886 episodes
JACC Specialty Journals American College of Cardiology
-
- Health & Fitness
-
-
3.7 • 18 Ratings
-
In this podcast series, editors-in-chief from the JACC family of specialty journals provide highlights and summarize key findings for select issues. Published by the American College of Cardiology, the JACC Journals publish peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, translational investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the art papers, and review articles. They are top ranked for impact factor and their manuscripts are among the most covered by media outlets, most talked about on social media, and most read online.
-
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology - QRS Morphology and the Risk of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients
Commentary by Dr. Emile Daoud
-
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology - Sex-Specific Outcomes of LBBAP Versus Biventricular Pacing: Results From I-CLAS
Commentary by Dr. Emile Daoud
-
JACC: Advances - Deep Learning to Estimate Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction From Routine Coronary Angiographic Images
Commentary by Dr. Sadeer Al-Kindi and Dr. Mohamad Alkhouli
-
JACC: Basic to Translational Science - Innovative Multi-Lumen Stent System for Pulmonary Flow Adjustment in Congenital Heart Disease and Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Commentary by Dr. Douglas Mann and Dr. Elena Amin and Mr. Seth Wagner
-
JACC: Advances - 30-Day Outcomes of Transcatheter Tricuspid Annuloplasty With the K-Clip System: A Single-Center, Observational Study
Commentary by Dr. Candice Silversides
-
JACC: Advances - Anatomical/Physiological Correlates of Functional Capacity in Adults With Repaired and Nonsevere Coarctation of the Aorta
Commentary by Dr. Candice Silversides
Customer Reviews
JACC specialty podcast
JACC specialty podcasts are getting more numerous and higher in quality. This requires a lot of work in time, so the efforts are commendable. Podcasts need to focus on objective evidence, and hyperbole and opinions should be minimized. Listeners want to have the evidence and the actual data, not broad subjective assessments of treatments and interventions.