25 episodes

This is The Google on Trial Podcast. ,Thank you for listening and make sure you subscribe to never miss a court room detail. The first day of the United States v. Google trial took place on Tuesday, September 12, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The trial is expected to last for 10 weeks.The Justice Department's case against Google alleges that the company has violated antitrust law by maintaining its monopoly power in the online search market. The government claims that Google has done this through a variety of anticompetitive practices, including:
Striking exclusive deals with Apple and other companies to make Google the default search engine on their devices.Paying billions of dollars to phone makers and other companies to pre-install its search app on their devices.Using its power in the search market to give its own products and services an unfair advantage over rivals.Google has denied all of the government's allegations. The company's lawyers argue that its search engine is the best in the world and that its market dominance is the result of competition, not anticompetitive conduct.The first day of the trial focused on opening statements from the two sides. The Justice Department's opening statement was delivered by Kenneth Dintzer, a deputy branch director at the department's Antitrust Division. Dintzer argued that Google has "usurped control" of the online search market and that its anticompetitive practices have harmed consumers and businesses.Google's opening statement was delivered by Kent Walker, the company's senior vice president for global affairs. Walker argued that Google's search engine is "the most innovative and popular search engine in the world" and that its market dominance is the result of consumer choice, not anticompetitive conduct.The trial is expected to be closely watched by the tech industry and antitrust experts. The outcome of the trial could have a major impact on Google's business and the future of the online search market.Here are some additional details from the first day of the trial:
The Justice Department called two witnesses to testify: Michael Katz, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, and Christopher Yoo, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania. Katz testified about the economics of antitrust law, while Yoo testified about the history of antitrust law in the tech industry.Google called one witness to testify: Richard Whitt, a former Google executive who is now a professor at the University of California, Davis. Whitt testified about Google's search engine and its competitive landscape.The judge in the case, Amit Mehta, issued a number of rulings on motions filed by the two sides. He ruled that the Justice Department could introduce evidence of Google's conduct in other markets, such as its advertising business. He also ruled that Google could introduce evidence of the benefits of its search engine.The trial is expected to continue for the next 10 weeks. The government is expected to call a number of witnesses, including current and former Google employees, economists, and antitrust experts. Google is expected to call a number of witnesses as well, including its own employees, economists, and antitrust experts.The outcome of the trial is uncertain. The Justice Department has a strong case, but Google has a number of experienced lawyers who will be defending the company. The judge in the case, Amit Mehta, is also a respected jurist who is known for his fair and impartial rulings.The trial is a major test for Google and for the Biden administration's antitrust agenda. If the Justice Department is successful, it could force Google to change its business practices and open up the online search market to more competition.Thank you for listening to the United States v. Google Trial Podcast. Your daily podcast for all things in the Government versus Google.
If you like what you hear, please subscribe. Thanks for listening The Googl

