The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up‪)‬ Niall Boylan

In this episode, Niall tackles the question: Should manual laborers be paid the same as skilled workers?
Some callers argue that manual laborers should be paid the same as skilled workers. They emphasize that manual laborers make significant contributions to projects and without their hard work, skilled workers wouldn't be able to do their jobs effectively. It's crucial to recognize the value of all workers and pay them fairly for their contributions.
However, other callers disagree with the idea that manual laborers should be paid the same as skilled workers. They believe that skilled workers have invested time and effort into developing their expertise and should be compensated accordingly. Paying manual laborers the same as skilled workers could undermine the value of specialized skills and discourage people from pursuing careers in skilled trades.
Niall reflects on the diverse perspectives shared by callers and the complexities of determining fair wages for different types of work.

In this episode, Niall addresses a pressing question: Would you allow your child to leave school for a trade?
The topic arises from an email sent in by a listener, Pauline, who is torn between her son's passion for working with his hands and her concerns about his future without completing his Leaving Cert.
Pauline's son, 16, has struggled academically but shows real talent and interest in working with his father in the family garage. While Pauline is worried about her son's future without a Leaving Cert qualification, her husband sees an opportunity for their son to start an apprenticeship and work full-time in the family business.
Niall opens up the lines to callers to hear their opinions on this dilemma.
Some callers completely understand Pauline's dilemma and believe her son's passion and talent lie in working with his hands. They argue that traditional education isn't the right path for everyone and suggest that Pauline should support her son's interest in pursuing a trade.
However, other callers sympathize with Pauline's concerns about her son's future. They believe it's important for him to complete his Leaving Cert before making any decisions about his career.
Niall reflects on the diverse perspectives shared by callers and the challenges faced by parents like Pauline in guiding their children's education and career choices.

In this episode, Niall covers the May Bank Holiday protest, asking participants why they are attending and what their concerns are.
The protest comes in response to the emergence of a new migrant "tent city" along the banks of the Grand Canal in Dublin. Despite government assurances that such encampments would not be tolerated, the number of tents has risen, sparking frustration and calls for action.
While the protest is primarily focused on the immigration crisis, many participants are also protesting against broader government failures, including housing, healthcare, and the cost of living. Some see the protest as an opportunity to demand better solutions and hold political leaders accountable.
On the other hand, there are counter-protests organized by groups who believe that the national protest is primarily about immigration and label it as a far-right demonstration.
Niall opens up the lines to callers to discuss their reasons for attending the protest or their concerns if they are not participating. Those involved in the counter-protest are also invited to share their perspective.
Some callers express their solidarity with those affected by the immigration crisis and emphasize the need to demand better solutions from the government. They highlight that the protest is not just about immigration but also about holding leaders accountable for failures in housing, healthcare, and the cost of living.
The protest highlights the public's concerns regarding the immigration crisis and broader issues of government accountability. It's a significant moment for citizens to voice their frustrations and demand meaningful change.

In this episode, Niall explores whether the right to complain starts at the polls. With the upcoming local and European elections in Ireland, voter turnout is a critical issue.
Many people choose not to vote due to their disappointment with the political system and the failure of elected representatives to fulfill their promises. Some believe that voting won't make a difference, while others feel uninformed about the issues and candidates.
However, there are those who emphasize the importance of voting. They argue that if we want change, we need to use our voice and cast our ballots. Low voter turnout only strengthens the status quo, and holding our representatives accountable through voting is essential for a functioning democracy.
On the other hand, some callers suggest that while voting is important, it's not the only way to participate in democracy. They believe that voter apathy stems from a broader disillusionment with the political system and advocate for other forms of civic participation, such as community organizing and activism.
The discussion highlights the complexities surrounding voter turnout and civic engagement. While some emphasize the importance of voting as a fundamental right in a democracy, others point to deeper issues that contribute to voter apathy. As the elections approach, it's essential to consider how to address these issues and encourage broader civic participation.

In this episode, Niall looks into the contentious issue of whether politicians should be prosecuted for lying. The discussion arises from a news story from Wales, where members of the Senedd, the Welsh parliament, are considering legislation to criminalize lying by politicians.
Adam Price, former leader of Plaid Cymru and a leading proponent of the legislation, argues that in a world of post-truth politics, it's vital to hold politicians accountable for their lies. The proposed law would make it illegal for politicians to wilfully mislead the parliament or the public.
Some callers believe it's about time we held politicians accountable for their lies. They argue that lying by politicians undermines trust in the political system and that criminalizing lying would help restore faith in democracy.
However, others express concerns about the potential chilling effect on free speech and political debate. They worry that criminalizing lying could deter politicians from speaking out on important issues for fear of prosecution.
While it's important for politicians to be honest and transparent, making lying a criminal offence could be difficult to enforce and could lead to a slippery slope of censorship. Instead of criminalizing lying, these callers suggest focusing on holding politicians accountable through other means, such as fact-checking and public scrutiny.
The discussion on whether politicians should be prosecuted for lying revealed diverse perspectives on the complex issue. While some callers emphasized the importance of holding politicians accountable for their lies, others expressed concerns about the potential impact on free speech and political debate. As the debate continues, finding a balance between accountability and freedom of expression remains essential.

UK Immigration Barrister, Paul Turner
 
Niall was told today that 'If we become a transit country for migrants... then the numbers I don't believe will go down.' UK Immigration Barrister, Paul Turner, on the whether the Prime Minister is celebrating Rwanda plan success too early or not.
Paul went on to tell Niall Boylan that he has heard that legal representatives for illegal migrants in the UK are telling their clients to go to Ireland to avid deportation.
This spells disaster for Ireland and controlling immigration.