Born To Watch - A Movie Podcast Matthew White

"Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back," directed by Irvin Kershner and released in 1980, stands not only as one of the most iconic sequels in cinema history but also as a pivotal turning point in the expansive Star Wars saga. As we gear up for Star Wars Day 2024, a retrospective glance at this masterpiece reveals its undiminished power to captivate and provoke thought, making it an enduring treasure in the sci-fi genre.
Cinematography and Visual Innovation
From Hoth's chilling winds to Dagobah's lush swamps, each frame of "The Empire Strikes Back" is a visual feast. The opening battle on the icy planet of Hoth remains one of the most visually spectacular sequences in the Star Wars series. Cinematographer Peter Suschitzky's expertise brought a deeper, grittier tone to the film, setting it apart from its predecessor. The use of shadows and lighting intensifies the emotional gravity of each scene, making the visuals not just beautiful but narratively compelling.
Storytelling and Structure
If "A New Hope" laid the foundation of this galactic adventure, "The Empire Strikes Back" expanded its scope and plunged deeper into its characters' emotional landscapes. The screenplay, refined by Leigh Brackett and Lawrence Kasdan, introduces a complex narrative with richer character development and a more layered plot. The film daringly deviates from the traditional victory arc, opting instead for a more sombre, introspective tone that reflects the characters' turmoil and growth. This bold narrative choice elevates the sequel to new heights, endowing it with a maturity and sophistication that many sequels fail to achieve.
Character Development and Performances
The heart of "The Empire Strikes Back" lies in its profound character development, particularly that of Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill), Han Solo (Harrison Ford), and Princess Leia (Carrie Fisher). Hamill delivers a nuanced performance as Luke grapples with his identity and destiny; Ford encapsulates Solo's roguish charm and depth, while Fisher's Leia is both a determined leader and a vulnerable human. The introduction of Yoda, masterfully voiced and puppeteered by Frank Oz, adds a philosophical layer to the story, challenging Luke and the audience with deep existential questions.
The chemistry among the lead characters, especially the budding romance between Han and Leia, provides both warmth and tension, enriching the narrative and giving audiences moments of relief amidst the darker undertones of the saga.
Villainous Presence: Darth Vader
Darth Vader, portrayed by David Prowse with the unforgettable voice of James Earl Jones, cements his status as one of cinema's most formidable villains. "The Empire Strikes Back" gives Vader more screen time and context, delving into his complexities and setting up the familial reveal that would shock cinema audiences: "No, I am your father." This line, delivered during the climactic lightsaber duel with Luke, remains one of the most iconic moments in film history, reshaping the Star Wars narrative arc and deepening the conflict at its core.
Cultural and Historical Significance
=Upon its release, "The Empire Strikes Back" was met with mixed reviews; however, its reputation has only grown over time, and it is now widely regarded as the best film in the Star Wars series. It challenged the expectations of what a sequel could be and expanded the scope of George Lucas's storytelling canvas. Its influence is evident in the numerous sequels and franchises that have since sought to emulate its success in deepening character arcs and complex storytelling.
Relevance to Pop Culture
The film's impact on pop culture is immeasurable, from spawning memorable lines to influencing countless works in film, television, and other media. It's a testament to the enduring appeal of the Star Wars universe, continually attracting new fans while keeping long-time enthusiasts hooked.
"The Empire Strikes Back" is not just a film; it's a profound cinematic experience that resonat

"Stripes" (1981), directed by Ivan Reitman and starring Bill Murray and Harold Ramis, is a quintessential early '80s comedy that perfectly captures the zeitgeist of an era that teetered between the absurdity of the Cold War and the ever-relaxing social mores. At its heart, "Stripes" is a comedic rebellion against the rigidity of military life, making it a film that resonates with the themes of individualism and anti-establishment sentiment prevalent at the time.
The Plot & CharactersThe film follows the misadventures of John Winger (Bill Murray), a down-on-his-luck cab driver who, in a fit of existential despair, convinces his friend Russell Ziskey (Harold Ramis), a mild-mannered English teacher, to join the Army with him. Their journey from slackers to slightly less inept soldiers forms the crux of the story. Murray's portrayal of Winger is a masterclass in comedic timing and deadpan delivery, embodying the everyman who finds himself at odds with authority at every turn.
