67 episodes

An unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast. Hosted by Will Baude and Dan Epps.

Divided Argument Will Baude, Dan Epps

    • Government
    • 4.8 • 564 Ratings

An unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast. Hosted by Will Baude and Dan Epps.

    Radical Agreement

    Radical Agreement

    After taking some listener questions, we analyze the lengthy shadow docket opinions in Labrador v. Poe, dealing with universal relief, emergency applications, and more. We then tackle two recent merits opinions: Devillier v. Texas (takings) and Muldrow v. St. Louis (Title VII).

    • 1 hr 10 min
    Bootlegging-Adjacent

    Bootlegging-Adjacent

    After discussing a few pending issues at the Court, we look back to analyze several decisions from last month-- FBI v. Fikre, a mootness case with national security implications, and the shadow docket dispute in one of many cases named United States v. Texas (the SB4 case)-- and then turn to last Friday's more recent decision in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado about the Takings Clause and local land use policies.

    • 1 hr 4 min
    Dinkus

    Dinkus

    After grappling with listener feedback ranging from the acoustic to the typographical, we catch up on last month's decisions in Great Lakes v. Raiders Retreat Realty (admiralty) and McElrath v. Georgia (double jeopardy). We then turn to last week's decisions about public officials on social media, Lindke v. Freed and O'Connor-Ratliff v. Garnier, and then finally to the statutory interpretation decision in Pulsifer v. United States. It's a lot of cases in just over an hour!

    • 1 hr 3 min
    Political Hacks Pretending to be Lawyers

    Political Hacks Pretending to be Lawyers

    We (of course) break down the Court's opinions in Trump v. Anderson, the Section Three case from Colorado. We also discuss the Court's cert. grant on Trump's immunity from criminal prosecution, and several other opinions on the orders list, dealing with rent control, magnet school admissions, and campus speech.

    • 59 min
    Votin' for Lincoln

    Votin' for Lincoln

    After quick review of an order about admissions at West Point and two new unanimous opinions, we spend almost all of the episode breaking down last week's oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson. What excuse will the Supreme Court use to keep Colorado from disqualifying Trump from the ballot?

    • 53 min
    Into the Brick Wall

    Into the Brick Wall

    After catching up on a few odds and ends, we decide to give the people what they want and discuss Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment and whether the Supreme Court could possibly declare Donald Trump ineligible for the Presidency. You won't want to miss it.

    • 1 hr 6 min

Customer Reviews

4.8 out of 5
564 Ratings

564 Ratings

willbaudefan ,

I LOVE THIS PODCAST!!!!!!!!

I LOVE IT SO SO SO MUCH ESPECIALLY WILL BAUDE HE IS MY HERO!!!!!!!!!!!!

jaldenfig ,

Excellent for Busy Nerds

As someone who is needy enough to want to keep up with SCOTUS news (up to and including esoteric Takings Clause cases) but who does not have the time or a job that allows me to do the legwork myself, this is the perfect podcast for me to get recaps of cases, from the most contentious to the least.

djw etal ,

Best Law Podcast Around!

Finally, a podcast centered around legal substance and not slapdash political musings. I absolutely love the back and forth between Baude and Paulsen. This podcast consistently galvanizes me to learn more about the intricacies of the law. Keep it up!

Top Podcasts In Government

Strict Scrutiny
Crooked Media
The Lawfare Podcast
The Lawfare Institute
5-4
Prologue Projects
Anne Hidalgo - Paris en Commun
Paris en Commun
Red Eye Radio
Cumulus Podcast Network
The Chris Plante Show
WMAL | Cumulus Podcast Network | Cumulus Media Washington

You Might Also Like

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Oyez
Amarica's Constitution
Akhil Reed Amar
We the People
National Constitution Center
Advisory Opinions
The Dispatch
SCOTUS 101
The Heritage Foundation
Strict Scrutiny
Crooked Media