Dan Caplis Denver's Talk Station 630 KHOW

David Olesky joins Dan to discuss National Prescription Drug Take Back Day on Saturday, April 27 from 10am to 2pm at dozens of locations throughout the Rocky Mountain region - including Colorado. David is the acting special agent in charge for the DEA Rocky Mountain Field Division.

Also, David Pecker of the National Enquirer testifies in Donald Trump's Manhattan trial over a 'catch and kill' story he allegedly ran for the former President. His unfortunate last name prompts Dan to ask listeners about the most difficult last names they've ever encountered - or may have themselves.

Democrats continue not to play the long game or consider the consequences of their actions, and it's playing right into the hands of Donald Trump and his supporters politically and morally. 

Andy McCarthy of National Review, and former federal prosecutor, reviews both Trump legal cases in court today - the argument over Presidential immunity in front of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Manhattan trial over funding for his non-disclosure agreement with Stormy Daniels.

Dr. Rob Margesson, Associate Professor of Communications at Regis University, has a long history of robust debate as a liberal with Jimmy Sengenberger's political posture on the right. At issue today, the ongoing pro-Hamas, anti-Israel protests and encampments at Columbia University in New York City and other college campuses nationwide, and where the line is between free speech and hate speech which threatens the safety and well-being of its intended targets.

Jimmy Sengenberger fills in for Dan, and reflects upon Dan's interview with Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO 3) and her votes against foreign aid for Israel, Taiwan, and Ukraine. Jimmy maintains that while he understands her principles in not supporting the bills, it is in America's best national security interests to fund all three fronts against adversaries like Hamas, China, and Russia.

CNN panelist and 'jury consultant' Jill Huntley Taylor contends Trump's legal team is able to make simple arguments that have great appeal to a jury, and this characterization really draws the ire of Dan as a person who tries cases in front of sharp jurors all the time.

Also, callers and texters challenge Dan to defend Speaker Mike Johnson's seeming flip-flop on Ukraine funding. Dan maintains that Johnson changed his mind in good faith based on new intelligence on the war shared with him in his new role as Speaker.