Harold Ramis' Russell is the perfect foil to Murray's antics. His subtle and intelligent performance balances the overt slapstick and provides a grounding presence amidst the chaos. Together, they stumble through basic training under the watchful eye of their beleaguered sergeant, played by Warren Oates, who embodies the archetypal tough-as-nails drill sergeant with a secret soft spot for his bumbling recruits.
Cinematography & DirectionIvan Reitman’s direction in "Stripes" is both savvy and unpretentious. He allows the comedic talent of his cast to shine through, using a straightforward cinematic style that keeps the focus firmly on the characters and their shenanigans. The film is shot with a traditional approach that eschews flashy techniques for steady, well-composed scenes that support the comedic narrative without overshadowing it.
Cultural Impact & Relevance"Stripes" came out at a time when America was dealing with the hangover from Vietnam and general scepticism about military interventions. The film taps into this sentiment by portraying the Army as a place where the misfits and the rebels not only fit in but thrive in their ridiculous ways. This subversive undercurrent helped "Stripes" resonate with a generation that was disillusioned with authority, making it a staple of 1980s cinema and a cultural touchstone for discussions about conformity and rebellion.Moreover, the film’s influence can be seen in the way it helped to define the comedy genre for the decade. It paved the way for a type of humour that is both irreverent and introspective, giving rise to the careers of its leads and influencing other comedic works that followed.
Humour & WritingThe humour in "Stripes" is both overt and subtle, blending slapstick with witty dialogue that mocks the seriousness of military conventions. Bill Murray's irreverent character is constantly skewering the absurdity he encounters, whether it's questioning why any sane person would want to be a soldier or improvising one of his many irrepressible speeches that rally his fellow underdogs to his cause. The script, co-written by Harold Ramis, Len Blum, and Daniel Goldberg, is sharp and full of memorable lines that have entered the pop culture lexicon, like the classic "That's the fact, Jack!"
The screenplay also smartly uses its comedic elements to develop its characters, making them more than just caricatures. We see genuine growth in John and Russell, who, despite their initial lack of direction, find something resembling pride and purpose in their service, albeit in their typically unconventional ways. This transformation provides a satisfying narrative arc that balances the film’s sillier moments with moments of genuine character development.
Impact on Pop Culture"Stripes" also serves as a prime example of how comedy can reflect and influence societal attitudes. Its enduring popularity underscores its effectiveness at capturing the spirit of its time and offering a form of escapism while also providin

Welcome back, fight fans, to another round in the cinematic boxing ring with "Rocky II," a film that not only cements Sylvester Stallone's Rocky Balboa as an American cinematic icon but also offers a deeper look into the life of his rival-turned-friend, Apollo Creed, masterfully portrayed by Carl Weathers. As part of our Carl Weathers tribute tour, let's dive into how "Rocky II" contributes to the legacy of this incredible actor and character, and why this sequel punches just as hard as its predecessor.
"Rocky II" picks up right where the original left off, with both fighters battered and bruised from their epic confrontation, yet there's a palpable shift. The sequel, released in 1979 and again directed by Stallone, explores themes of fame, family, and the fight beyond the ring. It’s a film that balances the gritty realism of 1970s cinema with the burgeoning optimism of the 1980s.
At the heart of this film lies the dynamic between Rocky and Apollo. While the original "Rocky" was an underdog story, "Rocky II" is more about redemption and resilience. Apollo Creed, reeling from the public belief he didn’t rightfully win, insists on a rematch to prove not just to his fans, but to himself, that he is the best. Carl Weathers brings a complex mixture of vulnerability and bravado to Apollo, making him more than just a foil to Rocky; he’s a protagonist in his own right.
Carl’s performance is nuanced. In the public eye, Apollo is the charismatic and untouchable champion, but Weathers allows us to glimpse the insecurity and pressure beneath the surface. This is most evident in scenes where Apollo sorts through fan mail, his face falling as he reads letters that accuse him of rigging the fight. It’s a testament to Weathers' acting prowess that he can switch between these layers of personality so effortlessly, making Apollo Creed a multi-dimensional character who transcends the typical antagonist role.
