Anglican Aesthetics Sean Luke

In this episode, I show how standard pro-choice arguments that appeal to anything other than the non-human-personhood of the fetus could be consistently used to justify infanticide. If you are against infanticide, you should drop these arguments. The argument over abortion needs to remain over the fundamental issue of whether a fetus is a human person.

In this episode--and start of a series--I want to outline and critique key Mormon beliefs in the spirit of seeking truth and reaching Mormon friends with the saving love of Jesus Christ revealed in his true gospel. I want to both point to his beauty, and point to the wonder of the lovely triune God who made all things and desires fellowship with us. 

Here, I took a look at the claim that the Godhead is a unity of three distinct gods. 

In these notes, I will post relevant resources and links that will point you to further study. I intend to update this description with those links to both equip Christians to lovingly interact with their Mormon neighbors and reach Mormons with evidences that the Lord Jesus Christ faithfully preserved his gospel in the history of his church. 

In this video, I describe the differences between imputed and infused righteousness. I try to lay out both positions clearly, but also with a view to setting up a critique of infused righteousness in favor of the Reformation understanding of justification in a future video. I hope Roman Catholics find an accurate representation of their view and a helpful description of our differences.   

Douglas Beaumont argues that James 2:24 forces Protestants to choose between Sola Scripture or Sola Fide. In this episode, I clarify what Sola Scriptura actually is and show why his argument doesn't work. Hopefully this pushes the discussion forward and generates light rather than heat! 

Here is a description of the classic Protestant doctrines of imputation and justification. I find that some Protestants don't define this doctrine well, and perpetuate these misconceptions. I aim to clarify the doctrine over and against Roman Catholic misconceptions, and defend it as more faithful to the Biblical witness. This was sparked by claims made by Suan Sonna on Matt Fradd's channel. 

This is a brief argument testing what exactly we can say or deduce about ultimate reality from reason alone. What do the principles of reason strongly reveal about the nature of reality?