The Nuclear Reactor Next Door Series

Roger Rapoport
The Nuclear Reactor Next Door Series

“The clean nuclear power argument from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy, is nonsense,” says Stanford University Climate Expert Dr. Mark Jacobsen. Why are the federal and state officials wasting over $8 billion in taxpayer funds for the first ever restart of a dangerous nuclear reactor in Michigan; sold for scrap by its previous owner?”

Episodes

  1. Episode 10: "It's like driving a Ferrari with a learners permit – in a snowstorm!" – Palisades Update from Nuclear Expert Alan Blind

    APR 22

    Episode 10: "It's like driving a Ferrari with a learners permit – in a snowstorm!" – Palisades Update from Nuclear Expert Alan Blind

    Alan Blind, one of the nation's foremost nuclear power experts and former design engineer at Palisades Nuclear Generating Station, is back with breaking news and updates regarding the controversial restart of the Palisades facility on the shores of Lake Michigan. Blind's career spanned over 40 years operating nuclear plants, including Palisades.  In the latest podcast, Blind who is a proponent of nuclear power, details concerns and the potential for critical failure modes regarding what's going on at Palisades right now. "It's like driving a Ferrari with a learners permit ... in a snowstorm". Alan is interviewed by Journalist Roger Rapoport, producer of The Nuclear Reactor Next Door podcast series. You will hear details, on direct, that there has "never been a restart of a (retired) nuclear reactor like this", the massive costs and risk to public dollars to do so, the reality of plugged steam generator tubes, inferior materials used at time of construction and most concerning to everyone especially political decision makers – the lack of regulatory oversight regarding process objectives with an uncertain outcome.  Moreover, the company entrusted to do the work was given a huge contract fueled by public dollars with the assumption they could perform, has no previous experience necessary to do this level of complex and exacting work. At the beginning of the 10th episode in the Nuclear Reactor Nextdoor podcast series, Alan details how he got into the nuclear power industry; his outstanding education at Purdue University, career highlights overseeing operations of nuclear power plants including his background as a start-up engineer in the mid 1970s of the (then) new DC Cook plant in Bridgman, Michigan. His career at the  Cook facility spanned 21 years where he also worked in operations, maintenance, and became the site vice president. In 1998, Blind moved on to the Consolidated Edison, Indian Point Plant in New York, very close to NYC. Indian Point was ordered to shut down by NRC for a variety of reasons that included safety and evacuation protocols in the densely populated area and discharge into Hudson River. Blind also shares his work in Canada renewing an older reactor. Alan discusses his early retirement and decision to go back to work at Palisades as Engineering Director. During this conversation with Rapoport, he details the history and operations of the Palisades Plant as well as insights impacting this lovely, quiet  beachfront community on the shores of Lake Michigan, next to a nuclear power reactor. Nevertheless, Alan Blind also makes clear what motivated him to express concerns (avoiding speculation, based on facts, direct experience and  expertise and always providing recommendations and solutions) and why the industry, regulatory and political officials need to slow down the process, make certain regulatory professionals are involved, focus on new technology – not bandaid decades old, used reactor components and certainly most critical; how to contain and manage spent nuclear fuel. And that officials and decision makers respect the public dollars being spent on this and other proposed projects.  When asked "Alan, what would you say to Gretchen Whitmere if you met her in an airport?" ... "I'd say Governor, thank-you for supporting nuclear power but you chose wrong project to try and restart!" He and Rapoport are available for interviews, radio or television news shows, print media and are comfortable with meeting with elected and appointed officials.  Enjoy Episode 10 and share with friends.

    1h 28m
  2. Why $16 per watt Nuclear Power Can’t Compete With $1 per watt Carbon Free Wind and Solar. Conversation with Mark Z. Jacobson, PhD, Stanford University

    05/13/2024

    Why $16 per watt Nuclear Power Can’t Compete With $1 per watt Carbon Free Wind and Solar. Conversation with Mark Z. Jacobson, PhD, Stanford University

    Stanford professor of civil and environmental engineering professor of civil and environmental energy Mark Jacobson directs the university’s Atmosphere/Energy Program. He says  the cost of nuclear power from America’s two most recently opened plants in Georgia is $16 per watt. “That does not compare favorably with onshore wind and solar which can be as low as $1 per watt." One of the world’s leading climate experts, Dr. Jacobson does not see a future for nuclear power. He points out that  nuclear power plants can take nine to 15 years for construction, and 17 to 22 years overall from planning to operation in the U.S. and Europe, and 12 to 22 years worldwide. Georgia’s new Vogtle plants were finished seven years late and $17 billion over budget. New wind and solar facilities take one to three years to complete. "The clean nuclear power argument from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy is nonsense,” says Jacobson. “Mined uranium does not show up in perfect form. It must be refined, which takes a lot of energy and causes pollution. Nuclear reactors are belching huge amounts of water vapor and heat, contributing to local and global warming. Evaporated water from the giant steam generators is a greenhouse gas." “New nuclear power plants cost 2.3 to 7.4 times those of onshore wind or utility solar PV per watt, take five to 17 years longer between planning and operation, and produce nine to 37 times the emissions per watt as wind.” Get his book: No Miracles Needed – How Today's Technology Can Save Our Climate and Clean Our Air  https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/WWSNoMN/NoMiracles.html                                                                                                         MORE:Mark Z. Jacobson’s career has focused on better understanding air pollution and climate problems and developing large-scale clean, renewable energy solutions to them. Toward that end, he has developed and applied three-dimensional (3-D) atmosphere-biosphere-ocean computer models and solvers to simulate and understand air pollution, weather, climate, and renewable energy systems. He has also developed roadmaps to transition countries, states, cities, and towns to 100% clean, renewable energy for all purposes and computer models to examine grid stability in the presence of 100% renewable energy. Jacobson has been a professor at Stanford University since 1994. His research crosses two fields: Atmospheric Sciences and Energy. To date, he has published 185 peer-reviewed journal articles and given ~750 invited talks. In 2004, he founded and has ever since directed the Atmosphere/Energy Program at Stanford. Jacobson has published seven books, including Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling (1999) and Atmospheric Pollution: History, Science, and Regulation (2002). These two books, plus second editions in 2005 and 2012, respectively, relate primarily to his work in Atmospheric Sciences. The last three, 100% Clean, Renewable Energy and Storage for Everything (2020), No Miracles Needed (2023), and Still No Miracles Needed (2025), relate to his work in Energy.                                                                                                          ###

    1h 13m

Ratings & Reviews

4.1
out of 5
9 Ratings

About

“The clean nuclear power argument from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy, is nonsense,” says Stanford University Climate Expert Dr. Mark Jacobsen. Why are the federal and state officials wasting over $8 billion in taxpayer funds for the first ever restart of a dangerous nuclear reactor in Michigan; sold for scrap by its previous owner?”

You Might Also Like

To listen to explicit episodes, sign in.

Stay up to date with this show

Sign in or sign up to follow shows, save episodes, and get the latest updates.

Select a country or region

Africa, Middle East, and India

Asia Pacific

Europe

Latin America and the Caribbean

The United States and Canada