Trade Secret Law Evolution Podcast Greenberg Traurig

In this episode, GT litigator Jonathan Widjaja joins Jordan for a deep dive into how courts reconcile general agency principles with statutory requirements for indirect misappropriation, that is, liability for misappropriation based on the conduct of another. Jon also shares an interesting “fun fact.”

In this episode, Los Angeles Shareholder Blakeley Oranburg and Jordan discuss an Eight Circuit case that addresses pleading trade secret misappropriation claims on “information and belief,” and case out of the Southern District of Ohio that explains the time period in which damages for trade secret misappropriation are recoverable.

In this episode, Boston shareholder Greg Bombard returns to discuss GT’s 2022 trade secret Year in Review, and some highlights from last year’s cases.

In this episode, Jordan and fellow IP litigator Layal Bishara discuss the Sixth Circuit’s deep dive into identification of combination trade secrets, proper measures of damages, and what it means to willfully misappropriate. 

In this episode, Bina Palnitkar and Jordan Grotzinger discuss the Northern District of Illinois’ deep dive into what it takes to properly plead misappropriation and inevitable disclosure, and address the preemption doctrine.  They’re also joined by GT’s very own Brian Duffy, the firm’s CEO, who invented the “interesting fact” segment of the podcast and shares his own interesting fact.

In this episode, Jordan and Boston Shareholder Greg Bombard discuss the Seventh Circuit’s recent opinion in a case involving hydraulic actuator technology.  The Court of Appeal addressed the critical issue of trade secret identification and analyzed whether the proof of misappropriation in this case was sufficient to survive summary judgment.