200 episodes

Decisions of the Supreme Court, summarized by the court itself.Readings of the Supreme Court slip opinion syllabi, With no personal commentary, you can make up your own mind about the decisions. See Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly

Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS) RJ Dieken

    • Government
    • 4.3, 25 Ratings

Decisions of the Supreme Court, summarized by the court itself.Readings of the Supreme Court slip opinion syllabi, With no personal commentary, you can make up your own mind about the decisions. See Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly

    PTO v Booking.com

    PTO v Booking.com

    Booking.com is not a generic name.

    • 5 min
    ESPINOZA v. MONTANA DEPT. OF REVENUE (Freedom of religion)

    ESPINOZA v. MONTANA DEPT. OF REVENUE (Freedom of religion)

    Can’t discriminate solely on the basis of religious affiliation (distinguishing religious conduct as different).

    • 6 min
    AGENCY FOR INT’L DEVELOPMENT v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INT’L

    AGENCY FOR INT’L DEVELOPMENT v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INT’L

    First Amendment argument fails.

    • 4 min
    SEILA LAW LLC v. CFPB

    SEILA LAW LLC v. CFPB

    The appointment and removal provisions for the director of the CFPB is unconstitutional, but this stuff is severable from the dodd frank act. 

    • 13 min
    JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES v. RUSSO (Abortion)

    JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES v. RUSSO (Abortion)

    A Louisiana law requiring admitting privileges at nearby hospitals for abortion doctors is unconstitutional.

    • 11 min
    DHS v. THURAISSIGIAM

    DHS v. THURAISSIGIAM

    Habius is not useful in requesting asylum determination review, just for release from custody.

    • 8 min

Customer Reviews

4.3 out of 5
25 Ratings

25 Ratings

JR7777777788 ,

The perfect way to listen to SCOTUS decisions

The podcaster has a clear and soothing voice. Cases are read in a professional and impartial manner. There is no speculation nor drama, just the facts.

LLFauntleroy ,

So Convenient!

I love being spoon fed the law by an uterly impartial voice.

Samanthatwiggy ,

Very interesting

Great content for those who love the law!

Top Podcasts In Government

Listeners Also Subscribed To