Vienna Coffee House Conversations with Ivan Vejvoda

Institute for Human Sciences, Ivan Vejvoda
Vienna Coffee House Conversations with Ivan Vejvoda

At this pivotal moment for Europe and the liberal democratic order, this podcast series from the Institute For Human Sciences explores the undercurrents, tensions and dilemmas that the continent is facing and will will face in the near term. In conversation with leading figures in the field, civil society pioneer Ivan Vejvoda is your guide to the diverse and complex preoccupations of an uncertain time.

  1. 27 THG 11

    Episode 41: Europe Under Trump: Strategic Challenges and Opportunities with Rosa Balfour

    In this episode of the Vienna Coffee House Conversations podcast, Ivan Vejvoda hosts Rosa Balfour, Director of Carnegie Europe, for a deep discussion on the implications of Donald Trump’s return to the presidency for Europe. They explore how Europe has adjusted—or failed to adjust—since Trump’s initial term, focusing on key challenges in trade, defense, and foreign policy. Balfour outlines the vulnerabilities Trump’s policies exploit, including Europe's dependence on the U.S. for security and energy and its fragmented approach to strategic autonomy. The conversation transitions to broader themes of European Union dynamics, from its struggle with internal reforms to balancing technocratic governance with democratic accountability. Balfour reflects on the stagnation in EU integration and how internal divisions undermine its global standing. The discussion also highlights the geopolitical challenges presented by Ukraine, Russia, and the EU’s enlargement ambitions, offering cautious optimism about Europe's ability to adapt to these pressures over time. Ending on a hopeful note, the episode underscores the importance of leadership and unity in navigating the turbulent geopolitical landscape. Despite grim short-term prospects, Balfour expresses confidence in Europe’s resilience and creativity to address the challenges ahead, urging collaboration between policymakers, civil society, and the public sphere.

    48 phút
  2. 13 THG 11

    Episode 40: Strengthening European Defense with Nicole Koenig

    In this episode of the Vienna Coffee House Conversations, host Ivan Vejvoda welcomes Nicole Koenig, Head of Policy at the Munich Security Conference, to discuss the evolving landscape of European security. Against the backdrop of the Russo-Ukrainian War and other global crises, they explore how the European Union has responded to these challenges with initiatives that include joint defense spending, the inclusion of Finland and Sweden in NATO, and the establishment of a European Defense Union. Koenig highlights the complexities of fostering deeper EU-NATO cooperation and overcoming political, legal, and financial barriers to a more integrated defense framework. Recorded just before Donald Trump's victory, they discuss the U.S. presidential election and it's impacts on European security policy. The conversation explores the necessity for Europe to take on a greater share of its defense responsibilities. Koenig underscores the strategic importance of unity in defense and the push for a more coherent security policy. Additionally, they touch on the geopolitical imperative of EU enlargement, particularly in light of the Russo-Ukrainian War and the broader European neighborhood's security dynamics. Finally, Koenig offers insights into her role at the Munich Security Conference, providing a preview of the key themes likely to shape the agenda, including transatlantic relations, regional conflicts, and emerging threats like AI and climate security. She emphasizes the importance of fostering dialogue to address these multifaceted challenges.

    34 phút
  3. 16 THG 10

    Episode 38: Political Shifts in Slovakia with Grigorij Mesežnikov

    In this episode of the Vienna Coffee House Conversations, Ivan Vejvoda sits down with Grigorij Mesežnikov, a political scientist and president of the Institute for Public Affairs in Slovakia. They discuss the complex political history of Slovakia, which has transitioned from an authoritarian regime in the 1990s to a successful democracy, only to face significant regression in recent years. Mesežnikov outlines the rise and fall of democratic governance in Slovakia, emphasizing the return of Robert Fico and his national-populist party to power. Fico’s return, Mesežnikov explains, was driven by public dissatisfaction with the previous government and his desire to escape legal prosecution by reasserting political dominance. The conversation then shifts to Slovakia’s relationship with Russia and the influence of pro-Russian sentiment within the country, particularly in the wake of the Russo-Ukrainian War. Mesežnikov highlights how historical and cultural ties between Slovakia and Russia have shaped public opinion, creating a divide between those who support liberal democracy and those more aligned with nationalist, anti-systemic forces. Despite this, Mesežnikov points out that support for EU membership remains high, though attitudes toward NATO have grown more skeptical. Finally, the discussion touches on the future of Slovakia’s democracy. Mesežnikov expresses cautious optimism that opposition parties, if united and strategically focused, may have a chance to reverse the recent backsliding in the next elections. The conversation ends on a note of hope, emphasizing the resilience of democratic institutions and the potential for change.

