A Comparison of Dequalinium Chloride Vaginal Tablets (Fluomizin (R)) and Clindamycin Vaginal Cream in the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Single-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety Medizin - Open Access LMU - Teil 19/22

    • Education

Aims: To investigate if vaginal application of dequalinium chloride (DQC, Fluomizin (R)) is as effective as vaginal clindamycin (CLM) in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV). Methods:This was a multinational, multicenter, single-blind, randomized trial in 15 centers, including 321 women. They were randomized to either vaginal DQC tablets or vaginal CLM cream. Follow-up visits were 1 week and 1 month after treatment. Clinical cure based on Amsel's criteria was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were rate of treatment failures and recurrences, incidence of post-treatment vulvovaginal candidosis (VVC), lactobacillary grade (LBG), total symptom score (TSC), and safety. Results: Cure rates with DQC (Cl: 81.5%, C2: 79.5%) were as high as with CLM (Cl: 78.4%, C2: 77.6%). Thus, the treatment with DQC had equal efficacy as CLM cream. A trend to less common post-treatment VVC in the DQC-treated women was observed (DQC: 2.5%, CLM: 7.7%; p = 0.06). Both treatments were well tolerated with no serious adverse events occurring. Conclusion: Vaginal DQC has been shown to be equally effective as CLM cream, to be well tolerated with no systemic safety concerns, and is therefore a valid alternative therapy for women with BV {[}ClinicalTrials.gov, Med380104, NCT01125410]. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Aims: To investigate if vaginal application of dequalinium chloride (DQC, Fluomizin (R)) is as effective as vaginal clindamycin (CLM) in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV). Methods:This was a multinational, multicenter, single-blind, randomized trial in 15 centers, including 321 women. They were randomized to either vaginal DQC tablets or vaginal CLM cream. Follow-up visits were 1 week and 1 month after treatment. Clinical cure based on Amsel's criteria was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were rate of treatment failures and recurrences, incidence of post-treatment vulvovaginal candidosis (VVC), lactobacillary grade (LBG), total symptom score (TSC), and safety. Results: Cure rates with DQC (Cl: 81.5%, C2: 79.5%) were as high as with CLM (Cl: 78.4%, C2: 77.6%). Thus, the treatment with DQC had equal efficacy as CLM cream. A trend to less common post-treatment VVC in the DQC-treated women was observed (DQC: 2.5%, CLM: 7.7%; p = 0.06). Both treatments were well tolerated with no serious adverse events occurring. Conclusion: Vaginal DQC has been shown to be equally effective as CLM cream, to be well tolerated with no systemic safety concerns, and is therefore a valid alternative therapy for women with BV {[}ClinicalTrials.gov, Med380104, NCT01125410]. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Top Podcasts In Education

The Mel Robbins Podcast
Mel Robbins
The Livy Method Podcast
Gina Livy
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
Dr. Jordan B. Peterson
The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck Podcast
Mark Manson
TED Talks Daily
TED
The Rich Roll Podcast
Rich Roll

More by Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Women Thinkers in Antiquity and the Middle Ages - SD
Peter Adamson
Hegel lectures by Robert Brandom, LMU Munich
Robert Brandom, Axel Hutter
John Lennox - Hat die Wissenschaft Gott begraben?
Professor John C. Lennox, University of Oxford
MCMP – Philosophy of Mathematics
MCMP Team
MCMP – Logic
MCMP Team
Podcast Jüdische Geschichte
Abteilung für Jüdische Geschichte und Kultur, LMU München