Subtext: Conversations about Classic Books and Films

Early, ad-free, and bonus content.
$4.99/mo or $49.99/yr after trial
Subtext is a book club podcast for readers interested in what the greatest works of the human imagination say about life’s big questions. Each episode, philosopher Wes Alwan and poet Erin O’Luanaigh conduct a close reading of a text or film and co-write an audio essay about it in real time. It’s literary analysis, but in the best sense: we try not overly stuffy and pedantic, but rather focus on unearthing what’s most compelling about great books and movies, and how it is they can touch our lives in such a significant way.
Love this show!
May 22
Best subtextual analysis out there…
Question on Emily Dickinson
May 10
Hey guys! Love the show. I had a question about the Emily Dickinson episode on “I felt a funeral in my brain.” Do you think there’s any possibility Ambrose Bierce read the poem and incorporated its insights into dying into “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge”?
When my mind is turned on I very much enjoy the podcast
12/16/2024
They do their homework and are thoughtful and I enjoy hearing the way they interpret things.
Excellent podcast for any (non-Californian) book or movie lover
Jan 24
I was excited to discover this podcast so I was let down when I listened to the Die Hard episode and learned what the hosts think of Californians (41:07 - 43:30). The conversation purports to be about negative stereotypes of California but is really an argument for negative stereotypes of California. “What is it about California that is so objectionable to the New Yorker?” the hosts ask, and proceed to answer. Californians are weird, flaky, impractical, lacking in values, lacking in grit. New York, by contrast, is where “real life” takes place and where “real people” live. Why is there this sharp difference? It’s simple: weather. New Yorkers cope with brutal, yet infinitely edifying, winters while Californians presumably bask under a perma-sun, unaware of what a real life looks like. I didn’t know there was THAT much virtue in shoveling snow. I’m imagining what my fellow Californians’ reactions would be if I announced they don’t “contend” with anything, or that they don’t “contend” with enough, anyway, to pass muster. Taking a characteristic of your own area, such as cold weather, and applying it as a litmus test on the rest of the world is parochial. Ruling out the sunny spots of the globe as head-scratchingly unreal shrinks it down to an absurd extent. If the hosts insist on using their podcast to call out a state for what they view as its deficiencies, perhaps they could make more sense when they do so.
About
Information
- CreatorWes Alwan and Erin O'Luanaigh
- Years Active2020 - 2025
- Episodes184
- RatingClean
- CopyrightCopyright © 2020-2024 | (sub)Text | All Rights Reserved
- Show Website
- ProviderClarence Alwan
You Might Also Like
- PhilosophyUpdated Weekly
- BooksUpdated Semiweekly
- PhilosophyUpdated Weekly
- TV & FilmUpdated Bimonthly
- PhilosophyUpdated Weekly
- HistoryUpdated Monthly
- ArtsUpdated Biweekly