    42 phút
  4. 21 THG 8

    Episode 37: Europe, China, and the Future of Global Politics with Sławomir Sierakowski

    In this episode of the Vienna Coffee House Conversations podcast, host Ivan Vejvoda engages in an insightful discussion with Sławomir Sierakowski, a Polish sociologist, literary critic, journalist, and public intellectual. Sierakowski, who heads Kritika Polityczna and serves as a senior fellow at the German Council on Foreign Relations, shares his perspectives on the state of democracy in Europe, Poland's political landscape, and the broader global context, including the impact of the Russo-Ukrainian War and the geopolitical shifts in Asia. The episode begins with Ivan welcoming Słavwomir, acknowledging his distinguished career and ongoing contributions to European intellectual and political discourse. The conversation opens with a discussion on the current political moment in Europe, focusing on recent elections in France and Poland. Sławomir reflects on the mixed results of these elections, particularly noting the positive outcome in Poland, where authoritarianism was successfully challenged in the recent parliamentary elections. He emphasizes that Poland is rejoining democratic Europe, aligning itself with countries that uphold the rule of law and democratic norms. However, he cautions that challenges remain, particularly with authoritarian trends in countries like Hungary. Key Points of Discussion: The State of Democracy in Europe: Question: Ivan asks Sławomir about the current political situation in Europe, with a focus on elections and the rising tensions between liberal democracy and authoritarianism. Answer: Sławomir expresses a nuanced view, acknowledging positive developments, such as Poland's electoral defeat of authoritarian forces, but also highlighting ongoing concerns about Hungary and other regions. He notes that while populism has not caused a major revolution, it remains a significant challenge in the fight for democracy in Europe. China's Geopolitical Position: Question: Shifting the focus to Asia, Ivan asks Sławomir to elaborate on his observations regarding China, particularly Xi Jinping's leadership and its implications for global politics. Answer: Sławomir outlines two major shifts under Xi Jinping: China’s increasingly aggressive foreign policy and its move toward state-organized protectionism. He contrasts this with previous Chinese leaders who adhered to a more cautious approach. He also highlights internal challenges in China, such as economic issues, and stresses that China's position is more vulnerable than it appears, especially in its relations with neighboring countries like Japan and Taiwan. Taiwan and the Asia-Pacific: Question: Ivan inquires about Sławomir's recent trip to Taiwan and asks for his impressions regarding Taiwan's outlook amidst tensions with China. Answer: Sławomir describes the complex political dynamics in Taiwan, where the pro-China Kuomintang party holds significant influence. However, he points out that the majority of Taiwanese citizens are opposed to unification with China, especially after the events in Hong Kong. He emphasizes Taiwan’s strategic importance due to its dominance in semiconductor manufacturing and its growing defense capabilities. Europe’s Role in Global Geopolitics: Question: Ivan brings the discussion back to Europe, asking what Europe should be doing in this evolving global context. Answer: Sławomir argues that Europe needs to adopt a tougher stance, both internally and externally. He criticizes the EU for its history of slow decision-making and compromise, urging it to take bolder steps, especially in supporting Ukraine militarily and financially. He sees Poland under Donald Tusk as a potential leader in driving this change, highlighting Tusk’s experience and commitment to European integration. The De-Authoritarianization of Poland: Question: Ivan asks how the process of dismantling authoritarian structures in Poland is progressing following the recent electoral victory over the PiS party. Answer: Sławomir explains that the process is slow, as the new government is committed to upholding democratic norms and the rule of law, which requires careful and legal dismantling of authoritarian systems. He also points out that the Polish president and judiciary, still influenced by the former ruling party, present ongoing challenges to this process. The Future of the EU and Ukraine: Question: Ivan shifts focus to the EU’s enlargement and the potential integration of Ukraine. He asks Sławomir how realistic it is to bring Ukraine into the EU, given the complexities involved. Answer: Sławomir acknowledges the difficulties of integrating Ukraine into the EU, especially during a time of war. However, he stresses the importance of supporting Ukraine’s accession to both the EU and NATO to prevent future Russian aggression. He warns that any compromise with Russia that allows it to retain control over parts of Ukraine would be a dangerous signal to other authoritarian regimes. Populism and the Impact of AI: Question: Ivan raises concerns about rising populism driven by economic uncertainty and technological changes, such as the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on jobs and society. Answer: Sławomir notes that AI and overinvestment in technology could trigger a financial crisis, which historically has led to the rise of populist movements. He warns that a global recession could exacerbate these issues, creating a more volatile political landscape across Europe and beyond. Poland’s Role in European Politics: Question: Ivan asks how Poland can position itself as a leader in European politics, particularly in the context of its relationship with Ukraine and its internal political challenges. Answer: Sławomir sees potential for Poland to take a more active role in European politics, especially under Donald Tusk’s leadership. However, he cautions that internal polarization and conflicts between political factions in Poland could limit its ability to fully realize this potential. He also mentions the historical tensions between Poland and Ukraine, which continue to complicate their relationship. Hungary and Slovakia’s Influence on the EU: Question: Ivan addresses the challenge posed by Hungary and Slovakia, whose populist governments have the power to block EU decisions, and asks Sławomir for his thoughts on how the EU should handle this situation. Answer: Sławomir highlights the danger of Hungary and Slovakia obstructing EU policies, particularly regarding Ukraine. He argues that the EU needs to reform its decision-making processes to prevent single countries from blocking critical initiatives. He warns that without such reforms, the EU could be paralyzed by populist leaders. Conclusion: The episode concludes with a reflection on the complex challenges facing Europe and the world. Sławomir stresses the importance of strong, decisive leadership in Europe to navigate these turbulent times. He expresses hope that Poland, under Tusk’s leadership, can play a key role in shaping Europe’s future. Ivan thanks Sławomir for his insights, and the conversation ends with a mutual commitment to continue addressing these critical issues in future discussions.