The chemistry between Stallone and Weathers is palpable, transforming "Rocky II" into not just a story about a boxer, but a tale of rivalry and respect that evolves into a genuine friendship. This development is pivotal as it sets the tone for their future interactions in the sequels.
From a cinematic standpoint, "Rocky II" enhances what made the original so compelling. The fight choreography is sharper and more intense, reflective of the character’s growth and the stakes at hand. Bill Butler’s cinematography captures the gritty texture of Philadelphia, making the city itself a character that mirrors Rocky’s raw determination and Apollo’s polished prowess.
The training montage in "Rocky II" is iconic, amplified by Bill Conti’s rousing score. As Rocky sprints through the streets of Philly, culminating in his triumphant ascent up the Art Museum steps, we’re not just watching a man train for a fight; we’re witnessing someone fighting for his life's meaning. Meanwhile, Apollo’s training scenes are equally compelling, though characterized by a slick, professional sheen that contrasts sharply with Rocky's raw, almost chaotic regimen.
Storytelling in "Rocky II" is where Stallone’s writing shines. The screenplay delves deeper into Rocky's struggles, particularly his role as a husband and soon-to-be father. Adrian, played by Talia Shire, becomes a stronger force in this film, her hospital scene with Rocky providing one of the film's emotional climaxes. Her quiet strength complements Rocky’s loud determination, and her approval is his linchpin.
The climactic fight is a masterclass in building tension and delivering payoff. Every punch thrown by Rocky and Apollo carries weight, not just in physical terms but in what it means for their lives. The final rounds are a rollercoaster of emotions, with audiences feeling each blow as both fighters strive for their victories.
"Rocky II" concludes on a note that’s both victorious and introspective. Rocky’s cry of "Yo, Adrian, I did it!" isn’t just about winning the fight; i

When "Basic Instinct" first graced cinema screens in 1992, it didn't just arrive; it detonated with the force of a cultural and cinematic bombshell. Directed by Paul Verhoeven and penned by Joe Eszterhas, this neo-noir thriller became a topic of fervent discussion, controversy, and analysis. Damo's pick for the podcast, undoubtedly, underscores not just the film's enduring impact but also its provocative standing in the annals of movie history. So, let's dive into the icy waters of "Basic Instinct" and explore what makes it such a compelling, if contentious, masterpiece.
The Plot: A Labyrinth of Desire and Deception
At its core, "Basic Instinct" is a detective story, but labelling it as such feels reductive. The narrative follows San Francisco police detective Nick Curran (played by Michael Douglas), who investigates the brutal murder of a rock star. The prime suspect? Catherine Tramell (Sharon Stone), a brilliant, enigmatic novelist whose fictional murders eerily resemble real-life killings. What unfolds is a high-stakes game of cat and mouse, but who's the cat and who's the mouse shifts with the narrative's serpentine twists and turns.
Cinematography: Crafting the Neo-Noir Aesthetic
Verhoeven's direction and Jan de Bont’s cinematography paint "Basic Instinct" in the stark contrasts and shadows of classic film noir, yet with a distinctly modern flair that’s both sleek and raw. The film's visual style is not just a backdrop but a character in its own right. It amplifies the story's erotic tension and the psychological depth of its characters, using the moody landscapes of San Francisco and a chilling score by Jerry Goldsmith to deepen the atmosphere of suspense.
The Controversy: Pushing Boundaries or Crossing Lines?
No discussion of "Basic Instinct" can skirt around the controversy it ignited upon release. Its graphic violence and explicit sexuality, particularly the infamous interrogation scene, sparked debates on misogyny, homophobia, and the exploitation of women in cinema. The film was both condemned and celebrated for its unapologetic content, becoming a lightning rod for discussions about censorship, artistic freedom, and the portrayal of LGBTQ+ characters in media. Despite the polarized reactions, it's this very controversy that cemented the film's place in pop culture and academic discourse.
