38 episodes

This podcast is part of The Quill & Sword series of podcasts created and hosted by The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School (TJAGLCS). Produced by the TJAGLCS Criminal Law Department, the podcast offers a 10-20 minute discussion about every published CAAF opinion—"CAAF Chats"—as well as a curated assortment of selected topics related to military justice - "Military Justice Grab Bag." Two shows, one channel. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).

Criminal Law Department Presents The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School

    • Government
    • 5.0 • 35 Ratings

This podcast is part of The Quill & Sword series of podcasts created and hosted by The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School (TJAGLCS). Produced by the TJAGLCS Criminal Law Department, the podcast offers a 10-20 minute discussion about every published CAAF opinion—"CAAF Chats"—as well as a curated assortment of selected topics related to military justice - "Military Justice Grab Bag." Two shows, one channel. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 34: U.S. v. Flores (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 34: U.S. v. Flores (C.A.A.F 2024)

    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Flores. This case examines sentence appropriateness review under the new sentencing procedures established by the Military Justice Act of 2016. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 33: U.S. v. Driskill (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 33: U.S. v. Driskill (C.A.A.F 2024)

    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Driskill. This case examines Double Jeopardy and its application to offenses charged under Article 134. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 32: U.S. v. Ramirez (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 32: U.S. v. Ramirez (C.A.A.F 2024)

    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Ramirez. Specifically, we examine when a military judge must allow questions concerning racial bias during voir dire - while discussing voir dire and bias generally. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 31: U.S. v. Warda (C.A.A.F 2023)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 31: U.S. v. Warda (C.A.A.F 2023)

    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Warda. Here, the CAAF examines the remedy when the Government is unable to produce documents required by Rule for Courts-Martial 703. The Court provides rules for practitioners concerning their discovery obligations. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 30: U.S. v. Brown (C.A.A.F 2024)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 30: U.S. v. Brown (C.A.A.F 2024)

    In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Brown. Specifically, we examine CAAF's view of Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Marital and what constitutes "presence" for disrespect of a noncommissioned officer. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp You can also connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 29: U.S. v. Gilmet (C.A.A.F 2023)

    Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 29: U.S. v. Gilmet (C.A.A.F 2023)

    In this episode, we examine CAAF’s latest case concerning unlawful command influence. Specifically, we examine the difference between actual and apparent unlawful command influence, and the influence that judge advocates can have on the system. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp You can also connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5
35 Ratings

35 Ratings

Random CPT ,

Great Resources

These are great case summaries!

simple country lawyer ,

Great resource

Walters and Dray are dynamic play-by-play and color commentary duo on the order of Herbstreit and Fowler. Keep up the great work and thanks for the insights.

ccwalters ,

Great for Military Justice Practitioners

This will be a great resource for practitioners in military justice to stay up to date on recent appellate cases impacting the practice.

Top Podcasts In Government

Strict Scrutiny
Crooked Media
The Lawfare Podcast
The Lawfare Institute
5-4
Prologue Projects
The Young Turks
TYT Network
The Chris Plante Show
WMAL | Cumulus Podcast Network | Cumulus Media Washington
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Oyez

You Might Also Like

We the People
National Constitution Center
The Daily
The New York Times
The Lawfare Podcast
The Lawfare Institute
Advisory Opinions
The Dispatch
Divided Argument
Will Baude, Dan Epps
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Oyez