    40 phút
  5. 17 THG 7

    Episode 36: Transitology in the 21st Century with Philippe C. Schmitter

    In this episode, Ivan Vejvoda is joined by Philippe C. Schmitter to discuss the current state and future of democracy, particularly in the context of rising populism and authoritarianism. Known for his influential works on transitions from authoritarian rule and the democratization of the European Union, Schmitter explores the impact of the EU's parliamentary elections, the return of the Labour Party to power in the UK, as well as the rise of nationalism and identity politics. Schmitter offers insights into the concept of "transitology" and its relevance today, drawing parallels between past transitions from authoritarian regimes and current political trends. The discussion also touches on the challenges of liberal democracy, the role of political parties, and the effects of globalization on economic and political systems. Schmitter emphasizes the need to reinvent representation and control the behavior of global finance to address rising inequality and populism. Synopsis: Vejvoda asks Schmitter about his background and significant contributions to political science. Schmitter highlights his role as Emeritus Professor of the Department of Political and Social Sciences at the European University Institute in Florence. He discusses his expertise in democracy, democratic transitions, authoritarianism, and populism, mentioning his influential books, "Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies" and "How to Democratize the European Union and Why Bother?" Understanding Political Transitions Vejvoda probes Schmitter on the concept of political transitions post-Berlin Wall. Schmitter explains the unpredictable nature of political transitions, reflecting on the mistaken belief that democracy would naturally prevail after the Soviet Union's collapse. He underscores the ongoing relevance of his work in the context of current global political shifts. Challenges to Liberal Democracy Vejvoda inquires about the modern challenges facing liberal democracy. Schmitter discusses the dual challenges of global capitalism and the decline of traditional political parties. He details how these factors have led to the rise of populism and significant income inequality, necessitating a reinvention of democratic systems. Critique of Governance Vejvoda asks Schmitter to elaborate on his views regarding governance. Schmitter critiques the term "governance" as ambiguous and often a cover for the decline of democratic accountability. He contrasts governance with traditional government and highlights the increasing role of non-elected bodies in policy-making. Future of the European Union Vejvoda questions Schmitter about the future prospects of the European Union. Schmitter shares his thoughts on the EU's challenges with enlargement and the concept of differentiated integration. He envisions a core group of countries advancing integration and setting an example for others, despite the inherent difficulties. Impact of Populism Vejvoda explores the impact of populism on modern democracies. Schmitter acknowledges that while populism is an intrinsic part of democratic processes, it can destabilize systems if unchecked. He emphasizes the importance of effective democratic institutions to manage populist movements. Concluding Reflections Vejvoda seeks Schmitter’s final thoughts on the resilience of democracy. Schmitter expresses cautious optimism, maintaining confidence in the collective intelligence of citizens to uphold democratic values. He stresses the need for continuous adaptation and reform in democratic governance.