Google on Trial - The US vs Google Quiet. Please

    • News

This is The Google on Trial Podcast. ,Thank you for listening and make sure you subscribe to never miss a court room detail. The first day of the United States v. Google trial took place on Tuesday, September 12, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The trial is expected to last for 10 weeks.The Justice Department's case against Google alleges that the company has violated antitrust law by maintaining its monopoly power in the online search market. The government claims that Google has done this through a variety of anticompetitive practices, including:
Striking exclusive deals with Apple and other companies to make Google the default search engine on their devices.Paying billions of dollars to phone makers and other companies to pre-install its search app on their devices.Using its power in the search market to give its own products and services an unfair advantage over rivals.Google has denied all of the government's allegations. The company's lawyers argue that its search engine is the best in the world and that its market dominance is the result of competition, not anticompetitive conduct.The first day of the trial focused on opening statements from the two sides. The Justice Department's opening statement was delivered by Kenneth Dintzer, a deputy branch director at the department's Antitrust Division. Dintzer argued that Google has "usurped control" of the online search market and that its anticompetitive practices have harmed consumers and businesses.Google's opening statement was delivered by Kent Walker, the company's senior vice president for global affairs. Walker argued that Google's search engine is "the most innovative and popular search engine in the world" and that its market dominance is the result of consumer choice, not anticompetitive conduct.The trial is expected to be closely watched by the tech industry and antitrust experts. The outcome of the trial could have a major impact on Google's business and the future of the online search market.Here are some additional details from the first day of the trial:
The Justice Department called two witnesses to testify: Michael Katz, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, and Christopher Yoo, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania. Katz testified about the economics of antitrust law, while Yoo testified about the history of antitrust law in the tech industry.Google called one witness to testify: Richard Whitt, a former Google executive who is now a professor at the University of California, Davis. Whitt testified about Google's search engine and its competitive landscape.The judge in the case, Amit Mehta, issued a number of rulings on motions filed by the two sides. He ruled that the Justice Department could introduce evidence of Google's conduct in other markets, such as its advertising business. He also ruled that Google could introduce evidence of the benefits of its search engine.The trial is expected to continue for the next 10 weeks. The government is expected to call a number of witnesses, including current and former Google employees, economists, and antitrust experts. Google is expected to call a number of witnesses as well, including its own employees, economists, and antitrust experts.The outcome of the trial is uncertain. The Justice Department has a strong case, but Google has a number of experienced lawyers who will be defending the company. The judge in the case, Amit Mehta, is also a respected jurist who is known for his fair and impartial rulings.The trial is a major test for Google and for the Biden administration's antitrust agenda. If the Justice Department is successful, it could force Google to change its business practices and open up the online search market to more competition.Thank you for listening to the United States v. Google Trial Podcast. Your daily podcast for all things in the Government versus Google.
If you like what you hear, please subscribe. Thanks for listening The Googl

    Google and Apple under DOJ microscope

    Google and Apple under DOJ microscope

    • 2 min
    Google on trial news update for 11-01-2023

    Google on trial news update for 11-01-2023

    This is your Google on trial podcast and this is the news for 11-01-2023.
    On October 31, 2023, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion to compel Google to produce certain documents and testimony that the company has been resisting. The DOJ argued that these materials are necessary to prove its case that Google has abused its dominance in the online search and advertising markets. Google has opposed the motion, arguing that the DOJ is seeking irrelevant and confidential information.
    In a separate development, on November 1, 2023, the judge overseeing the case issued a ruling on Google's motion to dismiss the DOJ's antitrust lawsuit. The judge denied the motion, ruling that the DOJ has adequately alleged that Google has violated antitrust laws. This is a major victory for the DOJ, and it means that the case will proceed to trial.
    The trial is scheduled to begin on September 12, 2024. It is expected to last several months, and it could have a significant impact on Google and the entire online technology industry.
    Here is a more detailed summary of the recent news and developments in the case:
    October 31, 2023: DOJ files motion to compel Google to produce documents and testimony
    The DOJ argued that the following materials are necessary to prove its case that Google has abused its dominance in the online search and advertising markets:
    Communications between Google executives about its search and advertising businesses
    Data on Google's search and advertising traffic
    Information about Google's internal decision-making process
    Google has opposed the motion, arguing that the DOJ is seeking irrelevant and confidential information. The company has also argued that the DOJ is seeking to delay the trial.
    November 1, 2023: Judge denies Google's motion to dismiss DOJ's antitrust lawsuit
    The judge overseeing the case issued a ruling on Google's motion to dismiss the DOJ's antitrust lawsuit. The judge denied the motion, ruling that the DOJ has adequately alleged that Google has violated antitrust laws.
    The judge found that the DOJ has alleged that Google has abused its dominance in the online search and advertising markets in a number of ways, including:
    Giving preferential treatment to its own products and services in its search results
    Making it difficult for rivals to compete in the online advertising market
    Acquiring competing companies in order to eliminate them as rivals
    The judge's ruling is a major victory for the DOJ, and it means that the case will proceed to trial.
    What to expect next:
    The trial is scheduled to begin on September 12, 2024. It is expected to last several months, and it could have a significant impact on Google and the entire online technology industry.
    If the DOJ is successful in its case, Google could be ordered to change its business practices or even break up the company. This would have a major impact on the way that people use the internet and the way that businesses advertise online.
    The trial is also being closely watched by other antitrust regulators around the world. If the DOJ is successful, it could embolden other regulators to take action against Google and other big tech companies.
    Thank you for listening and make sure you check out the SBF on Trial podcast for all your Sam Bankman Fried news and updates.

