27 min

Immigration update podcast, episode 63 Free Movement

    • Government

Welcome to the March 2019 edition of the Free Movement immigration update podcast. This month we start with a couple of High Court victories by NGOs before turning to some significant developments in business immigration. There’s also been some movement in asylum law which we’ll review before looking at some new cases concerning appeal rights and children. We finish on developments in the wonderful world of immigration detention, including the damning Home Affairs committee report castigating the whole business.







If you would like to claim CPD points for reading the material and listening to this podcast, sign up here as a Free Movement member. There are now over 100 CPD hours of training materials available to members. You can find all the available courses here.







If you listen to podcasts on your mobile phone, you can subscribe for free via iTunes here, Stitcher here or point your podcast player to the podcast feed for Free Movement. Using a mobile device and subscribing has the advantage that each new podcast can be automatically downloaded for listening to on the go.







To access previous Free Movement immigration update podcasts click here.







The downloadable 25-minute audio podcast follows the running order below:







Right to Rent







High Court finds Right to Rent checks discriminatory in landmark judgment







Removal windows







Judge suspends Home Office removal window policy







Business immigration







New innovator and start-up visas launch today — but is anybody ready?







Home Office changes tack on “professional sportsperson” definition 







Asylum







Supreme Court has to remind tribunal self inflicted torture inherently unlikely







a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Court of Appeal corrects country guidance on Ahmadis from Pakistan (opens in a new tab)" href="https://freemovement.org.

Welcome to the March 2019 edition of the Free Movement immigration update podcast. This month we start with a couple of High Court victories by NGOs before turning to some significant developments in business immigration. There’s also been some movement in asylum law which we’ll review before looking at some new cases concerning appeal rights and children. We finish on developments in the wonderful world of immigration detention, including the damning Home Affairs committee report castigating the whole business.







If you would like to claim CPD points for reading the material and listening to this podcast, sign up here as a Free Movement member. There are now over 100 CPD hours of training materials available to members. You can find all the available courses here.







If you listen to podcasts on your mobile phone, you can subscribe for free via iTunes here, Stitcher here or point your podcast player to the podcast feed for Free Movement. Using a mobile device and subscribing has the advantage that each new podcast can be automatically downloaded for listening to on the go.







To access previous Free Movement immigration update podcasts click here.







The downloadable 25-minute audio podcast follows the running order below:







Right to Rent







High Court finds Right to Rent checks discriminatory in landmark judgment







Removal windows







Judge suspends Home Office removal window policy







Business immigration







New innovator and start-up visas launch today — but is anybody ready?







Home Office changes tack on “professional sportsperson” definition 







Asylum







Supreme Court has to remind tribunal self inflicted torture inherently unlikely







a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Court of Appeal corrects country guidance on Ahmadis from Pakistan (opens in a new tab)" href="https://freemovement.org.

27 min

Top Podcasts In Government

Strict Scrutiny
Crooked Media
The Lawfare Podcast
The Lawfare Institute
5-4
Prologue Projects
Future Hindsight
Future Hindsight
The Chris Plante Show
WMAL | Cumulus Podcast Network | Cumulus Media Washington
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Oyez