Nature and the Nation Dylan John
-
- Arts
-
Nature and the Nation explores politics, philosophy, psychology, sociology and economics from a naturalistic, paleoconservative perspective, using the format of a book review. I examine books published in a wide array of time periods, with a special emphasis on the early to middle 20th century, the ancient Greeks, and of course the present.
-
Review: The True Believer by Eric Hoffer
In this episode, I explore Eric Hoffer's description of the various types of people that constitute the leaders and followers of mass movements, as described in his classic 1951 book, The True Believer.
-
Review: The Sophists by W. K. C. Guthrie
In this episode I examine the competing forces of Physis (Nature) and Nomos (Custom) as detailed in the erudite examination The Sophists by W. K. C. Guthrie.
-
Review: From Religion to Philosophy by F. M. Cornford
In this episode I examine the connections between Nomos, Physis, and Moira in early Greek philosophy as detailed by Cornford in From Religion to Philosophy.
-
Review: The Iliad by Homer
In this episode I look at the violent glory of war in Homer's Iliad, as detailed in Bernard Knox's introduction to the Robert Fagles translation of this classic epic poem of war, and several choice readings of the battle for the Argive ships.
-
Review: Sailing the Wine Dark Sea by Thomas Cahill
In this episode I look at Thomas Cahill's examination of Ancient Greece in Sailing the Wine Dark Sea: Why the Greeks Matter. I pay special attention to the first three chapter where Cahill discusses Homer and his great works, The Iliad and the Odessey.
-
Review: History of Political Philosophy (Hume) edited by Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey
In this episode I explore another essay in Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey's massive History of Political Philosophy 3rd Edition. This time it's David Hume and his so-called skepticism, which I call into question on account of his deference to habit and custom. This episode is the fourth of a series.
Customer Reviews
Great podcast
Great reviews of books on philosophy and political theory.
Good
I like this podcast. The host and I share lots of the same thoughts but he is way more articulate than I am. This helps me organize my own thinking and see where some of my blind spots are. I am surprised at the low number of reviews. But I suppose that since this is a higher level podcast, it will never be popular with the masses. I want to leave this post here to encourage the host to keep going with the podcast because he is doing good work.
Revolt against the modern world
Very poor understanding of Evola based on a American Christian background.