    • 3 min
    Google on Trial news for 10-27-2023

    Google on Trial news for 10-27-2023

    This is your Google on trial update for Friday october 27th.
    There have been no significant developments in the Google versus United States trial in the past 72 hours. The trial is currently in a recess, and is scheduled to resume on November 8, 2023.
    The trial began on October 24, 2023, and is expected to last for several weeks. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is alleging that Google has abused its dominance in the online search and advertising markets. Google has denied the allegations.
    The outcome of the trial could have significant implications for Google and the tech industry as a whole. If the DOJ wins, Google could be forced to make changes to its business practices, or even be broken up.
    Here is a summary of the key events that have taken place in the trial so far:
    Opening statements: In their opening statements, the DOJ and Google laid out their respective cases. The DOJ argued that Google is a monopoly that has abused its power to stifle competition and innovation. Google argued that it is a competitive company that has innovated and benefited consumers.
    Witness testimony: The trial has featured testimony from a variety of witnesses, including Google executives, economists, and industry experts. The DOJ's witnesses have testified that Google has used its dominance to harm consumers and competitors. Google's witnesses have testified that the company has operated fairly and that its dominance is due to its superior products and services.
    Expert testimony: The trial has also featured testimony from expert witnesses, who have testified on a variety of topics, including the antitrust laws, the economics of the online search and advertising markets, and Google's business practices.
    The trial is currently in a recess, and is scheduled to resume on November 8, 2023. At that time, the parties will present their closing arguments, and the judge will begin to consider the evidence before issuing a ruling.
    The outcome of the trial is uncertain. However, the case has the potential to have a significant impact on Google and the tech industry as a whole.
    Thank you for listening and be sure to subscribe so when the Trial resumes you are in the know.
    And if you like this check out the Trump on trial podcat or the SBF on Trial podcast.
    Have a great weekend!

    • 2 min
    Google on Trial news update for 10-16-2023

    Google on Trial news update for 10-16-2023

    Good morning, this is your Google Trial news update. The spotlight remains on the biggest U.S. antitrust trial in a quarter century, as the government continues its case against tech giant Google. As the trial approaches its midway point, there's much at stake for both the tech industry and consumers. Here are the latest developments:
    In the courtroom, scrutiny intensifies around Google's business practices. The Justice Department is aiming to crack down on what they argue is an illegal monopoly in the search engine market. A key focal point of the trial has been Google's hefty payments for premium search placement, particularly an estimated $15 to $20 billion annually to Apple alone, to remain the default search engine on various devices. This practice, critics say, stifles competition and keeps Google at the top of the search game.
    Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella recently testified, expressing concerns over Google's dominant hold on users. Nadella likened daily Google use to a routine as ingrained as brushing one's teeth in the morning. The ripple effects of this case could be profound. If the court sides with the Justice Department, we could see a seismic shift in online search practices. Experts anticipate that a ruling against Google may usher in greater competitive pressure from startups and third-party competitors, potentially leading to a more diversified and higher quality range of online services.
    Looking ahead, the trial's outcome could fundamentally alter how consumers interact with online search, and redefine how tech behemoths operate in a fiercely competitive digital realm. As the legal wheels continue to turn, the tech world watches with bated breath.
    That's the latest on the Google antitrust saga. We'll keep you updated as more details emerge.

