10 episodes
Mad Dogs and Englishmen National Review
-
- Politics
-
-
4.8 • 1.5K Ratings
-
National Review's Charles C.W. Cooke and Kevin D. Williamson discuss whatever they feel like discussing this week.
The most recent ten episodes of this podcast are available on this feed. Full archives are available to NRPLUS subscribers at NationalReview.com.
-
If You Take Your Dog to the Dentist . . .
. . . it’ll cost you two arms and a leg. Kevin and Charlie discuss this, General Austin’s confirmation chances, war heroes, and much more.
-
‘Truly Reprehensible’
Kevin and Charlie discuss Kevin’s new book, Paul Krugman, and Thanksgiving.
-
The Front Porch Podcast
Kevin and Charlie discuss global warming, Kevin's new book, middle names, and much more.
-
Some Suggestions for Biden
Kevin and Charlie discuss their views on eccentrics and urge Joe Biden to go out in a blaze of glory.
-
'Hey, You, I Want You to Vote for Me'
Kevin and Charlie discuss the libertarian wins of this election cycle, give suggestions for how future presidential candidates should campaign, and engage in a little 2024 predicting.
-
We're Getting Old
Kevin and Charlie discuss car racing, state topography, and anything else to avoid talking about the looming 2020 election.
Customer Reviews
How to pronounce "Xavier Becerra”
Say: “Hov-ee-err Bess-erruh”
Otherwise, these guys are great.
What are we going talk about?
You guys are too much. What did you want to talk about Charlie? Uh... I don’t remember.
I love it when bright people look dumb.
“Truly Reprehensible”
The crackpot who thought vitamin C was a panacea was Linus Pauling. The work that won him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry involved the structure of complex molecules, and laid the groundwork for Watson and Crick’s discovery of the double helix of DNA. He had no evidence for his theories of the actions of vitamin C (acetic acid) in the body; perhaps it was too simple a molecule to interest him very long. This was more of a mystical belief, or pure delusion, unusual but not unprecedented in great scientists and mathematicians (John Nash and Sir Isaac Newton come to mind). In Krugman’s case, left-wing orthodoxy would be the belief. Unlike Krugman’s work in economics, it is unfalsifiable.
Another great podcast!
Will Anderson
Richmond, VA