Character Development: An Intricate Dance
The chess match between Nick and Catherine is underpinned by their complex psychological profiles. Douglas' portrayal of Curran—a cop with a troubled past and a penchant for self-destruction—offers a fascinating glimpse into a man ensnared by his own desires and demons. Sharon Stone’s Catherine Tramell, meanwhile, is an iconic figure of the femme fatale archetype, redefined. Stone delivers a career-defining performance, imbuing Catherine with an icy intelligence, seductive charm, and an enigmatic aura that challenges both Nick and the audience's perceptions at every turn.
The Screenplay: A Double-Edged Sword
Eszterhas' screenplay is a masterclass in building suspense and developing intriguing characters, though it's not without its flaws. The dialogue sometimes veers into the melodramatic, and certain plot elements haven't aged well, reflecting the era's less enlightened attitudes. Yet, it's these imperfections that make "Basic Instinct" such a rich subject for analysis. The film’s narrative bravado, combined with its thematic ambitions, provides fertile ground for discussions about power dynamics, obsession, and identity.
Cultural Significance: A Mirror and a Maeldrome
"Basic Instinct" arrived at a crossroads in American cinema and society, reflecting the burgeoning discourse on sexuality, violence, and censorship. It challenged audiences and filmmakers alike to confront their boundaries and biases. The movie's impact extended beyond the silver screen, influencing fashion, music, and literature, and sparking a wave of erotic thrillers that sought to emulate its success. Over

In celebration of our 100th episode, what better film to dissect than "JAWS," the blockbuster that redefined the summer movie experience and cemented Steven Spielberg's status as a master storyteller. Released in 1975, "JAWS" not only terrorized audiences with its portrayal of a man-eating great white shark but also demonstrated the power of cinema to evoke primal fears and unforgettable suspense. Let's dive into the depths of "JAWS" and explore what makes it a cinematic masterpiece and a cultural phenomenon.
The Genesis of Fear: A Simple Premise, An Unforgettable Impact
Based on Peter Benchley's novel, "JAWS" follows the harrowing ordeal of Amity Island, a fictional New England beach town, as it faces the deadly threat of a massive shark. Chief Brody (Roy Scheider), a New York cop turned local sheriff, marine biologist Matt Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss), and grizzled fisherman Quint (Robert Shaw) set out to kill the beast. Yet, the film’s genius lies not in the story it tells but in how it tells it. Spielberg's direction transforms a straightforward plot into a masterclass in tension, pacing, and fear, making the unseen and the unknown our greatest terror.
The Cinematic Craft: Building Tension Beneath the Surface
Spielberg's innovative use of camera angles, John Williams' iconic score, and Verna Fields' tight editing work in concert to create an atmosphere thick with suspense. The decision to delay the full reveal of the shark until deep into the movie amplifies the suspense, making each attack all the more terrifying. Spielberg turns the ocean itself into a character, one that's beautiful yet menacing, inviting yet treacherous. The director's ability to coax fear from the mere suggestion of danger—using the audience's imagination against them—is a testament to his understanding of the horror genre's core principles.
The Iconic Score: The Sound of Fear
John Williams' score for "JAWS" is nothing short of legendary. The simple, two-note motif has become synonymous with impending doom, illustrating how powerful a soundtrack can be in driving the emotional pulse of a film. Williams’ music plays a pivotal role in building tension, often acting as the shark's unseen presence. It's a prime example of how sound can be used to heighten suspense and invoke visceral reactions from the audience.
Characters and Performances: The Human Element
At its heart, "JAWS" is a story about people, and Spielberg never loses sight of this amidst the thrills and chills. The film's central trio, Brody, Hooper, and Quint, are richly drawn characters brought to life by Scheider, Dreyfuss, and Shaw's compelling performances. Their dynamics—ranging from camaraderie to conflict—add depth to the narrative, making their quest to hunt the shark as much a personal journey as it is a battle for survival. Quint's Indianapolis monologue remains one of cinema's most powerful scenes, offering a glimpse into the scars that define us.
