13 episodes
Patents: Post-Grant Podcast Troutman Pepper, Maia Harris
-
- Negócios
In this podcast series, Troutman Pepper IP attorneys dive into post-grant proceedings to provide patent owners, patent challengers, and intellectual property practitioners with insights on strategies, trends, and USPTO developments.
-
Behaving Badly: OpenSky v. VLSI and Sanctions at the PTAB
In this episode, Troutman Pepper Partner Andy Zappia and Counsel Bryan Smith analyze the sanctions order made public on February 6 in the OpenSky v. VLSI IPR proceeding.
-
USPTO Director Review
In this episode, Nick Gallo moderates a discussion with firm colleagues Andy Zappia and Bryan Smith on the increasingly active role of the USPTO director in inter partes and post-grant review proceedings, including through the director review procedure.
-
Disputing Patent-Eligible Subject Matter in PGRs and IPRs
In this episode, Troutman Pepper Partner Andrew Zappia and attorneys Gunnar Leinberg and Christina Shifton discuss patent-eligible subject matter disputes under 35 USC Section 101 in IPR and PGR proceedings.
-
Reexamination in IPR and PGR Practice
In the final installment of this three-episode series, Andy Zappia, Michael Goldman and Megan Thisse O'Gara discuss the mechanics and strategic considerations for using reexamination as a means to amend claims in IPR and PGR proceedings.
-
Reissue in IPR and PGR Practice
In this second installment of a three-episode series, Troutman Pepper Attorney Andy Zappia moderates a discussion with his colleagues Michael Goldman and Megan Thisse O’Gara, on the mechanics and best strategies for using reissue to amend claims in the context of IPR and PGR proceedings.
-
Reissue vs. Reexamination in IPR and PGR Practice
In this first of a three-episode series, Troutman Pepper's Andy Zappia, Michael Goldman, and Megan Thisse O'Gara discuss the pros and cons of reissue versus reexamination as a means to amend claims in the context of IPR and PGR proceedings.