    40 phút
  6. 3 THG 7

    Episode 35: Orbán, Populism, and the Legal Path to Autocracy with Kim Lane Scheppele

    In this episode of the Vienna Coffee House Conversations, Ivan Vejvoda hosts Kim Lane Scheppele, the Lawrence S. Rockefeller Professor of Sociology and International Affairs at Princeton University. With a particular focus on the example of Hungary under Orbán, they explore the rise of populism, identity politics, and nationalism, and point out the threats these pose to democracy - especially when leaders exploit the legal frameworks of democratic institutions to entrench and extend their power. How can populism corrupt a democratic state into an autocracy? Synopsis: The Difference Between Populism and Autocracy Vejvoda asks Scheppele to explain the distinction between populism and autocracy. Scheppele outlines how populism involves appeals to intolerance and creating second-class citizenships, while autocracy involves changing laws to entrench power and eliminate opposition. She emphasizes that not all populist leaders seek dictatorship, but many use populist slogans to justify autocratic actions. Viktor Orbán's Use of Legal Mechanisms Vejvoda inquires about Orbán's use of legal mechanisms to consolidate power in Hungary. Scheppele details how Orbán manipulated Hungary’s electoral system to gain a supermajority, allowing him to change the constitution, capture courts, sideline the parliament, and alter election laws to entrench his power. She explains the systematic dismantling of democratic checks and balances through legal means. The European Union’s Role in Addressing Democratic Backslides Vejvoda questions the EU’s effectiveness in addressing democratic backslides in Hungary and Poland. Scheppele discusses the EU’s struggle to respond effectively, noting that Orbán's actions were legal, making intervention difficult. In contrast, Poland’s government openly violated its constitution, prompting a stronger EU response. She highlights the EU’s slow and inconsistent actions due to other priorities, like the euro crisis. Changes in Hungary's Political Atmosphere Since the 1990s Vejvoda asks about the political changes in Hungary from the 1990s to the present. Scheppele reflects on Hungary’s pro-European, democratic atmosphere in the 1990s, characterized by strong support for European values and institutions like the Constitutional Court. She contrasts this with the current autocratic shift under Orbán, driven by systematic legal and political changes. Strategies for Opposition and Civil Society Vejvoda inquires about effective strategies for opposition parties and civil society. Scheppele suggests mobilizing urban voters, protecting independent media, and promoting education to counteract autocratic trends. She emphasizes the importance of exposing and resisting clientelist policies used by autocrats to buy votes and maintain power. Economic Policies in Populist Strategies Vejvoda asks how economic policies play into the strategies of populist leaders like Orbán. Scheppele explains that populist leaders use targeted social programs to benefit their base while excluding marginalized groups. In Hungary, Orbán’s programs, such as tax credits for families, are designed to benefit middle-class Hungarians and exclude Roma families, ensuring loyalty from his supporters. The EU’s Response to Orbán’s Leadership and Hungary’s EU Presidency Vejvoda discusses the EU’s response to Orbán’s leadership, especially with Hungary’s upcoming EU presidency. Scheppele describes the EU’s challenges in dealing with Orbán, who leverages Hungary’s EU membership for financial gains while pursuing autocratic policies. She notes the potential risks and opportunities during Hungary’s EU presidency and the importance of the EU navigating this carefully to uphold democratic values. Implications for Upcoming Elections in France and the United States Vejvoda questions the implications of current trends for upcoming elections in France and the U.S. Scheppele highlights the challenges posed by populist and nationalist movements, emphasizing the fragility of democratic systems. She expresses concerns about the U.S. electoral system’s complexity and vulnerabilities, which could be exploited, posing a threat to democratic outcomes. She stresses the need for vigilance and robust democratic engagement to safeguard these elections. The Role of Media in Autocratic Strategies Vejvoda asks about the role of media in autocratic strategies. Scheppele discusses the importance of media control for autocrats, highlighting how Orbán has suppressed liberal media and promoted government-friendly outlets. This control influences public opinion and limits the opposition’s ability to communicate effectively with the public. Urban-Rural Divides in Political Affiliations Vejvoda inquires about the significance of urban-rural divides in the context of rising populism. Scheppele explains that urban areas tend to be more liberal and educated, while rural areas often support populist leaders. This divide is exploited by autocrats who implement policies favoring rural areas and suppress urban opposition through financial constraints and media control. She emphasizes the need for opposition strategies to address these divides effectively.

