1 tim. 6 min

Mr. Thornton's Woods Bound By Oath by IJ

    • Stat och kommun

In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's protections against warrantless searches do not apply to "open fields." Which means that government agents can jump over fences, ignore No Trespassing signs, and roam private land at will. There are no limits. On this episode, we talk to Richard and Linda Thornton, whose property in rural Maine was at the center of the case. And we ask: Can the Founders really have thought the Constitution did not protect private woods, fields, farms, and more from warrantless invasions?







Click here for transcript.







Oliver v. United States 







Hester v. United States

In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's protections against warrantless searches do not apply to "open fields." Which means that government agents can jump over fences, ignore No Trespassing signs, and roam private land at will. There are no limits. On this episode, we talk to Richard and Linda Thornton, whose property in rural Maine was at the center of the case. And we ask: Can the Founders really have thought the Constitution did not protect private woods, fields, farms, and more from warrantless invasions?







Click here for transcript.







Oliver v. United States 







Hester v. United States

1 tim. 6 min

Mest populära poddar inom Stat och kommun

Podden Lika värde - en podd från Specialpedagogiska skolmyndigheten
Specialpedagogiska skolmyndigheten
Chefspodden
Svensk Chefsförening
Polispodden Stockholm
Polismyndigheten region Stockholm
FAR-podden
FAR
Strict Scrutiny
Crooked Media
Ny i Sverige-podden
Arbetsförmedlingen