Impact and Legacy: Changing the Tide of Cinema
"JAWS" didn't just scare millions of people out of the water; it revolutionised the film industry. It was the first true "blockbuster," setting new standards for marketing, distribution, and box office expectations. The summer movie season, now a staple of the film industry, was essentially born with the release of "JAWS." Its success paved the way for high-concept films that prioritize spectacle and broad appeal, shaping the modern blockbuster landscape.
Moreover, "JAWS" demonstrated the potential of special effects to enhance storytelling, despite the mechanical shark's frequent malfunctions. These technical difficulties inadvertently improved the film by forcing Spielberg to rely on suggestions rather than explicit visuals, a technique that would influence horror filmmakers for generations.
The Cultural Phenomenon: Beyond the Screen
The impact of "JAWS" extended far beyond movie theatres. It entered the public consciousness like few films before or since, influencing not only p

In this latest episode of the Born to Watch Podcast, hosts Whitey and Gow, along with special guest Sloane Nickson, dive into the 2007 action-packed thriller, "Shooter". Directed by Antoine Fuqua and based on the novel "Point of Impact" by Stephen Hunter, "Shooter" follows the story of Bob Lee Swagger (played by Mark Wahlberg), a former Marine Corps sniper who is coaxed back into action only to be framed for a crime he didn't commit. 
"Shooter" starts with a bang, quite literally, setting the tone for a film that's both intense and complex. The narrative quickly evolves, presenting viewers with a puzzle that is as political as it is personal. Wahlberg's character, Swagger, is a man of few words but immense skill, drawn out of a self-imposed exile to prevent an assassination attempt on the President. However, the plot takes a dark turn when Swagger is betrayed, and framed for the assassination he was trying to prevent. The film's plot is a rollercoaster of twists and turns, each meticulously crafted to keep viewers on the edge of their seats.
Mark Wahlberg delivers one of his career-best performances as Swagger, embodying the role of the disillusioned yet highly capable marksman. His portrayal is both nuanced and powerful, bringing depth to a character that could easily have been one-dimensional. The supporting cast, including Michael Peña as FBI Agent Nick Memphis and Danny Glover as Colonel Isaac Johnson, provide solid performances that add layers to the story. However, it is Wahlberg's portrayal of Swagger's journey from isolation to redemption that stands as the film's emotional core.
Beyond its action-packed surface, "Shooter" delves into themes of corruption, betrayal, and the search for justice. The film critiques the manipulation and exploitation inherent in the military and governmental institutions, making a poignant statement about the sacrifices of soldiers and the often murky ethics of those in power. Swagger's quest for truth and vindication is not just a personal journey but a commentary on the struggle against systemic injustice.
Antoine Fuqua's direction is precise and compelling, balancing intense action sequences with moments of poignant introspection. The cinematography, led by Peter Menzies Jr., captures the expansive landscapes and tight, tense atmospheres with equal skill, highlighting the film's diverse settings from remote mountains to urban sprawls. The action sequences are particularly noteworthy, choreographed and shot in a way that feels both realistic and exhilarating.
Since its release in 2007, "Shooter" has garnered a dedicated fan base, appreciating its blend of action, suspense, and moral complexity. It has spurred discussions about the representation of military veterans in cinema and the ethical dilemmas faced by those who serve. The film's impact goes beyond entertainment, prompting viewers to consider the real-world implications of the themes it explores.
"Shooter" is a film that manages to be both a thrilling action ride and a thought-provoking exploration of deeper themes. Mark Wahlberg's performance, coupled with Fuqua's direction and compelling narrative, makes for a film that is engaging from start to finish. As Whitey, Damo, and Sloane Nickson discuss in this episode of the Born to Watch Podcast, "Shooter" stands as a testament to the power of cinema to entertain, challenge, and inspire. It's a film that not only marksman enthusiasts will appreciate but also those who value storytelling that dares to address the complexities of justice, loyalty, and redemption.
In wrapping up this review for the Born to Watch Podcast, "Shooter" is a film that certainly hits its target, offering a blend of action and substance that is as rare as it is captivating. Whether you're a first-time viewer or returning to appreciate its intricacies, "Shooter" is a film that continues to resonate, proving itself to be a noteworthy entry in the action genre and beyond.
Please follow the Podcast and join our