1 hr
Due process and data: key components of justice innovation with Tania Sourdin Reimagining Justice
-
- Business
Episode no. 51 features Professor Tania Sourdin, Dean and Head of University of Newcastle School of Law. Our discussion covers:
the impact of Covid19 on the profession; what’s surprised her about online disputer resolution during the pandemic; the difference between Supportive, replacement and disruptive tech; the role that legal professionals should take in adoption of technology and their innovation readiness; the need for a uniform and national ethical framework for technology adoption in law; suggestions for regulation including sandboxes which allow for safe experimentation; what the legal profession can learn from service delivery in other professions including medicine; appropriate and inappropriate uses of technology and how different client cohorts engage; the digital divide even within the profession; the lack of meaningful data being collected by courts; and Tania’s definition of legal innovation! Proudly sponsored by Neota Logic and Legally Yours.
Links:
“Justice in the age of technology: ’The rise of machines is upon us’” “Judges, Technology and Artificial Intelligence - The Artificial Judge“ Legally Yours Neota Logic Impact 25 Pro Bono Awards ACT Law Society webinar "What Are We Not Talking About?" Andrea Perry-Petersen – LinkedIn - Twitter @winkiepp – andreaperrypetersen.com.au
Twitter - @ReimaginingJ
Facebook – Reimagining Justice group
Episode no. 51 features Professor Tania Sourdin, Dean and Head of University of Newcastle School of Law. Our discussion covers:
the impact of Covid19 on the profession; what’s surprised her about online disputer resolution during the pandemic; the difference between Supportive, replacement and disruptive tech; the role that legal professionals should take in adoption of technology and their innovation readiness; the need for a uniform and national ethical framework for technology adoption in law; suggestions for regulation including sandboxes which allow for safe experimentation; what the legal profession can learn from service delivery in other professions including medicine; appropriate and inappropriate uses of technology and how different client cohorts engage; the digital divide even within the profession; the lack of meaningful data being collected by courts; and Tania’s definition of legal innovation! Proudly sponsored by Neota Logic and Legally Yours.
Links:
“Justice in the age of technology: ’The rise of machines is upon us’” “Judges, Technology and Artificial Intelligence - The Artificial Judge“ Legally Yours Neota Logic Impact 25 Pro Bono Awards ACT Law Society webinar "What Are We Not Talking About?" Andrea Perry-Petersen – LinkedIn - Twitter @winkiepp – andreaperrypetersen.com.au
Twitter - @ReimaginingJ
Facebook – Reimagining Justice group
1 hr