. Despite not being charged with any crime, her actions and the impending documentary raise eyebrows. Brueski and Motta delve into the implications of such a documentary, especially considering the ongoing trial of her husband. Motta, with his legal expertise, offers a critical perspective on the situation.
 
 Motta expresses skepticism about the documentary's intent, suspecting it aims to link Ellerup to the crimes or prove her complicity. The documentary, he argues, is unlikely to be a sympathy piece for Ellerup. Instead, Motta sees it as an investigative tool designed to expose any involvement or knowledge Ellerup might have had in her husband's alleged crimes. He warns of the potential pitfalls, drawing parallels to the infamous "The Jinx" documentary, which played a pivotal role in Robert Durst's conviction.
 
 The conversation turns to the recent discovery of Ellerup's DNA on one of the victims, a development that significantly heightens the intrigue surrounding her. This new evidence, if substantiated, could place Ellerup in an incriminating position. Motta and Brueski speculate on the nature of this DNA evidence and its potential implications for Ellerup.
 
 Motta criticizes Ellerup’s decision to participate in the documentary, considering it a grave mistake. He argues that her participation in the documentary, particularly in light of the new DNA evidence, could be detrimental to her case. Motta anticipates that law enforcement will be keen to subpoena the documentary footage, which could reveal crucial details not yet known to the public or the police.
 
 Brueski raises the point that Ellerup has not been officially questioned by the police, suggesting that law enforcement might be biding their time, waiting for her to reveal more through the documentary. Motta concurs, seeing the documentary as a potential goldmine of information for prosecutors.
 
 The conversation highlights the complex web of legal, ethical, and public perception issues surrounding the Heuermann case. Motta’s insights reveal the potential risks and consequences of Ellerup’s involvement in the documentary, especially in the context of the ongoing investigation into her husband’s alleged crimes.
 
 As the discussion concludes, Brueski and Motta agree on the poor optics of Ellerup's decision to participate in the documentary. They emphasize the precarious position she finds herself in, with the documentary potentially serving as a tool for her incrimination.
 
 The interview leaves the audience pondering the intricate dynamics at play in the Heuermann case and the role of media in shaping public perception and potentially influencing legal outcomes. With Ellerup's actions under scrutiny and the documentary's production underway, the case continues to captivate and intrigue, raising as many questions as it answers.



Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen