870 episodes

The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order. It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. This podcast feed contains audio files of Federalist Society panel discussions, debates, addresses, and other events related to law and public policy. Additional audio and video can be found at https://fedsoc.org/commentary.

FedSoc Events The Federalist Society

    • News

The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order. It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. This podcast feed contains audio files of Federalist Society panel discussions, debates, addresses, and other events related to law and public policy. Additional audio and video can be found at https://fedsoc.org/commentary.

    Cocktail Hour Reception and Banquet, Arthur N. Rupe Debate and Presentation of the Annual Joseph Story Award and Feddie Awards

    Cocktail Hour Reception and Banquet, Arthur N. Rupe Debate and Presentation of the Annual Joseph Story Award and Feddie Awards

    Join us for a closing banquet and the Arthur N. Rupe Debate, entitled "Resolved: The Separation of Powers is a Dangerous, Extraconstitutional Maxim." Special code on nametag required for admission.
    Featuring:

    Prof. Noah Feldman, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law and Director, Julis-Rabinowitz Program on Jewish and Israeli Law, Harvard Law School
    Prof. Michael W. McConnell, Richard and Frances Mallery Professor and Director of the Constitutional Law Center, Stanford Law School
    Moderator: Hon. Steven J. Menashi, Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

    • 1 hr 13 min
    Panel IV: Constitutions, Elections, and Procedure – (How) Can We Change How We Separate Powers?

    Panel IV: Constitutions, Elections, and Procedure – (How) Can We Change How We Separate Powers?

    Suppose we don’t like how our governmental powers are separated. Perhaps we think the executive branch has too much power. Or perhaps we think that it is doing more than the original meaning of “the executive power” would suggest, but we think that is a good thing. What are the legitimate methods of constitutional change in our republic? Must we amend the Constitution? How should an originalist approach these questions?
    Featuring:

    Prof. Sherif Girgis, Associate Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame Law School
    Prof. Lawrence Lessig, Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership, Harvard Law School
    Prof. Stephen E. Sachs, Antonin Scalia Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
    Moderator: Hon. Britt C. Grant, Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

    • 1 hr 40 min
    Panel III: The Judicial Power and Evaluating Judicial Supremacy

    Panel III: The Judicial Power and Evaluating Judicial Supremacy

    New presidential administrations start with a flurry of administrative actions. These fresh rules, guidelines, and procedures in turn face judicial scrutiny from the moment they are finalized. Oversight from the judiciary can keep agencies accountable and within the bounds of the law. But when judges get the final say on everything the executive does, policies can take years—even decades—to implement and can fluctuate wildly with the ebbs and flows of litigation. Has something gone awry with the way judges are “saying what the law is”?
    Featuring:

    Prof. John C. Harrison, James Madison Distinguished Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law
    Prof. Amanda L. Tyler, Shannon C. Turner Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley School of Law
    Prof. Jeannie Suk Gersen, John H. Watson, Jr. Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
    Prof. Gary S. Lawson, Associate Dean for Intellectual Life and Philip S. Beck Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
    Moderator: Hon. Benjamin Beaton, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky

    • 1 hr 34 min
    Panel II: The Executive Power, the Legislative Power, and the Administrative State

    Panel II: The Executive Power, the Legislative Power, and the Administrative State

    Many critics of modern administrative law want a world where Congress does more things, and the executive does less—which would lead to relative stability across administrations. Simultaneously, many also want their vote in presidential elections to have meaningful policy consequences. Between these two competing intuitions lies a tension at the heart of much contemporary political strife, which, of course, has a great deal to do with who controls Congress and who controls the White House.
    Featuring:

    Prof. Julian Davis Mortenson, James G. Phillipp Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School
    Eli Nachmany, Associate, Covington & Burling LLP
    Prof. Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Professor of Law and Joseph Lipsett Scholar, Boston University School of Law
    Prof. Christopher J. Walker, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School
    Moderator: Hon. Jennifer Walker Elrod, Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

    • 1 hr 44 min
    Fireside Chat: “Why Separate Powers?” A Conceptual Introduction

    Fireside Chat: “Why Separate Powers?” A Conceptual Introduction

    Professor Cass Sunstein and Judge Raymond Kethledge will open the symposium with a fireside chat exploring the conceptual question of why states choose to separate powers along with the relationship between the separation of powers and the rule of law.
    Featuring

    Hon. Raymond M. Kethledge, Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and Lecturer on Law, Harvard Law School
    Prof. Cass R. Sunstein, Robert Walmsley University Professor, Harvard Law School

    • 1 hr 24 min
    Panel 1: State Supreme Court Candidate Forum

    Panel 1: State Supreme Court Candidate Forum

    Featuring:

    Hon. Joseph Deters, Justice, Supreme Court of Ohio
    Hon. Michael Donnelly, Justice, Supreme Court of Ohio
    Hon. Lisa Forbes, Judge, 8th District Court of Appeals, State of Ohio
    Hon. Daniel Hawkins, Judge, Franklin County Court
    Hon. Megan Shanahan, Judge, Hamilton County Court
    Hon. Melody Stewart, Justice, Supreme Court of Ohio
    Moderator: Professor Chris Walker, University of Michigan Law School

    • 1 hr 38 min

Top Podcasts In News

Ellinofreneia Official
Digital Minds
ΤΟ ΒΗΜΑ Σήμερα
Alter Ego Media
LIFO POLITICS
LIFO PODCASTS
Ράδιο «Κ» | Kathimerini
Kathimerini & Digital Minds
Global News Podcast
BBC World Service
The Daily
The New York Times

You Might Also Like

FedSoc Forums
The Federalist Society
Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Senik
The Hoover Institution
Divided Argument
Will Baude, Dan Epps
SCOTUScast
The Federalist Society
We the People
National Constitution Center
Amarica's Constitution
Akhil Reed Amar

More by The Federalist Society

Necessary & Proper Podcast
The Federalist Society
RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast
The Federalist Society
Faculty Division Bookshelf
The Federalist Society
FedSoc Forums
The Federalist Society
SCOTUScast
The Federalist Society