24 min

How the Jabs Will Be Used to Control Those Who Haven't Already Been Depopulated Into the Grave The JD Rucker Show

    • News Commentary

Arguably the toughest part about my job is discernment. There are two massive challenges with this, especially as it pertains to controversial topics such as the Covid-19 "vaccines." First, there are the unambiguous and massive censorship and suppression campaigns being waged by governments, corporate media, Big Pharma, academia, Big Tech, and healthcare organizations to hide the damaging truths about the experimental jabs. Then, there is the flood of fake news and ludicrous theories surrounding the globalists' plans for the injections.

The first challenge is only massive because the players are massive. It's not very hard to see through the lies for those who have been thoroughly exposed to the truth, but for the blinded masses the lies are embedded in their psyches as truth, even when that so-called "truth" goes against what they're seeing around them. We've witnessed this on full display with the numerous celebrities and politicians who have announced in recent months that they have Covid-19. Invariably they've been vaxxed, boosted, and usually double-boosted. Invariably they thank the fact that they've been jabbed for their cases being relatively mild. What you don't hear about often are celebrities who are unvaccinated getting Covid. You'd hear it a lot more than you hear about the vaxxed getting Covid. Just ask Aaron Rodgers.

But even as people hear about all the vaxxed people getting infected, they still line up to get jab after jab after jab because that's the narrative being pushed in the mainstream. Recognizing it is easy for us. Overcoming it is the challenge.

The second difficulty with discernment is sifting through the flood of theories, accusations, and "bombshell" reports. Many of them are legitimate. Others are just fodder for clickbait and page views. It's not as easy as it once was to distinguish between the two because some of the most outrageous theories have been proven accurate, or at the very least likely. The notion that Covid jabs alter DNA is one of the "crazy" ideas that has been demonstrated by multiple studies over the last year or so, but it's a theory that still usually gets tossed in the bucket with other "fringe" concepts.

One theory that has been picking up steam in recent months qualifies as "fringe" and would probably be easy to ignore if not for the fact that it's almost certainly true. The theory is this: The Covid "vaccines" change the DNA of many if not most of its recipients and weakens the immune system, forcing those who have been jabbed to need more jabs in order for the bodies to continue to function properly. We've seen studies showing negative efficacy of the vaccines over time. They appear to offer some form of protection for a little while, but once that initial period ends months or even weeks later, the jabbed tend to be more vulnerable to Covid-19 as well as other diseases.

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky recently received her fifth jab, allegedly taking the new bivalent booster shot that our government is now pushing to the masses. I say "allegedly" because it's pretty clear the people who are aware of the globalist conspiracy would not allow themselves to be truly injected. One listener to my show emailed me to say we can tell who knew about the plan and who was just a useful idiot by testing them for spike proteins. It's probably true.

We've had Anthony Fauci call for yearly shots. We've had doctors and scientists, especially in the Middle East and Europe, saying the jabs need to be taken every three to six months. I've speculated that by 2024 they'll be announcing monthly jabs and possibly daily pills to supplement the "benefits." If the theory is correct that hijacking the DNA and weakening the immune system is happening with the jabs, we can assume that the more someone gets jabbed, the more likely they are to need more jabs in the future just to stay alive.

That, folks, is the ultimate...

Arguably the toughest part about my job is discernment. There are two massive challenges with this, especially as it pertains to controversial topics such as the Covid-19 "vaccines." First, there are the unambiguous and massive censorship and suppression campaigns being waged by governments, corporate media, Big Pharma, academia, Big Tech, and healthcare organizations to hide the damaging truths about the experimental jabs. Then, there is the flood of fake news and ludicrous theories surrounding the globalists' plans for the injections.

The first challenge is only massive because the players are massive. It's not very hard to see through the lies for those who have been thoroughly exposed to the truth, but for the blinded masses the lies are embedded in their psyches as truth, even when that so-called "truth" goes against what they're seeing around them. We've witnessed this on full display with the numerous celebrities and politicians who have announced in recent months that they have Covid-19. Invariably they've been vaxxed, boosted, and usually double-boosted. Invariably they thank the fact that they've been jabbed for their cases being relatively mild. What you don't hear about often are celebrities who are unvaccinated getting Covid. You'd hear it a lot more than you hear about the vaxxed getting Covid. Just ask Aaron Rodgers.

But even as people hear about all the vaxxed people getting infected, they still line up to get jab after jab after jab because that's the narrative being pushed in the mainstream. Recognizing it is easy for us. Overcoming it is the challenge.

The second difficulty with discernment is sifting through the flood of theories, accusations, and "bombshell" reports. Many of them are legitimate. Others are just fodder for clickbait and page views. It's not as easy as it once was to distinguish between the two because some of the most outrageous theories have been proven accurate, or at the very least likely. The notion that Covid jabs alter DNA is one of the "crazy" ideas that has been demonstrated by multiple studies over the last year or so, but it's a theory that still usually gets tossed in the bucket with other "fringe" concepts.

One theory that has been picking up steam in recent months qualifies as "fringe" and would probably be easy to ignore if not for the fact that it's almost certainly true. The theory is this: The Covid "vaccines" change the DNA of many if not most of its recipients and weakens the immune system, forcing those who have been jabbed to need more jabs in order for the bodies to continue to function properly. We've seen studies showing negative efficacy of the vaccines over time. They appear to offer some form of protection for a little while, but once that initial period ends months or even weeks later, the jabbed tend to be more vulnerable to Covid-19 as well as other diseases.

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky recently received her fifth jab, allegedly taking the new bivalent booster shot that our government is now pushing to the masses. I say "allegedly" because it's pretty clear the people who are aware of the globalist conspiracy would not allow themselves to be truly injected. One listener to my show emailed me to say we can tell who knew about the plan and who was just a useful idiot by testing them for spike proteins. It's probably true.

We've had Anthony Fauci call for yearly shots. We've had doctors and scientists, especially in the Middle East and Europe, saying the jabs need to be taken every three to six months. I've speculated that by 2024 they'll be announcing monthly jabs and possibly daily pills to supplement the "benefits." If the theory is correct that hijacking the DNA and weakening the immune system is happening with the jabs, we can assume that the more someone gets jabbed, the more likely they are to need more jabs in the future just to stay alive.

That, folks, is the ultimate...

24 min