    47 phút
  7. 12 THG 6

    Episode 34: Populism and Political Disorder with Erik Jones

    In this episode of the Vienna Coffee House Conversations podcast, host Ivan Vejvoda speaks with Erik Jones, director of the Schuman Center for Advanced Studies at the European University Institute in Florence. Covering the rise of populism, nationalism, and identitarian politics in Europe and beyond, Jones argues that the current political disorder is neither new nor exceptional, drawing parallels to historical periods of economic success followed by political unrest. He emphasizes the significant role of rising inequality and economic uncertainty in driving people away from mainstream parties toward populist alternatives. Synopsis: Introduction: Ivan Vejvoda introduces Erik Jones, highlighting his expertise in European political economy and dynamics. Populism and Political Disorder: Analysis of the rise of populist, nationalist, and identitarian politics; historical parallels and contemporary drivers. Socioeconomic Determinants: Discussion on the impact of rising inequality, economic uncertainty, and technological advancements on political dynamics. Neoliberalism and Policy Limitations: Examination of the shift towards neoliberalism in the late 20th century and its consequences on current political structures. European Union Challenges: Insights into EU enlargement issues, democratic backsliding in Hungary and Poland, and the need for visionary leadership. Conclusion: Reflections on the future of Europe and the importance of sustaining democratic values and institutions.

    40 phút

Xếp Hạng & Nhận Xét

5
/5
3 Xếp hạng

Giới Thiệu

At this pivotal moment for Europe and the liberal democratic order, this podcast series from the Institute For Human Sciences explores the undercurrents, tensions and dilemmas that the continent is facing and will will face in the near term. In conversation with leading figures in the field, civil society pioneer Ivan Vejvoda is your guide to the diverse and complex preoccupations of an uncertain time.

Có Thể Bạn Cũng Thích

Bạn cần đăng nhập để nghe các tập có chứa nội dung thô tục.

Luôn cập nhật thông tin về chương trình này

Đăng nhập hoặc đăng ký để theo dõi các chương trình, lưu các tập và nhận những thông tin cập nhật mới nhất.

Chọn quốc gia hoặc vùng

Châu Phi, Trung Đông và Ấn Độ

Châu Á Thái Bình Dương

Châu Âu

Châu Mỹ Latinh và Caribê

Hoa Kỳ và Canada