    • 1 min
    Google on Trial - Courtroom drama heats up

    Google on Trial - Courtroom drama heats up

    This is the United States versus Google trial podcast and here is your update for 10-12-2023.
    As the tech community keenly follows the unfolding drama in the courtroom, the Google antitrust trial showcases a theatre where billions of dollars and the future of online dominion are at stake. The past days have seen high-stakes testimonies and revelations that could ripple through Silicon Valley and beyond.
    On October 11, Google's CEO, Sundar Pichai, stepped into the spotlight, defending the tech behemoth's business ethos as pro-competitive. Amid a courtroom filled with code and algorithm discussions, Pichai articulated that the Mountain View giant faces staunch competition from tech adversaries like Amazon and Microsoft, a narrative aimed at debunking the monopoly accusations.
    Following Pichai's testimony, October 12 brought to the fore a top executive from Google, shedding light on the financial tether binding Apple and Google. The testimony revealed a multi-billion dollar pact to nestle Google as the default search engine on Apple's myriad devices. The executive underscored the essence of this deal as a conduit to avail Google's search engine to the Apple user base, painting a picture of a tech landscape where alliances are crucial for user reach.
    As the courtroom drama seeped into October 13, a former Google employee was beckoned by the DOJ to unveil the internal cogwheels of Google's decision-making process. The testimony unearthed an awareness among Google's executive echelon regarding the potentially anticompetitive nature of their business practices, yet a deliberate choice to march along that path. This revelation peels another layer, exposing the cutthroat nature of maintaining a tech stronghold.
    With the trial's pendulum still in swing, the outcomes remain shrouded in legal fog. However, the snippets of testimonies from Google's C-suite and former employees have chiseled out insights into the search giant’s business tapestry and the internal mechanics driving their market strategies.
    The ramifications of this legal odyssey could morph the tech landscape significantly. A DOJ triumph could saddle Google with a mandate to overhaul its business practices and potentially cough up billions in fines. This courtroom saga, far from just a legal skirmish, could unfurl a new era of competition in the online search and ad markets, and potentially lower the drawbridge for other tech knights seeking to innovate and claim their stake in the digital realm.
    As the trial navigates through complex legal and tech terrains, its repercussions could echo through the silicon corridors, redefining market dynamics and perhaps, the ethos guiding tech giants in their quest for digital dominion.
    Thank you for listening and make sure you check out the SBF on Trial podcast covering the Sam Bankman Freed saga.

    • 3 min
    Google on Trial for 10-11-2023

    Google on Trial for 10-11-2023

    The Google antitrust trial continued on Wednesday, October 11, 2023, with the Justice Department presenting evidence that Google used its dominance in the search engine market to stifle competition.
    Here is the News from the Past 24 Hours
    The Justice Department called witnesses from Google's rivals, including Microsoft and DuckDuckGo. The witnesses testified that Google's practices made it difficult for them to compete.
    Microsoft's witness, CVP of Search and AI Jordi Ribas, testified that Google's dominance in the search engine market has led to higher prices for advertisers and lower quality results for users.
    DuckDuckGo's CEO, Gabriel Weinberg, testified that Google's anti-competitive practices have made it difficult for DuckDuckGo to grow its market share.
    Google's defense team has argued that the company's dominance in the search engine market is due to the superiority of its product. They have also argued that Google's practices are pro-competitive and benefit consumers.
    The trial is expected to continue for several more weeks. It is unclear when the judge will issue a ruling. However, the Justice Department's case appears to be strong, and it is possible that Google could be found guilty of antitrust violations.

    The outcome of the Google antitrust trial could have a significant impact on the company and the technology industry as a whole. If Google is found guilty, the judge could order the company to change its practices or even break it up. This could lead to more competition in the search engine market and other areas of the technology industry.
    The trial is also being closely watched by other tech giants, such as Amazon and Apple. If Google is found guilty, it could set a precedent for antitrust cases against other tech companies.

    • 1 min

Top Podcasts In News

Do We Know Them?
Do We Know Them?
Global News Podcast
BBC World Service
NBC Meet the Press
NBC News
PwC's accounting podcast
PwC
The Intelligence from The Economist
The Economist
Up First
NPR